Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 393–443 | Cite as

Inferring from topics

Scalar Implicatures as Topic-Dependent Inferences
  • Jan Van Kuppevelt
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atlas, J. D.: 1990, ‘Implicature and Logical Form: The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface’, Lectures presented at the Second European Summer School in Language, Logic and Information, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
  2. Bartsch, R.: 1976, ‘Topik-Fokus-Struktur und kategoriale Syntax’, in V. Ehrich and P. Finke (eds.),Grammatik und Pragmatik, Scriptor Verlag, Kronberg.Google Scholar
  3. Belnap, N. D. and T. B. Steel: 1976,The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  4. Belnap, N. D.: 1982, ‘Questions and Answers in Montague Grammar’, in S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.),Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, R. N.: 1981, ‘Language Acquisition, Psychological Dualism and the Definition of Pragmatics’, in H. Parret, M. Sbisà, and J. Verschueren (eds.),Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Carston, R.: 1985, ‘A reanalysis of Some “Quantity Implicatures”’, Unpublished ms., University College, London.Google Scholar
  7. Carston, R.: 1988, ‘Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics’, in R. M. Kempson (ed.),Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Fauconnier, G.: 1975a, ‘Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 6, 353–375.Google Scholar
  9. Fauconnier, G.: 1975b, ‘Polarity and the Scale Principle’,Papers from the 11th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 188–199.Google Scholar
  10. Fretheim, T.: 1992, ‘The Effect of Intonation on a Type of Scalar Implicature’,Journal of Pragmatics 18, 1–30.Google Scholar
  11. Gazdar, G.: 1979,Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Grice, H. P.: 1967,Logic and Conversation, Unpublished ms. of the William James Lectures, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  13. Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Groenendijk, J. A. G. and M. J. B. Stokhof: 1984, ‘On the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers’,Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, pp. 209–250.Google Scholar
  15. Grosz, B. J. and C. L. Sidner: 1986, ‘Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse’,Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204.Google Scholar
  16. Grosz, B.: 1978, ‘Discourse Knowledge’, in D. E. Walker (ed.),Understanding Spoken Language, Elsevier North-Holland, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Hamblin, C. L..: 1973, ‘Questions in Montague English’,Foundations of Language 10, 41–53.Google Scholar
  18. Harnish, R. M.: 1979, ‘Logical Form and Implicature’, in K. Bach and R. M. Harnish (eds.),Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
  19. Hausser, R. R.: 1983, ‘Surface Compositionality and the Semantics of Mood’, in J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch (eds.),Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschberg, J.: 1985,A Theory of Scalar Implicature, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. (Published in the Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series, Garland Publishers, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
  21. Horn, L. R.: 1972,On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  22. Horn, L. R.: 1989,A Natural History of Negation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Horn, L. R.: 1992, ‘The Said and the Unsaid’, in C. Barker and D. Dowry (eds.),Proceedings of SALT II. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  24. Karttunen, L.: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 344.Google Scholar
  25. Kempson, R.: 1986, ‘Ambiguity and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction’, in C. Travis (ed.),Meaning and Interpretation, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Klein, W. and C. von Stutterheim: 1987, ‘Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen’,Linguistische Berichte 109, 163–183.Google Scholar
  27. Kroch, A.: 1972, ‘Lexical and Inferred Meanings for Some Time Adverbs’,Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Lab. of Electronics, MIT, 104.Google Scholar
  28. Levinson, S.C.: 1983,Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson: 1988, ‘Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization’,Text 8, 243–281.Google Scholar
  30. Moser, M. and J. Moore: 1993, ‘Investigating Discourse Relations’, in O. Rambow (ed.),Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, Proceedings of the ACL SIG Workshop, Columbus (Ohio).Google Scholar
  31. Partee, B. H., A. ter Meulen, and R. F. Wall: 1990,Mathematical Methods in Linguistics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  32. Reichman, R.: 1978, ‘Conversational Coherency’,Cognitive Science 2.Google Scholar
  33. Rooth, M.: 1992, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’,Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.Google Scholar
  34. Sadock, J. M.: 1978, ‘On Testing for Conversational Implicature’, in P. Cole (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics.Google Scholar
  35. Sadock, J. M.: 1984, ‘Whither Radical Pragmatics?’, in D. Schiffrin (ed.),Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Georgetown University Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  36. Scha, R. J. H.: 1983,Logical Foundations of Question Answering, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  37. Scharten, R.: forthcoming,A Discourse-Semantic Account of Gricean Implicatures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  38. Seuren, P. A. M.: 1993, ‘Why Does 2 Mean “2”? — Grist to the Anti-Grice Mill’, in E. Hajičová (ed.),Functional Description of Language, Charles University, Prague.Google Scholar
  39. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986,Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  40. Stout, G. F.: 1896,Analytic Psychology, Allen and Unwin, London/Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Tichý, P.: 1978, ‘Questions, Answers and Logic’,American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 275–284.Google Scholar
  42. Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1991,Topic en Comment: Expliciete en Impliciete Vraagstelling in Discourse, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  43. Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1993, ‘About a Uniform Conception of S- and D-Topics’, in E. Hajiçová (ed.),Functional Description of Language, Charles University, Prague.Google Scholar
  44. Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1993, ‘Topic and Comment’, in R. E. Asher (ed.),The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1994, ‘Directionality in Discourse’, in P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.),Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Conference on Focus and Natural Language Processing, Heidelberg: IBM Working Papers.Google Scholar
  46. Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1995a, ‘Discourse Structure, Topicality and Questioning’,Journal of Linguistics 31, 109–147.Google Scholar
  47. Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1995b, ‘Main Structure and Side Structure in Discourse’,Linguistics 33, 809–833.Google Scholar
  48. Van Kuppevelt, J.: forthcoming, ‘Un(der)determinedness and Questioning in Discourse’.Google Scholar
  49. Vennemann, T.: 1975, ‘Topics, Sentence Accent, Ellipsis: A Proposal for their Formal Treatment’, in E. L. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Van Kuppevelt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of NymegenNymegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations