Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 137–177 | Cite as

E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora

  • Irene Heim
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäuerle, R. and U. Egli: 1985, ‘Anapher, Nominalphrase und Eselssätze’, Papier 105 des Sonderforschungsbereichs 99, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
  2. Berman, S.: 1987, ‘Situation-Based Semantics for Adverbs of Quantification’, in J. Blevins and A. Vainikka (eds.),University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 12, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, R.: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.)Syntax and Semantics 10, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, G.: 1977, ‘Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (1)’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7. Cited from the reprint in G. Evans: 1985,Collected Papers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, G.: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11.Google Scholar
  6. Heim, I.: 1979, ‘Toward a Unified Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  7. Heim, I.: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published 1987, Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Heim, I.: 1983, ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’, in M. Barlow et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  9. Kadmon, N.: 1987,On Unique and Non-unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  10. Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Karttunen, L. and S. Peters: 1979, ‘Conventional Implicature’, in C. K. Oh and M. Dinneen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 11:Presupposition, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Kratzer, A.: 1978,Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie, Modalwörter, Konditionalsätze, Scripfor, Königstein.Google Scholar
  13. Kratzer, A.: 1981, ‘The Notional Category of Modality’, in H. Rieser and H. Eikmeyer (eds.),Words, Worlds, and Contexts, W. de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  14. Kratzer, A.: 1986, ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’, to appear inLinguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  15. Kratzer, A.: 1988, ‘Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Neale, S.: 1988,Descriptions, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  18. Parsons, T.: 1978, ‘Pronouns as Paraphrases’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  19. Partee, B.: 1978, ‘Bound Variables and other Anaphora’, in D. Waltz (ed.)Proceedings of TINLAP-2, University of Illinois Urbana.Google Scholar
  20. Reinhart, T.: 1987, ‘Specifier and Operator Binding’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.),The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Roberts, C.: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, C.: 1988, ‘Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse’, to appear inLinguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  23. Root, R.: 1986,The Semantics of Anaphora in Discourse, Ph.D. diss., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  24. Rooth, M.: 1987, ‘NP Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Sag, L: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge. Published 1980, Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Sells, P.: 1986, ‘Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of the Facts’, in S. Berman et al. (eds.),NELS 16, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  27. Soames, S.: 1987, ‘Presupposition’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic 4, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, E.: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’,Linguistic Inquiry 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene Heim
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of LinguisticsMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations