Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 137–177 | Cite as

E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora

  • Irene Heim
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Donkey Anaphora 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäuerle, R. and U. Egli: 1985, ‘Anapher, Nominalphrase und Eselssätze’, Papier 105 des Sonderforschungsbereichs 99, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
  2. Berman, S.: 1987, ‘Situation-Based Semantics for Adverbs of Quantification’, in J. Blevins and A. Vainikka (eds.),University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 12, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, R.: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.)Syntax and Semantics 10, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, G.: 1977, ‘Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (1)’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7. Cited from the reprint in G. Evans: 1985,Collected Papers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, G.: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11.Google Scholar
  6. Heim, I.: 1979, ‘Toward a Unified Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  7. Heim, I.: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published 1987, Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Heim, I.: 1983, ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’, in M. Barlow et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  9. Kadmon, N.: 1987,On Unique and Non-unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  10. Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Karttunen, L. and S. Peters: 1979, ‘Conventional Implicature’, in C. K. Oh and M. Dinneen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 11:Presupposition, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Kratzer, A.: 1978,Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie, Modalwörter, Konditionalsätze, Scripfor, Königstein.Google Scholar
  13. Kratzer, A.: 1981, ‘The Notional Category of Modality’, in H. Rieser and H. Eikmeyer (eds.),Words, Worlds, and Contexts, W. de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  14. Kratzer, A.: 1986, ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’, to appear inLinguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  15. Kratzer, A.: 1988, ‘Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Neale, S.: 1988,Descriptions, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  18. Parsons, T.: 1978, ‘Pronouns as Paraphrases’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  19. Partee, B.: 1978, ‘Bound Variables and other Anaphora’, in D. Waltz (ed.)Proceedings of TINLAP-2, University of Illinois Urbana.Google Scholar
  20. Reinhart, T.: 1987, ‘Specifier and Operator Binding’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.),The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Roberts, C.: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, C.: 1988, ‘Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse’, to appear inLinguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  23. Root, R.: 1986,The Semantics of Anaphora in Discourse, Ph.D. diss., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  24. Rooth, M.: 1987, ‘NP Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Sag, L: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge. Published 1980, Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Sells, P.: 1986, ‘Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of the Facts’, in S. Berman et al. (eds.),NELS 16, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  27. Soames, S.: 1987, ‘Presupposition’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic 4, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, E.: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’,Linguistic Inquiry 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene Heim
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of LinguisticsMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations