Study of interaction effects inAu-V alloys through susceptibility and specific heat measurements
- 18 Downloads
- 16 Citations
Abstract
We measured the magnetizationM of diluteAu-V alloys of concentration varying between 0.2 and 10 at.% at 4.2 K in fields up to 60 kOe.M is proportional to the field for all fields. The specific heat, measured between 0.4 and 3 K, shows a term linear in temperature γT, with γ=3.3 and 4.6 mJ · mole−1 · K−2 for the 5 and 10% V alloys, respectively. x and γ increase less rapidly than the vanadium concentration. In terms of different “magnetic” character between isolated impurities and nearest neighbors, the analysis of the specific heat results is consistent with a drastic reduction in thed spin susceptibility of V nearest neighbors by interaction effects, contrary to the case ofAu-Co,Cu-Co,Cu-Ni, andCu-Fe where interaction effects produce an enhancement of x. The fluctuation temperature of these two types of impurities is very different;T f ≃270 K for isolated V atoms andT f ≃2500 K for V nearest neighbors. The V atoms in group tend to have the same character as vanadium metal. The observed increase of the ratio ξ=(xdγ/dc)/(γdx/dc) from 0.2 for isolated atoms to 0.8 for V in group is consistent with the decrease of Hund's coupling.
Keywords
Vanadium Interaction Effect Magnetic Material Fluctuation Temperature Term LinearPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.E. Vogt and D. Gerstenberg,Ann. Physik 4, 145 (1959).Google Scholar
- 2.K. Kume,J. Phys. Soc. Japan 23, 1226 (1967).Google Scholar
- 3.L. Creveling, Jr., and H. L. Luo,Phys. Rev. 176, 614 (1968).Google Scholar
- 4.K. Kume and T. Zempo,J. Phys. Soc. Japan 22, 1115 (1967).Google Scholar
- 5.M. D. Daybell, D. L. Kohlstedt, and W. A. Steyert,Solid State Commun. 5, 871 (1967).Google Scholar
- 6.F. J. DuChatenier, J. DeNobel, and B. M. Boerstoel,Physica 32, 561 (1966).Google Scholar
- 7.W. M. Star, B. M. Boerstoel, and C. Van Baarle,J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1152 (1970).Google Scholar
- 8.N. Rivier and M. J. Zuckermann,Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 904 (1968).Google Scholar
- 9.B. Caroli, P. Lederer, and D. Saint-James,Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 700 (1969).Google Scholar
- 10.J. Souletie and R. Tournier,J. Phys. 32, Suppl. C1, 172 (1971).Google Scholar
- 11.J. E. Van Dam and P. C. M. Gubbens,Phys. Letters 34A, 185 (1971).Google Scholar
- 12.A. Narath and A. C. Gossard,Phys. Rev. 183, 391 (1969).Google Scholar
- 13.J. L. Tholence and B. Tissier, to be published.Google Scholar
- 14.K. H. Gobrecht, J. J. Veyssie, and L. Weil,Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae 210, 63 (1966).Google Scholar
- 15.D. L. Martin,Phys. Rev. 170, 650 (1968).Google Scholar
- 16.E. Boucai, B. Lecoanet, J. Pilon, J. L. Tholence, and R. Tournier,Phys. Rev. B3, 3834 (1971).Google Scholar
- 17.B. Caroli,J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28, 1427 (1967); D. J. Kim,J. Phys. 32, Suppl. C1, 755 (1971).Google Scholar
- 18.R. Huguenin and D. Baldock,Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 795 (1966).Google Scholar
- 19.K. Kume, M. Mizuno, and S. Kazama, to be published.Google Scholar
- 20.R. Radebaugh and P. H. Keesom,Phys. Rev. 149, 209 (1966).Google Scholar
- 21.A. A. Maradudin, E. Montroll, and G. H. Weiss,Solid State Physics, Supplement 3, F. Seitz and D. Turnbull, eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1963), Chap. V.Google Scholar
- 22.Y. Tanji,J. Phys. Soc. Japan 30, 133 (1971).Google Scholar
- 23.G. Chouteau, R. Fourneaux, R. Tournier, and P. Lederer,Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 1082 (1968).Google Scholar