Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 39–100 | Cite as

Dynamic predicate logic

  • Jeroen Groenendijk
  • Martin Stokhof

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barwise, J.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrases, Generalized Quantifiers and Anaphora’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, M. van den: 1990, ‘A Dynamic Predicate Logic for Plurals’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Chierchia, G.: 1988, ‘Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers and Donkey Anaphora’, in M. Krifka (ed.),Genericity in Natural Language, SNS, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  4. Chierchia, G.: 1990, ‘Anaphora and Dynamic Logic’. in J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof, G. Chierchia and P. Dekker,Quantification and Anaphora 11, Dyama-deliverable R2.2.a. Centre for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  5. Dekker, P.: 1990, ‘Dynamic Interpretation, Flexibility, and Monotonicity’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1988, ‘Context and Information in Dynamic Semantics’, in B. Elsendoorn and H. Bouma (eds.),Working Models of Human Perception, Academic Press, New York, pp. 457–488.Google Scholar
  7. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1990, ‘Dynamic Montague Grammar’, in L. Kálmán et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Budapest.Google Scholar
  8. Harel, D.: 1984, ‘Dynamic Logic’, in: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  9. Heim, I.: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  10. Heim, I.: 1983, ‘File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness’, in R. Bailerle, Ch. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Janssen, T.: 1986,Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar, CWI, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Kadmon, N. 1987,On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  13. Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322 [reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof (eds.), 1984,Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 1–41].Google Scholar
  14. Kamp, H.: 1983, ‘Situations in Discourse Without Time or Questions’, manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  16. Roberts, C.: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst,Google Scholar
  17. Roberts, C.: 1989, ‘Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse’,Linguistics and Philosophy,12, 683–723.Google Scholar
  18. Rooth, M.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 237–269.Google Scholar
  19. Schubert, L. and F. J. Pelletier: 1989, ‘Generally Speaking, or, Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics’, in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.),Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. 11, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 193–268.Google Scholar
  20. Seuren, P.: 1986,Discourse Semantics, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Zeevat, H.: 1989, ‘A Compositional Approach to Discourse Representation Theory’,Linguistics and Philosophy,12, 95–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeroen Groenendijk
    • 1
  • Martin Stokhof
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdam

Personalised recommendations