Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 641–475

Types of plural individuals

  • Roger Schwarzschild


  1. Bartsch, R.: 1973, ‘The Semantics and Syntax of Number and Numbers’, in J. Kimball (ed.),Syntax and Semantics, Vol 2, Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, M.: 1974, ‘Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English’, University of California at Los Angeles, dissertation.Google Scholar
  4. Dougherty, R. C.: 1970, ‘A Grammar of Coordinate Conjoined Structures: I’,Language 46 (4), 850–898.Google Scholar
  5. Fiengo, R. and H. Lasnik: 1973, ‘The Logical Structure of Reciprocal Sentences in English’,Foundations of Language,9, 447–468.Google Scholar
  6. Hendriks, H.: 1988, ‘Type Change Semantics: the Scope of Quantification and Coordination’, in Klein nad v. Benthem (eds.),Categories, Polymorphism and Unification, University of Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Science and Amsterdam: Institute for Language, Logic and Information.Google Scholar
  7. Hoeksema, J.: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunction’, in ter Meulen (ed.),Student in, Model theoretic Semantics GRASS 1, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 63–83.Google Scholar
  8. Jackendoff, R.: 1972,Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, M.I.T. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, E.: 1987, ‘VP Ellipsis in DR Theory’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof,Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, GRASS 8, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 161–187.Google Scholar
  10. Landman, F.: 1989, ‘Groups I’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5), 559–506Google Scholar
  11. Langendoen, D. T.: 1978, ‘The Logic of Reciprocity’,Linguistic Injury 9(2), 177–197.Google Scholar
  12. Laserohn, P.: 1988, ‘A Semantics for Groups and Events’, Ohio State University disseration.Google Scholar
  13. Leonard, H. and N. Goodman 1940: ‘The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses’,Journal of Symbolic Logic,5, 45–56.Google Scholar
  14. Levinson, S. C.: 1983,Pragmatics, Cambridge Unviersity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339–59. [Reprinted in Lewis, D. (1983)Philosophical Papers, Vol I, Oxford University Press, Oxoford.]Google Scholar
  16. Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.Google Scholar
  17. Link, G.: 1984, ‘Hydras. On the Logic of Relative Clause Constructions with Multiple Heads’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, GRASS 3, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 245–257.Google Scholar
  18. Link, G.: (to appear), ‘Plural’, in Wunderlich and von Stechow (ededs.),Handbook of Semantics (Handbuch der Semantik).Google Scholar
  19. Lønning, J. T.: 1989, ‘Some Aspects of the Logic of Plural Noun Phrases’, COSMOS-Report No. 11, Department of Mathematics, Univesrity of Oslo, Oslo: Norway.Google Scholar
  20. Partee, B. and M. Rooth, 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 361–383.Google Scholar
  21. Prüst, H. and R. Scha: 1990, ‘A Discourse Perspective on Verb Phrase Anaphora’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, Institute for Language, Logic and Information, Universiteit van Amsterdam, pp. 451–474.Google Scholar
  22. Quine, W. V. O.: 1980Set Theory and Its Logic, Revised Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Roberts, C.: 1987, ‘Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity’, University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation. Distributed by the Graduate Linguistics Student Association.Google Scholar
  24. Rooth, M.: 1985, ‘Association with Focus’, University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation. Distributed by the Graduate Linguistics Student Association.Google Scholar
  25. Russell, B.: 1903,Principles of Mathematics, Second Edition, New York, Norton, 1938.Google Scholar
  26. Scha, R.: 1984, ‘Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds),Truth, Interpertation, and Information, GRASS 2, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 131–158.Google Scholar
  27. Schwarzschild, R.: 1991, ‘On the Meaning of Definite Plural Noun Phrases’, University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
  28. Sharvy, R.: 1980, ‘A More General Theory and Definite Descriptions’,The Philosophical Review 89 (4), 607–624.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, N. L.: 1953, ‘The Identity of Indiscernibles and the Symmetrical Universe’,Mild 62, 506–511.Google Scholar
  30. Zwicky, A. M. and J. M. Sadock: 1975, ‘Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them’, in J. Kimball (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Schwarzschild
    • 1
  1. 1.English DepartmentThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations