Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 597–639 | Cite as

Towards a common semantics for english count and mass nouns

  • Brendan S. Gillon


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Mass Noun Common Semantic English Count 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, James C.: 1969,Sets, Lattices, and Boolean Algebras, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Akmajian, Adrian and Adrienne Lehrer: 1976, ‘NP-like Quantifiers and the Problem of Determining the Head of an NP’,Linguistic Analysis 2, 395–413.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Carl Lee: 1978,Introduction to Generative-Transformational Syntax, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  4. Bäuerle, Rainer, Christoph Schwarze and Arnim von Stechow (eds.): 1983,Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, Michael: 1979, ‘Mass Nouns and Mass Terms in Montague Grammar’, in Davis and Mithun (eds.), pp. 263–285. Bunt, Cornelis Hendrik: 1979, ‘Ensembles and the Formal Semantic Properties of Mass Terms’, in Pelletier (ed.), pp. 249–278.Google Scholar
  6. Bunt, Cornelis Hendrik: 1981,The Formal Semantics of Mass Terms, dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Bunt, Cornelis Hendrik: 1985,Mass Terms and Model-Theoretical Semantics, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics: vol. 42, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, Greg: 1977a, ‘A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413–457.Google Scholar
  9. Carlson, Greg: 1977b,References to Kinds in English, unpublished PhD dissertation, reprinted with revisions as Carlson, 1980, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, Greg: 1980,References to Kinds in English, reprint with revisions of Carlson, 1977b, Garland Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Carlson, Greg, Henry Kyburg and Ron Loui (eds.): 1989,Defeasible Reasoning and Knowledge Representation, Studies in Cognitive Systems: vol. 5, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Carlson, Lauri: 1980, Plural Quantification, unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Cartwright, Helen: 1975a, ‘Some Remarks about Mass Nouns and Plurality’,Synthese 31, 395–410, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
  14. Cartwright, Helen: 1975b, ‘Amounts and Measures of Amounts’,Nods 9, 143–163, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 179–198.Google Scholar
  15. Cheng, C. Y.: 1973, ‘Response to Moravscik’, in Hintikka et al. (eds.), pp. 286–288.Google Scholar
  16. Copi, Irving: 1953,Introduction to Logic, 6th ed., 1982, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, H. and E. Clark: 1979, ‘When Nouns Surface as Verbs’,Language,55, 767–811.Google Scholar
  18. Culicover, Peter W, Thomas Wasow and Adrian Akmajian (eds.): 1977,Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, Steven and Marianne Mithun (eds.): 1979,Linguistics, Philosophy and Montague Grammar, University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  20. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams: 1987,On the Definition of Word, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 14, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, Gareth: 1977, ‘Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 467–536, 777–797.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, Gareth: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.Google Scholar
  23. Fodor, Janet Dean and Ivan Sag: 1982, ‘Referential and Quantificational Indefinites’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 335–398.Google Scholar
  24. Follett, Wilson: 1966,Modern American Usage: A Guide, Hill & Wang, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Gabbay, Dov and Franz Guenthner (eds.): 1989,Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume IV: Topics in the Philosophy of Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  26. Gillon, Brendan S.: 1987, ‘The Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 199–220.Google Scholar
  27. Gillon, Brendan S.: 1989, ‘Bare Plurals as Plural Indefinite Noun Phrases’, in Carlson et al. (eds.), pp. 119–166.Google Scholar
  28. Gillen, Brendan S.: 1990, ‘Plural Noun phrases and Their Readings: A Reply to Lasersohn’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 477–485.Google Scholar
  29. Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik and Robert May: 1988, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–102.Google Scholar
  30. Higginbotham, James: 1981, ‘Reciprocal Interpretation’,Linguistic Research 3, 97–117.Google Scholar
  31. Higginbotham, James: 1983, ‘LF, Binding and Nominals’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 395–420.Google Scholar
  32. Hintikka, Jaakko, Julius Moravscik and Patrick Suppes (eds.): 1973,Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  33. Hoeksema, Jack: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunction’, in ter Meulen (ed.), pp. 63–83.Google Scholar
  34. Jackendoff, Ray: 1977, Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  35. Jespersen, Otto: 1909,A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, 7 vols., Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  36. Jesperson, Otto: 1924,The Philosophy of Grammar, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  37. Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups I’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–606.Google Scholar
  38. Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups II’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 723–744.Google Scholar
  39. Landman, Fred and Frank Veltman (eds.): 1984,Varieties of Formal Semantics, Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics, n. 3, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  40. Langendoen, D. Terence: 1978, ‘The Logic of Reciprocity’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 177–197.Google Scholar
  41. Lasersohn, Peter: 1990, ‘On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 130–133.Google Scholar
  42. LePore, Ernie (ed.): 1987,New Directions in Semantics, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  43. Lieber, Rochelle: 1992,Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  44. Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretic Approach’, in Bäuerle et al. (eds.), pp. 302–323.Google Scholar
  45. Link, Godehard: 1984, ‘Hydras. On the Logic of Relative Constructions with Multiple Heads’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), pp. 245–257.Google Scholar
  46. Link, Godehard: forthcoming, ‘Plural’, in van Stechow and Wunderlich (eds.), ch. 9.Google Scholar
  47. Lobel, Arnold: 1981,Uncle Elephant, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Lønning, Jan Tore: 1987, ‘Mass Terms and Quantification’.Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 1–52.Google Scholar
  49. McCawley, James D.: 1982, ‘Parentheticals and Discountinuous Constituent Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91–106.Google Scholar
  50. Parsons, Terence: 1970, ‘An Analysis of Mass Terms and Amount Terms’,Foundations of Language 6, 362–388, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 137–166.Google Scholar
  51. Pelletier, Francis J.: 1974, ‘On Some Proposals for the Semantics of Mass Terms’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 87–108.Google Scholar
  52. Pelletier, Francis J.: 1975, ‘Non-Singular Reference: Some Preliminaries’,Philosphia 5, 451–465, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  53. Pelletier, Francis J. (ed.): 1979,Mass Terms: Philosophical Problems, Synthese Language Library, vol. 6, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  54. Pelletier, Francis J.and Lenhart Schubert: 1987,Three Papers on the Logical Form of Mass Ternes, Generics, Bare Plurals, and Habituals, Technical Report No. TR 87-3, Department of Computing Science.Google Scholar
  55. Pelletier, Francis J. and Lenhart Schubert: 1989, ‘Mass Expressions’, in Dov Gabbay and Franz Guenthner (eds.), pp. 327–408.Google Scholar
  56. Quine, Willard V.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  57. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartik: 1985,A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  58. Roberts, Craige: 1987,Modal subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  59. Roeper, Peter: 1983, ‘Semantics for Mass Terms with Quantifiers’,Noûs 22, 251–265.Google Scholar
  60. Russell, Bertrand: 1903,The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd ed., 1936, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  61. Schubert, Lenhart K. and Francis Jeffrey Pelletier: 1987, ‘Problems in the Representation of the Logical form of Generics, Plurals, and Mass Nouns’, in Pelletier and Schubert (eds.), pp. 101–184, also in Ernest LePore (ed.), pp. 387–453.Google Scholar
  62. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.: 1977, ‘Some Remarks on Noun Phrase Structure’, in Culicover et al. (eds.), pp. 285–325.Google Scholar
  63. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.: 1982,The Syntax of Words, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 7, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  64. Simons, Peter M.: 1982a, ‘Number and Manifolds, in Smith (ed.), pp. 160–198.Google Scholar
  65. Simons, Peter M.: 1982b, ‘Plural Reference and Set Theory’, in Smith (ed.), pp. 198–260.Google Scholar
  66. Simons, Peter: 1987,Parts: A Study in Ontology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, Barry (ed.): 1982,Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Philosophia (Analytica), Munich.Google Scholar
  68. von Stechow, Arnim and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.): 1991,Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, De Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  69. ter Meulen, Alice: 1981, ‘An Intensional Logic for Mass Terms’,Philosophical Studies 40, 105–125.Google Scholar
  70. ter Meulen, Alice (ed.): 1983,Studies in model Theoretic Semantics, Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics, n. 1, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  71. Vendler, Zeno: 1967,Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Wilson, Robin J.: 1972,Introduction to Graph Theory, 2nd ed., 1979, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  73. Zaefferer, Dietmar: 1987, ‘Bare Plurals, Naked Relatives, and their Kin’, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Report No. CSLI-87-112, Stanford, California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brendan S. Gillon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations