Trapped-ion motion in helium II
- 36 Downloads
- 33 Citations
Abstract
We present the results of a series of experiments on the mobility of negative ions trapped on quantized vortex lines in superfluid helium. Trapped-ion mobilities were measured as a function of temperature, pressure, and He3 concentration. Some of the experimental data have been previously reported.1,2 The temperature and pressure dependence of trapped-ion mobilities is qualitatively different than that of free ions. The He3 data strongly suggest that the negative ion bubble does not become deformed on the vortex line. We present a model for a vortex line having a central “core” of normal fluid extending over a distance of several angstroms surrounded by a “tail,” a region of excess roton density whose momenta are predominantly aligned opposite to the direction of circulation of the superfluid. This model is used to calculate the drag on a negative ion trapped on a vortex line. The model appears to account for the experimental results satisfactorily.
Keywords
Experimental Data Vortex Helium Magnetic Material Pressure DependencePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.W. I. Glaberson, D. M. Strayer, and R. J. Donnelly,Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1428 (1968).Google Scholar
- 2.W. I. Glaberson, D. M. Strayer, and R. J. Donnelly,Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 1740 (1968).Google Scholar
- 3.R. J. Donnelly, W. I. Glaberson, and P. E. Parks,Experimental Superfluidity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1967).Google Scholar
- 4.R. J. Donnelly and P. H. Roberts (to be published).Google Scholar
- 5.P. E. Parks and R. J. Donnelly,Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 45 (1966).Google Scholar
- 6.R. L. Douglass,Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 791 (1964).Google Scholar
- 7.J. J. Domingo and R. J. Donnelly,Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11, 479 (1966).Google Scholar
- 8.D. J. Tanner,Phys. Rev. 152, 121 (1966).Google Scholar
- 9.R. L. Douglass,Phys. Rev. 174, 255 (1968).Google Scholar
- 10.F. Reif and L. Meyer,Phys. Rev. 119, 1164 (1960).Google Scholar
- 11.B. E. Springett,Phys. Rev. 155, 139 (1967).Google Scholar
- 12.C. Zipfel and T. M. Sanders, Jr.,Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Low Temperature Physics, to be published; and private communication.Google Scholar
- 13.D. G. Henshaw and A. D. B. Woods,Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Low Temperature Physics (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1961), p. 539.Google Scholar
- 14.L. Meyer and F. Reif,Phys. Rev. 123, 727 (1961).Google Scholar
- 15.R. P. Feynman,Phys. Rev. 94, 262 (1954).Google Scholar
- 16.J. L. Yarnell, G. P. Arnold, P. J. Bendt, and E. C. Kerr,Phys. Rev. 113, 1379 (1959).Google Scholar
- 17.P. J. Bendt, R. D. Cowan, and J. L. Yarnell,Phys. Rev. 113, 1386 (1959).Google Scholar
- 18.L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, Mass., 1959), pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
- 19.H. H. Tjerkstra,Physica 17, 853 (1952).Google Scholar
- 20.H. E. Hall,Phil. Mag. Suppl. 9, 89 (1960).Google Scholar
- 21.S. V. Iordanskii,Zh. Eksperim. i. Teor. Fiz. 48, 708 (1965);Soviet Phys.—JETP 21, 467 (1965).Google Scholar
- 22.H. Roberts and R. J. Donnelly (to be published).Google Scholar
- 23.E. P. Gross,Nuovo Cimento 20, 454 (1961).Google Scholar
- 24.A. L. Fetter,Phys. Rev. 138, A709 (1965).Google Scholar
- 25.V. L. Ginsburg and L. P. Pitaevskii,Soviet Phys.—JETP 7, 858 (1958).Google Scholar