Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 325–362 | Cite as

The concept of phrase structure

  • Alexis Manaster-Ramer
  • Michael B. Kac
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, E.: 1981, ‘Discontinuous Constituents in Generalized Categorial Grammar’,Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of the New England Linguistic Society, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Bar-Hillel, Y., M. Perles, and E. Shamir: 1961, ‘On Formal Properties of Simple Phrase Structure Grammars’,Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 14, 143–172.Google Scholar
  3. Berwick, R. and A. Weinberg: 1982, ‘Parsing Efficiency, Computational Complexity, and the Evaluation of Grammatical Theories’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 165–91.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, B.: 1946, ‘Studies in Colloquial Japanese II: Syntax’,Language 12, 200–48.Google Scholar
  5. Bloomfield, L.: 1914,An Introduction to the Study of Language, Henry Holt and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  6. Bloomfield, L.: 1933,Language, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Bloomfield, L.: 1962, The Menomini Language, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  8. Bresnan, J., R. M. Kaplan, S. Peters, and A. Zaenen: 1982, ‘Cross-serial Dependencies in Dutch’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 613–35.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N.: 1956, ‘Three Models for the Description of Language’,IRE Transactions on Information Theory,IT-2, 113–24. Reprinted 1965, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.), Readings in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 105–24, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1957,Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1959, ‘On Certain Formal Properties of Grammars’,Information and Control 1, 91–112. Reprinted 1965, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.), Readings in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 124–55, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N.: 1961, ‘On the Notion “Rule of Grammar”’, in R. Jakobson (ed.),Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, vol. XII:Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, pp. 6–24, American Mathematical Society, Providence.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N.: 1962a, ‘The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory’, inPreprints of Papers for the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, August 27–31, 1962, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 509–74, [Massachusetts Institute of Technology?], Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N.: 1962b, ‘A Transformational Approach to Syntax’, in [A. A. Hill, (ed.)]Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English, May 9–12, 1958, pp. 124–158, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N.: 1963, ‘Formal Properties of Grammars’, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 323–418, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Chomsky, N.: 1964, ‘The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory’, in H. G. Lunt (ed.),Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, Cambridge, Mass., August 27–31, 1962, pp. 914–978, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  17. Chomsky, N.: 1965,Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Chomsky, N.: 1966,Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  19. Chomsky, N.: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.),Readings in English Transformational Grammar, pp. 184–221, Ginn, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Chomsky, N. and G. A. Miller: 1963, ‘Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages’, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 269–322, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Gazdar, G.: 1981, ‘Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155–84.Google Scholar
  22. Gazdar, G.: 1982, ‘Phrase Structure Grammar’, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.),The Nature of Syntactic Represesentation, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Gazdar, G.: 1985, ‘Applicability of Indexed Grammars to Natural Languages’, CSLI Report 85-34, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Gazdar, G., and G. K. Pullum: 1982,GPSG: A Theoretical Synopsis, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  25. Gazdar, G. and G. K. Pullum: 1985, ‘Computationally Relevant Properties of Natural Languages and Their Grammars’,New Generation Computing 3, 273–306.Google Scholar
  26. Gazdar, G., and I. A. Sag: 1980, ‘Passives and Reflexives in Phrase Structure Grammar’, in J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Center Tracts 135, pp. 131–52, Mathematisch Centrum, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  27. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. K. Pullum, and I. A. Sag: 1985,Generalised Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Harman, G. H.: 1963, ‘Generative Grammars without Transformation Rules: A Defense of Phrase Structure’,Language 39, 597–616.Google Scholar
  29. Harman, G. H.: 1966, ‘The Adequacy of Context-Free Phrase-Structure Grammars’,Word 22, 276–293.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, Z. S.: 1945, ‘Discontinuous Morphemes’,Languages 21, 121–27.Google Scholar
  31. Harris, Z. S.: 1946, ‘From Morpheme to Utterance’,Language 22, 161–83.Google Scholar
  32. Harris, Z. S.: 1951,Methods in Structural Linguistics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, Z. S.: 1962,String Analysis, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  34. Harrison, M. A.: 1978,Introduction to Formal Language Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  35. Hockett, C. F.: 1954, ‘Two Models of Grammatical Description’,Word 10, 210–31.Google Scholar
  36. Hockett, C. F.: 1958,A Course in Modern Linguistics, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Hockett, C. F.: 1961, ‘Grammar for the Hearer’. in R. Jakobson (ed.),Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, vol. XII:Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, pp. 220–236, American Mathematical Society, Providence.Google Scholar
  38. Hopcroft, J. E. and J. D. Ullman: 1979,Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Huck, G. J. and A. E. Ojeda (eds.): 1987,Discontinuous Constituency [=Syntax and Semantics,20, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  40. Hudson, R. A.: 1976,Arguments for a Non transformational Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. Hudson, R. A.: 1984,Word Grammar, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Joshi, A. K.: 1983, ‘How Much Context-Sensitivity is Required to Provide Reasonable Structural Descriptions: Tree-Adjoining Grammars’, in D. Dowry, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.),Natural Language Parsing: Psycholinguistic, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives, pp. 190–204, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kac, M. B.: 1985a,Grammars and Grammaticality, unpublished ms., University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  44. Kac, M. B.: 1985b, ‘Constraints on Predicate Coordination’, Indiana University of Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  45. Kleene, S. C.: 1956, ‘Representation of Events in Nerve Nets and Finite Automata’,Automata Studies, pp. 3–42, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  46. Lamb, S. M.: 1962,Outline of Stratificational Grammar, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  47. Manaster-Ramer, A.: 1978, ‘The Position of the Verb in Dutch and German’,Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting, pp. 254–63, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
  48. Manaster-Ramer, A.: 1987, ‘Dutch as a Formal Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  49. McCawley, J. D.: 1968, ‘Concerning the Base Component of a Transformational Grammar’,Foundations of Language 4, 243–269.Google Scholar
  50. McCawley, J. D.: 1982, ‘Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91–106.Google Scholar
  51. Ojeda, A.: 1987, ‘Discontinuity and Phrase Structure’, in A. Manaster-Ramer (ed.),Mathematics of Language, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  52. Percival, W. K.: 1976, ‘On the Historical Source of Immediate Constituent Analysis’, in J. D. McCawley (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 7:Notes from the Linguistic Underground, pp. 229–242, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Peters, S. and R. Ritchie: 1969, ‘Context-sensitive Immediate Constituent Analysis — Context-free Languages Revisited’,Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  54. Peters, S. and R. Ritchie: 1973, ‘On the Generative Power of Transformational Grammars’,Information Sciences 6, 49–83.Google Scholar
  55. Pike, K. L.: 1954–60,Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, Summer Institute of Linguistics, Glendale, CA., 3 parts.Google Scholar
  56. Postal, P. M.: 1964a,Constituent Structure: A Study of Contemporary Models of Syntactic Description, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  57. Postal, P. M.: 1964b, ‘Limitations of Phrase Structure Grammars’, in J. A. Fedor and J. J. Katz (eds.),The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 137–51, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  58. Pullum, G. K. and G. Gazdar: 1982, ‘Natural Languages and Context-free Languages’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 471–504.Google Scholar
  59. Révész, G.: 1976, ‘A Note on the Relation of Turing Machines to Phrase Structure Grammars’,Computational Linguistics and Computer Languages 11, 11–16.Google Scholar
  60. Rounds, W. C., A. Manaster-Ramer, and J. Friedman: 1987, ‘Finding Natural Languages a Home in Formal Language Theory’, in A. Manaster-Ramer (ed.),Mathematics of Language, pp. 349–59, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  61. Savitch, W. J., E. Bach, W. Marsh, and G. Safran-Naveh (eds.): 1988,The Formal Complexity of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  62. Uszkoreit, H. and S. Peters: 1986, ‘On Some Formal Properties of Metarules’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 477–94.Google Scholar
  63. Wasow, T.: 1978, ‘On Constraining the Class of Transformational Languages’,Synthese 39, 81–104.Google Scholar
  64. Well, R. S.: 1947, ‘Immediate Constituents’,Language 23, 81–117.Google Scholar
  65. Yngve, V. H.: 1960, ‘A Model and an Hypothesis for Language Structure’,Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104, 444–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexis Manaster-Ramer
    • 1
  • Michael B. Kac
    • 2
  1. 1.T. J. Watson Research Center IBM CorporationYorktown HeightsUSA
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of MinnesotaMineapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations