Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 273–324 | Cite as

Uniqueness

  • Nirit Kadmon
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäuerle, Rainer and Urs Egli: 1985, ‘Anapher, Nominalphrase und Eselsätze’,Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 99, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, Robin: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in F. Heny and H.S. Schnelle (eds.),Syntax & Semantics 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, Academic Press, New York, pp. 61–92.Google Scholar
  3. Donnellan, Keith: 1978, ‘Speaker Reference, Descriptions and Anaphora’, in P. Cole (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
  4. van Eijck, Jan: 1983, ‘Discourse Representation Theory and Plurality’, in A. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Model Theoretic Semantics, GRASS 1, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–103Google Scholar
  5. Evans, Gareth: 1977, ‘Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 467–536.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, Gareth: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.Google Scholar
  7. Heim, Irene; 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, reproduced by the GLSA, Linguistics Dept., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  8. Heim, Irene: 1983, ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’, in M. Barlow, D. Flickinger and M. Wescoat (eds.),Proceedings of WCCFL 2, Stanford University, pp. 114–125. Horn, Laurence: 1972,On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA. Reproduced by the IULC, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Kadmon, Nirit: 1985, ‘The Discourse Representation of NPs with Numeral Determiners’, in S. Berman, J. Choe and J. McDonough (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 15, GLSA, Linguistics Dept., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 207–219.Google Scholar
  10. Kadmon, Nirit: 1987a,On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, reproduced by the GLSA, Linguistics Dept., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  11. Kadmon, Nirit: 1987b, ‘Asymmetric Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof and F. Veltman (eds.),Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI publication, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Kamp, Hans: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language: Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Part I, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam, pp. 277–321. Reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information, GRASS 2, Foris, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  13. Kratzer, Angelika: 1989, ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.Google Scholar
  14. Kripke, Saul: 1965, ‘Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic, I’, in J. N. Crossley and M. Dummett (eds.),Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 92–130.Google Scholar
  15. Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups, I’ and ‘Groups, II’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–605 and 723–744.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, David: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. L. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, David: 1979, ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’, in R. Bäuerle, U. Egli and A. von Stechow (eds.),Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 172–185.Google Scholar
  18. Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: a Lattice-Theoretic Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.Google Scholar
  19. Link, Godehard: to appear, ‘Plural’, in D. Wunderlich and A. von Stechow (eds.),Handbook of Semantics (Handbuch der Semantik).Google Scholar
  20. Löbner, Sebastian: 1987, ‘Definites’,Journal of Semantics 4, 279–326.Google Scholar
  21. Partee, Barbara H.: 1978, ‘Bound Variables and Other Anaphors’, in D. Waltz (ed.),Proceedings of TINLAP-2, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  22. Partee, Barbara H.: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.Google Scholar
  23. Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, ‘Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of the Anaphora Question’,Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47–88.Google Scholar
  24. Reinhart, Tanya: 1986, ‘On the Interpretation of ‘Donkey’ — Sentences’, in E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reily and C. A. Ferguson (eds.),On Conditionals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, Craige: 1985. ‘On the Assignment of Indices and their Interpretation in Binding Theory’, in S. Berman, J. Choe and J. McDonough (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 15, GLSA, Linguistics Dept., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 362–376.Google Scholar
  26. Roberts, Craige: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, reproduced by the GLSA, Linguistics Dept., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  27. Roberts, Craige: 1989, ‘Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 683–721.Google Scholar
  28. Rooth, Mats: 1986, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics’, report No. CSLI-86-15, CSLI, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, Bertrand: 1905, ‘On Denoting’,Mind 14, 479–493.Google Scholar
  30. Searle, John: 1969,Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Sells, Peter: 1985, ‘Restrictive and Non-Restrictive Modification’, report No. CSLI-85-28, CSLI, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  32. Strawson, Peter F.: 1950, ‘On Referring’,Mind 59, 320–344.Google Scholar
  33. Vendler, Zeno: 1967, ‘Singular Terms’, in Z. Vendler,Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Webber, Bonnie: 1984, ‘So What Can We Talk About Now?’, in M. Brady and R. Berwick (eds.),Computational Models of Discourse, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nirit Kadmon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Foreign Literatures and LinguisticsBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations