Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 213–241 | Cite as

The progressive in English: Events, states and processes

  • Terence Parsons


This paper has two goals. The first is to formulate an adequate account of the semantics of the progressive aspect in English: the semantics of ‘Agatha is making a cake’, as opposed to ‘Agatha makes a cake’. This account presupposes a version of the so-called “Aristotelian” classification of verbs in English into EVENT, PROCESS and STATE verbs. The second goal of this paper is to refine this classification so as to account for the infamous “category switch” problem, the problem of how it is that modification of a verb like ‘run’ by an adverbial like ‘to the store’ can turn a PROCESS phrase (‘run’) into an EVENT phrase (‘run to the store’). Views discussed include those of Aqvist, Bach, Bennett, Bennett and Partee, Dowry, Montague and Scott, and Vendler.


Artificial Intelligence State Verb Computational Linguistic Adequate Account Progressive Aspect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aqvist, L.: 1977, ‘On the Analysis of Some Accomplishment and Activity Verbs'’ in Rohrer (1977).Google Scholar
  2. Bach, E.: 1979, ‘Topics in English Metaphysics’, 1979 draft. Revised versions of parts appear in Bach (1981), (1986a), (1986b).Google Scholar
  3. Bach, E.: 1981, ‘On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics’, in Peter Cole (ed.),Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, E.: 1983, ‘On the Relationship between Word-grammar and Phrase-grammar’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 65–80.Google Scholar
  5. Bach, E.: 1986a, ‘The Algebra of Events’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, E.: 1986b, ‘Natural Language Metaphysics’, in Ruth Barcan-Marcus, Georg J. W. Dorn and Paul Weingartner (eds.),Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science VII, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 573–95.Google Scholar
  7. Bartsch, R.: 1976,The Grammar of Adverbials, North Holland, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, M.: 1977, ‘A Guide to the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English’,Logique et Analyse 20, 491–517.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, M.: 1981, ‘Of Tense and Aspect: One Analysis’, in Tedeschi and Zaenen (eds.), pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, M. and B. Partee: 1978,Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, O.: 1981, ‘On the Definition of the Telic-Atelic (Bounded-Nonbounded) Distinction’, in Tedeschi and Zaenen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics: Volume 14,Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.),The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted in Davidson (1980).Google Scholar
  13. Dowty, D.: 1977, ‘Toward a Semantic Analysis of Verb Aspect and the English ‘Imperfective Paradox’’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 45–78.Google Scholar
  14. Dowty, D.: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, D. Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Dowty, D.: 1982, ‘Tenses, Time Adverbs, and Compositional Semantic Theory’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 23–55.Google Scholar
  16. Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘The Logic of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’,Journal of Philosophy LXXX, 100–127.Google Scholar
  17. Kenny, A.: 1963,Action, Emotion and Will, Humanities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Montague, R.: 1974, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in Formal Philosophy, Yale, New Haven.Google Scholar
  19. Mourelatos, A.: 1978, ‘Events, Processes, and States’,Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415–34.Google Scholar
  20. Parsons, T.: 1980, ‘Modifiers and Quantifiers in Natural Language’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume VI, 29–60.Google Scholar
  21. Parsons, T.: 1985, ‘Underlying Events in the Logical Analysis of English’, in LePore and McLaughlin (eds.),Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Parsons, T.: in progress,Events in the Semantics of English.Google Scholar
  23. Partee, B.: 1976, ‘Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar’, in Partee (ed.),Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Ramsey, F. P.: 1927, ‘Facts and Propositions’, inThe Foundations of Mathematics, Littlefield, Adams & Co., Paterson, New Jersey, (1960).Google Scholar
  25. Reichenbach, H.: 1947,Elements of Symbolic Logic, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Ritchie, G.: 1979, ‘Temporal Clauses in English’, de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Ryle, G.: 1949,The Concept of Mind, Barnes & Noble, London.Google Scholar
  28. Tedeschi, P.: 1981, ‘Some Evidence for a Branching-Futures Semantic Model’, in P. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics: Volume 14,Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Thomason, R.: 1976, ‘Some Extensions of Montague Grammar’ in Partee (ed.).Google Scholar
  30. Vendler, Z.: 1967,Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Vlach, F.: 1981, ‘The Semantics of the Progressive’ in Tedeschi and Zaenen (eds.), pp. 271–92.Google Scholar
  32. Vlach, F.: 1983, ‘On Situation Semantics for Perception’,Synthese 54, 129–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence Parsons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of California IrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations