Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 619–659 | Cite as

Phrase structure parameters

  • Janet Dean Fodor
  • Stephen Crain


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Phrase Structure Phrase Structure Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abney, S.: 1987,The English Noun Phrase and Its Sentential Aspect, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Berwick, R. C.: 1985,The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Borer, H.: 1984,Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N.: 1986,Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N.: 1986,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N.: 1988,Language and the Problem of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  8. Fodor, J. D.: 1986, ‘Learning the Periphery’, in R. M. Vago (ed.),CUNY Forum 12, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fodor, J. D.: 1989, ‘Learning the Periphery’, (Extended and revised version of Fodor, 1986), in R. J. Matthews and W. Demopoulos (eds.),Learnability and Linguistic Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, J. D.: in press, a, ‘Parameters and Parameter Setting in a Phrase Structure Grammar’, to appear in J. deVilliers and L. Frazier (eds.),Language Acquisition and Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Fodor, J. D: in press, b, ‘Learnability of Phrase Structure Grammars’, to appear in R. Levine (ed.),Formal Linguistics: Theory and Implementation, Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Vol. ?, UBC Press, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  12. Fodor, J. D. and S. Crain: in prep.,On The Form of Innate Linguistic Knowledge, to be published by Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Gazdar, G. and G. K. Pullum: 1982, ‘Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar: A Theoretical Synopsis’, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  14. Gazdar, G. and G. K. Pullum: 1985, ‘Computationally Relevant Properties of Natural Languages and their Grammars’, CSLI Report No. 85-24, Stanford University, California.Google Scholar
  15. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. K. Pullum and I. A. Sag: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Goodall, G.: in press, ‘X'-Internal Word Order in Mandarin Chinese and Universal Grammar’, to appear inLinguistics, special issue on Chinese syntax.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, J. A.: 1982, ‘Cross-category Harmony, X-Bar, and the Predictions of Markedness’,Journal of Linguistics 18.1, 1–35.Google Scholar
  18. Hawkins, J. A.: 1983,Word Order Universals, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Hyams, N. M.: 1986a,Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Hyams, N. M.: 1986b, ‘The Acquisition of Inflection: A Parameter-Setting Approach’, paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
  21. Jackendoff, R. S.: 1977,X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  22. Jaeggli, O. and K. J. Safir: 1989a, ‘The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.),The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Jaeggli, O. and K. J. Safir (eds.): 1989b,The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Kayne, R. S.: 1981, ‘Unambiguous Paths’, in R. May and J. Koster (eds.),Levels of Syntactic Representation, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Kayne, R. S.: 1989, ‘Null Subjects and Clitic Climbing’, in Jaeggli and Safir (1989b).Google Scholar
  26. Koopman, H.: 1983,The Syntax of Verbs, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  27. Lasnik, H. and M. Saito: 1984, ‘On the Nature of Proper Government’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–289.Google Scholar
  28. Lasnik, H. and J. Uriagereka: 1988,A Course in GB Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Lust, B.: 1983, ‘On the Notion “Principle Branching Direction”, a Parameter of Universal Grammar’, in Y. Otsu, H. van Riemsdijk, K. Inoue and N. Kawasaki (eds.),Studies in Generative Grammar and Language Acquisition, International Christian University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  30. Manzini, M. R. and K. Wexler: 1987, ‘Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability’,Linguistic Inquiry,18, 413–444.Google Scholar
  31. Muysken, P.: 1983, ‘Parameterizing the Notion“Head”’,Journal of Linguistic Research 2, 57–76.Google Scholar
  32. Ojeda, A. E.: 1988, ‘A Linear Precedence Account of Cross-serial Dependencies’,Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 457–492.Google Scholar
  33. Pinker, S.: 1984,Language Learnability and Language Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  34. Pollard, C. and I. A. Sag: 1987,Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 1, Fundamentals, CSLI Lecture Notes No. 13, Stanford University, California.Google Scholar
  35. Postal, P. M. and G. K. Pullum: 1988, ‘Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 635–670.Google Scholar
  36. Pullum, G. K.: 1985, ‘Assuming Some Version of the X-bar Theory’, Syntax Research Center Report No. SRC-85-01, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.Google Scholar
  37. Pullum, G. K. and G. Gazdar: 1982, ‘Natural Language and Context-free Languages’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 471–504.Google Scholar
  38. Rappaport, M. and B. Levin: 1988, ‘What to do with θ-roles’, in W. Wilkins (ed.),Thematic Relations, Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 21, Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  39. Sells, P.: 1885,Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories: An Introduction to Government-Binding Theory, Generalized Phrased Structure Grammar, and Lexical-Functional Grammar;CSLI Lecture Notes Number 3, Stanford University, Stanford, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  40. Shieber, S. M.: 1984, ‘Direct Parsing of ID/LP Grammars’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 135–154.Google Scholar
  41. Shieber, S. M.: 1985, ‘Evidence Against the Context-freeness of Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 333–343.Google Scholar
  42. Stowell, T.: 1981,Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  43. Travis, L.: 1984,Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  44. Travis, L.: 1989, ‘Parameters of Phrase Structure’, in M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds.),Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  45. Uszkoreit, H.: 1986, ‘Constraints on Order’, Report No. CSLI-86-46, Stanford University, Standford, California.Google Scholar
  46. Webelhuth, G.: 1989,Syntactic Saturation Phenomena and the Modern Germanic Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  47. Wexler, K. and M. R. Manzini: 1987, ‘Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory’, in T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.),Parameter Setting, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, E.: 1981, ‘Language Acquisition, Markedness, and Phrase Structure’, in S. Tavakolian (ed.),Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  49. Zwicky, A. M. and J. A. Nevis: 1986, ‘Immediate Precedence in GPSG’, InInterfaces: Papers by Arnold M. Zwicky, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 32, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet Dean Fodor
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephen Crain
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Linguistics DepartmentGraduate Center, CUNYNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of LinguisticsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations