Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 295–338 | Cite as

The “no crossing constraint” in autosegmental phonology

  • John Coleman
  • John Local
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Autosegmental Phonology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archangeli, D.: 1985, ‘Yokuts Harmony: Evidence for Coplanar Representation in Nonlinear Phonology’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 335–372.Google Scholar
  2. Bird, S. and E. Klein: 1990, ‘Phonological Events’,Journal of Linguistics 26, 33–56.Google Scholar
  3. Broe, M.: 1988, ‘A Unification-Based Approach to Prosodic Analysis’, in G. Docherty, J. Miller and L. Stirling (eds.),Work in Progress 21, Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
  4. Browman, C. P. and L. M. Goldstein: 1986, ‘Towards an Articulatory Phonology’,Phonology Yearbook 3, 219–252.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N.: 1963, ‘Formal Properties of Grammars’, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and E. Galanter (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology Volume II. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Clements, G. N.: 1985, ‘The Geometry of Phonological Features’,Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–252.Google Scholar
  7. Clements, G. N.: 1986, ‘Compensatory Lengthening and Consonant Gemination in LuGanda’, in Wetzels and Sezer (eds).Google Scholar
  8. Clements, G. N. and S. J. Keyser: 1983,CV Phonology: a Generative Theory of the Syllable, M.I.T. Press, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 9. Cambridge, Massachussetts.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J.: 1990, ‘Unification Phonology: Another look at “Synthesis-by-Rule”, in H. Karlgren (ed.),COLING-90. Papers presented to the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, International Committee on Computational Linguistics/Helsinki University, pp. 79–84.Google Scholar
  10. Culy, C.: 1985, ‘The Complexity of the Vocabulary of Bambara’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 345–351.Google Scholar
  11. Dogil, G.: 1984, ‘Nonlinear Phonology in the Area of Speech and Grammar Pathology’, in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.),Advances in Nonlinear Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 161–178.Google Scholar
  12. Foley, J.: 1977,Foundations of Theoretical Phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbons, A.: 1985,Algorithmic Graph Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Goldsmith, J. A.: 1976,Autosegmental Phonology, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  15. Goldsmith, J. A.: 1985, ‘Vowel Harmony in Khalkha Mongolian, Yaka, Finnish and Hungarian’,Phonology Yearbook 2, 253–275.Google Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, J. A.: 1990,Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology', Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Halle, M.: 1985, ‘Speculations about the Representation of Words in Memory’, in V. A. Fromkin (ed.),Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Halle, M. and J.-R. Vergnaud: 1980, ‘Three Dimensional Phonology’,Journal of Linguistic Research 1(1), 83–105.Google Scholar
  19. Halle, M. and J.-R. Vergnaud: 1987: ‘Stress and the Cycle’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 45–84.Google Scholar
  20. Hammond, M.: 1988, On Deriving the ‘Well-Formedness Condition’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 319–325.Google Scholar
  21. Hayes, B.: 1989, ‘Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253–306.Google Scholar
  22. Hoberman, R. D.: 1988, ‘Local and Long-Distance Spreading in Semitic Morphology’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 541–549.Google Scholar
  23. Huybregts, R.: 1984, ‘The Weak Inadequacy of Context-Free Phrase Structure Grammars’, in G. de Haan, M. Trommelen, and W. Zonneveld (eds.),Van Periferie naar Kern, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  24. International Phonetic Association 1989, Report on the 1989 Kiel Convention,Journal of the International Phonetic Association 19, 67–80.Google Scholar
  25. Kay, M.: 1987, ‘Nonconcatenative Finite-State Morphology’, in Proceedings of the. 3rd European Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2–10.Google Scholar
  26. Kaye, J. D.: 1985, ‘On the Syllable Structure of Certain West African Languages’, in D. L. Goyvaerts (ed.),African Linguistics: Essays in Memory of M. W. K. Semikenke, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  27. Kelly, J. and J. K. Local: 1986, ‘Long-Domain Resonance Patterns in English’, inInternational Conference on Speech Input/Output Techniques and Applications, IEE Conference Publication No. 258.Google Scholar
  28. Kelly, J. and J. K. Local: 1989,Doing Phonology, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  29. Kitagawa, Y.: 1987, ‘Redoing Reduplication: A Preliminary Sketch’, in G. J. Huck and A. E. Ojeda (eds.),Discontinuous Constituency, Syntax and Semantics vol. 20, pp. 71–106.Google Scholar
  30. Kuratowski, G.: 1930, ‘Sur le Problème des Courbes Gauches en Topologie’,Fundamenta Mathematicæ 15, 271–83.Google Scholar
  31. Local, J. K.: 1989, ‘Modelling Assimilation in Non-Segmental Rule-Free Synthesis’, to appear in R. Ladd and G. Docherty (eds.),Papers from the Second Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Lord, E. A. and C. B. Wilson: 1984,The Mathematical Description of Shape and Form, Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
  33. Lowenstamm, J. and J. Kaye: 1986, ‘Compensatory Lengthening in Tiberian Hebrew’, in Wetzels and Sezer (eds.).Google Scholar
  34. Manaster-Ramer, A.: 1983, ‘The Soft Formal Underbelly of Theoretical Syntax’,C.L.S. 19, 256–263.Google Scholar
  35. McCarthy, J. J.: 1979/1982,Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  36. McCarthy, J. J.: 1981, ‘A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373–418.Google Scholar
  37. McCarthy, J. J.: 1986, ‘OCP Effects: Gemination and Antigemination’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207–263.Google Scholar
  38. McCarthy, J. J.: 1989, ‘Linear Order in Phonological Representation’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 71–99.Google Scholar
  39. McCarthy, J. J. and A. S. Prince: 1990, ‘Foot and Word in Prosodic Morphology: The Arabic Broken Plural’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 209–283.Google Scholar
  40. Prince, A. S.: 1984, ‘Phonology with Tiers’, in M. Aronoff and R. Oehrle (eds.),Language Sound Structure, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.Google Scholar
  41. Prince, A. S.: 1987, ‘Planes and Copying’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 491–509.Google Scholar
  42. Pulleyblank, D.: 1986,Tone in Lexical Phonology, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  43. Pulleyblank, D.: 1988, ‘Vocalic Underspecification in Yoruba’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 233–270.Google Scholar
  44. Pullum, G. and Gazdar, G.: 1982, ‘Natural Languages and Context Free Languages’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 471–504.Google Scholar
  45. Rosen, B. K.: 1977, ‘Arcs in Graphs are NOT Pairs of Nodes’,SIGACT News. Fall 1977, 25–27.Google Scholar
  46. Sagey, E.: 1988, ‘On the Ill-formedness of Crossing Association Lines’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 109–118.Google Scholar
  47. Scobbie, J.: 1988, ‘Minimal Redundancy in the Sequencing of Autosegments’, in G. Docherty, J. Miller and L. Stirling (eds.)Work in Progress 21. Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
  48. Shieber, S.: 1985, ‘Evidence Against the Context-Freeness of Natural Languages’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 333–343.Google Scholar
  49. van der Hulst, H. and N. Smith: 1982, Introduction to H. van der Hulst and N. Smith, (eds.),The Structure of Phonological Representations vol. I. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  50. Wetzels, L.: 1986, ‘Phonological Timing in Ancient Greek’, in Wetzels and Sezer (eds.).Google Scholar
  51. Wetzels, L. and E. Sezer (eds.), 1986,Studies in Compensatory Lengthening, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, R. J.: 1985,Introduction to Graph Theory, Longman, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Coleman
    • 1
  • John Local
    • 1
  1. 1.Experimental Phonetics Laboratory Department of Language and Linguistic ScienceUniversity of YorkEngland

Personalised recommendations