Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 39–94 | Cite as

Aspectual classes and aspectual composition

  • H. J. Verkuyl


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aristotle: 1984, ‘Metaphysics’, in:The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation II, 1552–1728, Princeton.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, E.: 1979, ‘On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics’, in: R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Academic Press, New York, pp. 62–81.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, E.: 1986, ‘The Algebra of Events’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.Google Scholar
  4. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’.Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, M. and B. Partee: 1978, ‘Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English’. IULC, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  6. Benthem, J. F. A. K. van: 1983,The Logic of Time. A Modeltheoretic Investigation into the Varieties of Temporal Ontology and Temporal Discourse, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Brecht, R. D.: 1981, ‘The Form and Function of Aspect in Russian’, in: M. S. Flier and R. D. Brecht (eds.),Russian Morphosyntax, Slavica Publishers, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, L.: 1981, ‘Aspect and Quantification’, in: Tedeschi and Zaenen, pp. 31–64.Google Scholar
  9. Comrie, B.: 1976,Aspect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, O.: 1981, ‘On the Definition of the Telic-Atelic (Bounded-Non-bounded) Distinction’, in: Tedeschi and Zaenen, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
  11. Dowty, D. R.: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Dowty, D. R.: 1986, ‘The Effects of Aspectual Class on the Temporal Structure of Discourse: Semantics or Pragmatics?’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 37–61.Google Scholar
  13. Dovvty, D. R.: (in preparation), ‘Aspect and Aktionsart’.Google Scholar
  14. Forsyth, J.: 1970,A Grammar of Aspect; Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Galton, A.: 1984,The Logic of Aspect; An Axiomatic Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Gruber, J. S.: 1976,Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Hoeksema, J.: 1984,Categorial Morphology, Diss. RUG.Google Scholar
  18. Jackendoff, R. S.: 1976, ‘Toward an Explanatory Semantic Representation’,Linguistic Inquiry 7, 89–150.Google Scholar
  19. Jackendoff, R. S.: 1983,Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  20. Jacobs, J.: 1982,Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen, Fink Verlag, München.Google Scholar
  21. Jacobsohn, H.: 1933, ‘Aspektfragen’,Indogermanische Forschungen 51, 292–318.Google Scholar
  22. Jong, F. M. G. de and H. J. Verkuyl: 1985, ‘Generalized Quantifiers: the Properness of their Strength’, in: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.),Generalized Quantifiers: Theory and Applications, GRASS 4, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
  23. Kamp, H.: 1979, ‘Events, Instants, and Temporal Reference’, in: R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin etc., pp. 376–416.Google Scholar
  24. Kamp, H.; 1980, ‘Some remarks on the Logic of Change, Part I’, in: Ch. Rohrer (ed.),Time, tense and Quantifiers, Max Niemeyer verlag, Tübingen 1980, pp. 135–179.Google Scholar
  25. Keenan, E. I. and J. Stavi: 1986, ‘A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326.Google Scholar
  26. Kenny, A.: 1963,Action, Emotion and Will, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London/New York.Google Scholar
  27. Leech, G. N.: 1969,Towards a Semantic Description of English, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  28. Meulen, Alice ter: 1983, ‘The Representation of Time in Natural Language’, in Alice ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, GRASS 1. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 177–191.Google Scholar
  29. Meulen, Alice ter: 1984, ‘Events, Quantities and Individuals’, in: F. Landman and F. Veltrnan (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 259–279.Google Scholar
  30. Mourelatos, A. P. D.: 1981, ‘Events, Processes and States’, in Tedeschi and Zaenen, pp. 191–211.Google Scholar
  31. Parsons, T.: 1985, ‘The Progressive in English: Events, States and Processes’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  32. Partee, B. H.: 1980, ‘Montague Grammar, Mental Representation and Reality’ in S. Kanger and S. Öhman (eds.),Philosophy and Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
  33. Platzaek, C.: 1979,The Semantic Interpretation of Aspect and Aktionsarten. A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  34. Poutsma, H.: 1926,A Grammar of Late Modern English II; The Parts of Speech II, ‘The Verb and its Particles’, Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar
  35. Putnam, H.: 1978,Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  36. Ryle, G.: 1949,The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Streitberg, W.: 1889,Perfective und imperfective Actionsart im Germanischen I, Halle a.S., Boston.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, B.: 1977, ‘Tense and Continuity’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 199–220.Google Scholar
  39. Tedeschi, P. J. and A. Zaenen, (eds.): 1981,Syntax and Semantics 14; Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Tichy, P.: 1980, ‘The Semantics of Episodic Verbs’,Theoretical Linguistics 7, 262–296.Google Scholar
  41. Timberlake, A.: 1982, ‘Invariance and the Syntax of Russian Aspect’, in P. J. Hopper (ed.),Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics & Pragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterman/Philadelphia, pp. 305–331.Google Scholar
  42. Togeby, O.: 1980, ‘Negation and Aspect’, in E. Hovdahaugen (ed.),The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, Oslo, pp. 64–80.Google Scholar
  43. Vendler, Z.: 1967,Linguistics in Philosophy, Comell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Verkuyl, H. J.: 1972,On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  45. Verkuyl, H. J.: 1976, ‘Interpretive Rules and the Description of the Aspects’,Foundations of Language 14, 471–503.Google Scholar
  46. Verkuyl, H. J.: 1978, ‘Thematic Relations and the Semantic Representation of Verbs Expressing Change’,Studies in Language 2, 199–233.Google Scholar
  47. Verkuyl, H. J.: 1985, ‘Temporal Insulation: On the Construction of Events’,Dutch Crossing 27, 22–45.Google Scholar
  48. Verkuyl, H. J.: 1987a, ‘Nondurative Closure of Events’, in J. A. G. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. J. B. Stokhof (eds.),Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
  49. Verkuyl, H. J.: 1988, ‘Aspectual Asymmetry and Quantification’, in V. Ehrich and H. Vater (eds.),Temporalsemantik. Beiträge zuer Linguistik der Zeitreferenz, (Proceedings of the Heidelberg workshop on Tense and Aspect 1986). De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 220–259.Google Scholar
  50. Verkuyl, H. J.: 1987b, ‘Aspect, Quantification and Negation’, inProceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 1987, ITLI-publication, pp. 353–372.Google Scholar
  51. Vlach, F.: 1981, ‘The Semantics of the Progressive’, in Tedeschi and Zaenen (eds.), pp. 271–292.Google Scholar
  52. Zwarts, F.: 1981, ‘Negatief Polaire Uitdrukkingen’,Glot 4, 35–132.Google Scholar
  53. Zwarts, F.: 1983, ‘Determiners: A Relational Perspective’, in A. G. B. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, GRASS 1, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 37–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Verkuyl
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtrechtJK UtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations