Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 1–14

On the identification of properties and propositional functions

  • George Bealer
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aczel, P.: 1980, ‘Frege Structures and the Notions of Propositions, Truth and Set’, in J. Keisler, J. Barwise and K. Kunen (eds.),The Kleene Symposium, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
  2. Aczel, P.: 1989, ‘Algebraic Semantics for Intensional Logics, I’, forthcoming in Chierchia, Partee, and Turner.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. A.: 1980, ‘Some New Axioms for the Logic of Sense and Denotation: Alternative (0)’,Noûs 14, 217–34.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. A.: 1986, ‘Intensional Logic’, Lecture at the American Philosophical Association Central Division Meeting, May 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Bealer, G.: 1979, ‘Theories of Properties, Relations, and Propositions’,Journal of Philosophy 76, 638–48.Google Scholar
  6. Bealer, G.: 1982,Quality and Concept, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Bealer, G.: 1983, ‘Completeness in the Theory of Properties, Relations, and Propositions’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 48, 415–26.Google Scholar
  8. Bealer, G.: 1986, ‘The Logical Status of Mind’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10, 231–74.Google Scholar
  9. Bealer, G. and U. Mönnich: 1989, ‘Property Theories’,Handbook for Philosophical Logic 4, F. Guenthner and D. Gabbay (eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht, 133–251.Google Scholar
  10. Chierchia, G. and R. Turner: 1988, ‘Semantics and Property Theory’,Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 261–302.Google Scholar
  11. Chierchia, G., B. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.): 1989,Properties, Types and Meaning, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Church, A.: 1951, ‘A Formulation of The Logic of Sense and Denotation’, in P. Henle, H. M. Kallen, and S. K. Langer (eds.),Structure, Method, and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Henry M. Scheffer, New York, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  13. Church, A.: 1954, ‘Intensional Isomorphism and the Identity of Belief’,Philosophical Studies 5, 65–73.Google Scholar
  14. Church, A.: 1973, 1974, ‘Outline of a Revised Formulation of The Logic of Sense and Denotation’, in two parts,Noûs 7, 24–33, and8, 135–56.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D.: 1983, ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 343–77.Google Scholar
  16. Mönnich, U.: 1983, ‘Toward a Calculus of Concepts as a Semantical Metalanguage’, in Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  17. Turner, R.: 1989, ‘Two Issues in the Foundations of Semantic Theory’, forthcoming in Chierchia, Partee, and Turner.Google Scholar
  18. Zalta, E. N.: 1980,An Introduction to a Theory of Abstract Objects, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Bealer
    • 1
  1. 1.Reed CollegePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations