It is well to remember that the issue of the use of animals in medical research and training is fought with highly emotional appeals. One needs to assess clearly the moral status of animals and the benefits that medical science produces. It is not enough and will not resolve the issues, to show pictures of animals going through a research procedure or to endlessly parade individuals who have been ‘saved’ by animal research. Only a clear understanding of the issues and careful reasoning will help resolve problems posed by the use of animals in medical research and education. The articles in this issue ofTheoretical Medicine advance the understanding of the moral problems with using animals in medical education, the role of IACUC's in resolving their problems, and the problems of assessing scientific and educational merit of animal use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Rollin BE.Animal Rights and Human Morality. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1981.
National Institute of Health.Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Bethesda: National Institute of Health, Sept, 1986. (Public Health Service (PHS)).
Regan T. An examination and defense of one argument concerning animal rights.Inquiry 1979;22 (Summer): 189–219.
Frey RG.Interests and Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
Moseley R.Animal Rights: An Analysis of the Major Arguments for Animal Rights. [Dissertation]. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University, 1984.
Singer P.Animal Liberation. New York: New York Review Book, 1975.
About this article
Cite this article
Moseley, R. Ethical problems with the use of animals in medical research and education: An introduction. Theor Med Bioeth 10, 1–7 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00625754