Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 165, Issue 2, pp 165–177 | Cite as

Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern

  • Jasmine Stabel
  • Gernot Wendler
  • Hans Scharstein
Article

Summary

Calling song with a carrier frequency of 5 kHz evokes positive phonotaxis in female crickets,Gryllus bimaculatus, when presented at an azimuth. In contrast, a continuous tone of 4.7 kHz in the same position when paired with calling song from above leads to negative phonotaxis. Under open-loop conditions, when a tethered animal runs on a paired tread wheel, characteristic curves are produced with the stable equilibrium point towards or away from the stimulus, respectively (Fig. 3).

In order to understand this sign reversal at the neuronal level, directional characteristics of the ascending acoustic inter neurons AN1 and AN2 were measured using extracellular recordings from the cervical connectives.

Taking the mean spike rate of the interneurons as a measure for their excitation, the function relating response magnitude to stimulus direction for calling song corresponds well to the behavioural characteristic curve (Fig. 5). The response function obtained using a continuous tone with simultaneous presentation of calling song from above is similar (Fig. 5) and hence does not correspond to the inverse behavioural characteristic curve.

However, consideration of the extent to which the temporal parameters of the calling song (syllables and chirps) are reflected in the neuronal response (amplitudes of the Fourier components) leads to characteristic curves for AN1 and AN2 which are in good agreement with the behaviour for stimulation with calling song as well as for the continuous tone experiment (Fig. 8). In addition, the neural response curves correspond to the behaviour in showing smaller amplitudes when a continuous tone rather than the calling song is presented on the horizon (Fig. 8).

From these data we conclude that the activity in interneurons AN1 and AN2 does not directly guide orientation in mating behaviour but first is filtered by a mechanism tuned to the frequency of syllables and/or chirps. According to this hypothesis recognition of conspecific song and localization proceed sequentially inGryllus.

Keywords

Spike Rate Stable Equilibrium Point Calling Song Syllable Frequency Chirp Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyan GS (1979) Directional responses to sound in the central nervous system of the cricketTeleogryllus commodus. I. Ascending interneurons. J Comp Physiol 130:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyan GS, Williams JLD (1982) Auditory neurons in the brain of the cricketGryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): ascending interneurons. J Insect Physiol 28:493–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd P, Lewis B (1983) Peripheral auditory directionality in the cricket (Gryllus campestris L.,Teleogryllus oceaniens Le Guillou). J Comp Physiol 153:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heiversen D von (1984) Parallel processing in auditory pattern recognition and directional analysis by the grasshopperChorthippus biguttulus L. (Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A 154:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hill KG, Boyan GS (1976) Directional hearing in crickets. Nature 262:390–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill KG, Boyan GS (1977) Sensitivity to frequency and direction of sound in the auditory system of crickets (Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 121:79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huber F, Kleindienst HU, Weber T, Thorson J (1984) Auditory behavior of the cricket. III Tracking of male calling song by surgically and developmentally one-eared females and the curious role of the anterior tympanum. J Comp Physiol A 155:725–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kramer E (1976) The orientation of walking honeybees in odour fields with small concentration gradient. Physiol Entomol 1:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moiseff A, Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1978) Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: mate attraction and predator avoidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4052–4056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nolen TG, Hoy RR (1986) Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors. J Comp Physiol A 158:423–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oldfield BP (1980) Accuracy of orientation in female crickets,Teleogryllus oceaniens (Gryllidae): dependence on song spectrum. J Comp Physiol 141:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pollack GS (1986) Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket,Teleogryllus oceanieus: the influence of sound direction on neuronal encoding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behavior. J Comp Physiol A 158:549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pollack GS, Plourde N (1982) Directionality of acoustic orientation in flying crickets. J Comp Physiol 146:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pollack GS, Huber F, Weber T (1984) Frequency and temporal pattern-dependent phonotaxis of cricket (Teleogryllus oceanieus) during tethered flight and compensated walking. J Comp Physiol A 154:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Popov AB, Shuvalov VF, Marcovich AM (1975) The spectrum of the calling signals, phonotaxis, and the auditory system in the cricketGryllus bimaculatus. J Evol Biochem Physiol 2:398–404Google Scholar
  16. Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory interneurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155:171–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schildberger K (1985) Recognition of temporal patterns by identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 41–49Google Scholar
  18. Schildberger K (1987) Acoustic communication in crickets: Behavioral and neuronal mechanisms of sound recognition and localization. In: Ali MA (ed) Invertebrate nervous systems. NATO Ali Series A, Plenum Press, pp 603–620Google Scholar
  19. Schmilz B, Scharstein H, Wendler G (1982) Phonotaxis inGryllus campestris L. (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). I. Mechanism of acoustic orientation in intact female crickets. J Comp Physiol 148:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stabel J, Wendler G, Scharstein H (1985) The escape reaction ofAcheta domesticus under open-loop conditions. In: Gewecke M, Wendler G (eds) Insect locomotion. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 79–85Google Scholar
  21. Thorson J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behaviour of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition inGryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol 146:361–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weber W, Thorson J (1988) Auditory behavior of the cricket. IV. Interaction of direction of tracking with perceived temporal pattern in split-song paradigms. J Comp Physiol A 163:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wendler G (1989) Acoustic orientation of crickets in the presence of two sound sources. Naturwissenschaften 76:128–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wendler G, Scharstein H (1986) The orientation of grain weevils (Sitophilus granarius): influence of spontaneous turning tendencies and of gravitational stimuli. J Comp Physiol A 159:377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wendler G, Heinzel H-G, Scharstein H (1984) Paired tread wheels as a tool for the analysis of orientation behaviour in arthropods. In: Varjú D, Schnitzler HU (eds) Localization and orientation in biology and engineering. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 170–172Google Scholar
  26. Wiese K, Eilts-Grimm K (1985) Functional potential of recurrent lateral inhibition in cricket audition. In: Kalmring K, Eisner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  27. Wohlers DW, Huber F (1982) Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricketGryllus campestris L. J Comp Physiol 146:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wohlers DW, Huber F (1985) Topographical organization of the auditory pathway within the prothoracic ganglion of the cricketGryllus campestris. Cell Tissue Res 239:556–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jasmine Stabel
    • 1
  • Gernot Wendler
    • 1
  • Hans Scharstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoologisches Institut der Universität KölnKöln 41Germany

Personalised recommendations