Advertisement

Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 131, Issue 2, pp 137–145 | Cite as

Comparative auditory neurophysiology of the inferior colliculus of two molossid bats,molossus ater andmolossus molossus

I. Gross evoked potentials and single unit responses to pure tones
  • M. Vater
  • P. Schlegel
  • H. Zöller
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Recordings were made from single inferior colliculus neurons of two closely related bat species,Molossus ater andMolossus molossus, both emitting short CF-FM echolocation calls which differ only in frequency range. Employing pure tone stimuli, minimum thresholds, tuning curves, response patterns and spike count functions were measured and compared between the two species.

     
  2. 2.

    The audiograms (evoked potential measurements and distribution of single neuron thresholds) of both species are rather broadly tuned, but maximum auditory sensitivity is reached at different frequency ranges according to the different spectral content of the orientation calls.

     
  3. 3.

    Single unit data concerning tuning curves, Q10dB-values, response patterns and spike count functions are very similar in the samples obtained from the two molossid species and closely resemble data from bats using FM-orientation calls.

     
  4. 4.

    The inferior colliculus of molossids is tonotopically organized. Asymmetrical and symmetrical tuning curves were found. Q10dB-values rarely exceeded 20, and so are values known as characteristic for other mammals. The dominant response pattern class is the “phasic-on” type with no or low spontaneous activity. Spike count functions of the non-monotonic type prevail.

     
  5. 5.

    Data are compared with results from “long CF-FM-bats”, revealing striking species differences in frequency selectivity of single neurons and organization of the ascending auditory pathway. This suggests different strategies in information processing which are discussed as adaptations to the species specific orientation calls.

     

Keywords

Response Pattern Single Neuron Inferior Colliculus Tuning Curve Tone Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

BF

best frequency

CF

constant frequency

EP

evoked potential

FM

frequency modulated

IC

inferior colliculus

SPL

sound pressure level re. 0.00002 N · m−2

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitkin, L.M.: Tonotopic organization at higher levels of the auditory pathway. Int. Rev. Physiol. Neurophysiol. II,10. Porter, R. (ed.), pp. 249–279 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Aitkin, L.M., Webster, W.R., Veale, J.L., Crosby, D.C.: Inferior colliculus. I. Comparison of response properties of neurons in central, pericentral, and external nuclei of adult cat. J. Neurophysiol.38, 1196–1206 (1975)Google Scholar
  3. Bruns, V.: Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM-bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. I. Mechanical specializations of the cochlea. J. Comp. Physiol.106, 77–86 (1976 a)Google Scholar
  4. Bruns, V.: Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM-bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. II. Frequency mapping of the cochlea. J. Comp. Physiol.106, 87–97 (1976b)Google Scholar
  5. Fitzpatrick, K.A.: Cellular architecture and topographic organization of the inferior colliculus of the squirrel monkey. J. Comp. Neurol.164, 185–208 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. Glaser, W.: Zur Hypothese des Optimalempfangs bei der Fledermausortung. J. Comp. Physiol.94, 227–248 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. Grinnell, A.D.: The neurophysiology of audition in bats: Intensity and frequency parameters. J. Physiol. (Lond.)167, 38–66 (1963)Google Scholar
  8. Grinnell, A.D.: Comparative auditory physiology of neotropical bats employing different echolocation signals. Z. vergl. Physiol.68, 117–153 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. Grinnell, A.D.: Neural processing mechanisms in echolocating bats, correlated with differences in emitted sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.54, 147–156 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Grinnell, A.D., Hagiwara, S.: Adaptations of the auditory nervous system for echolocation, studies of New Guinea bats. Z. vergl. Physiol.76, 41–81 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. Möller, J.: Die Funktion von Hemmeinflüssen bei Neuronen der lemniscalen Hörbahn bei der Echoortung vonRhinolophus ferrumequinum. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart (1977)Google Scholar
  12. Möller, J., Neuweiler, G., Zöller, H.: Response characteristics of the awake CF-FM-bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. 1. Single tone stimulation. J. Comp. Physiol.125, 217–225 (1978)Google Scholar
  13. Neuweiler, G.: Neurophysiologische Untersuchungen am Echoortungssystem der großen Hufeinsennase,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum Schreber, 1774. Z. vergl. Physiol.67, 273–306 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. Neuweiler, G.: Recognition mechanisms in echolocation of bats. In: Recognition of complex acoustic signals. Bullock, T.H. (ed.), pp. 111–126. Berlin: Dahlem Konferenzen 1977Google Scholar
  15. Neuweiler, G., Vater, M.: Response patterns to pure tone of cochlear nucleus units in the CF-FM-bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J. Comp. Physiol.115, 119–133 (1977)Google Scholar
  16. Pfeiffer, R.R.: Classification of response patterns of spike discharge for units in the cochlear nucleus: Tone burst stimulation. Exp. Brain Res.1, 219–235 (1966)Google Scholar
  17. Pollak, G.D., Marsh, D.S., Bodenhamer, R., Souther, A.: Characteristics of phasic-on neurons in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized bats with observations relating to mechanisms for echoranging. J. Neurophysiol.40, 926–942 (1977a)Google Scholar
  18. Pollak, G.D., Bodenhamer, R., Marsh, D.S., Souther, A.: Recovery cycles of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of unanaesthetized bats obtained with frequency-modulated and constant-frequency sounds. J. Comp. Physiol.120, 215–250 (1977b)Google Scholar
  19. Pollak, G.D., Marsh, D.S., Bodenhamer, R., Souther, A.: A single unit analysis of the inferior colliculus in unanaesthetized bats: Response patterns and spike count functions generated by constant-frequency and frequency-modulated sounds. J. Neurophysiol.41, 677–692 (1978)Google Scholar
  20. Rose, J.E., Greenwood, D.D., Goldberg, J.M., Hind, J.E.: Some discharge characteristics of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat. Tonotopic organization, relation of spike counts to tone intensity, and firing patterns of single elements. J. Neurophysiol.26, 294–320 (1963)Google Scholar
  21. Schnitzler, H.-U.: Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisenfledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Ortungssituationen. Z. vergl. Physiol.57, 376–408 (1968)Google Scholar
  22. Schnitzler, H.-U.: Die Echoortung der Fledermäuse und ihre hörphysiologischen Grundlagen. Fortschr. Zool.21, 136–189 (1973)Google Scholar
  23. Schuller, G., Beuter, K., Schnitzler, H.-U.: Response to frequency shifted artificial echoes in the batRhinolophus ferrumequinum. J. Comp. Physiol.89, 275–286 (1974)Google Scholar
  24. Simmons, J.A., Howell, D.J., Suga, N.: Information content of bat sonar echoes. Am. Sci.63, 204–215 (1975)Google Scholar
  25. Suga, N.: Single unit activity in cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus of echolocating bats. J. Physiol. (Lond.)172, 449–474 (1964a)Google Scholar
  26. Suga, N.: Recovery cycles and responses to frequency-modulated tone pulses in auditory neurons of echo-locating bats. J. Physiol. (Lond.)175, 50–80 (1964b)Google Scholar
  27. Suga, N.: Classification of inferior colliculus neurons of bats in terms of responses to pure tones, frequency-modulated sounds, and noise bursts. J. Physiol. (Lond.)200, 555–574 (1969)Google Scholar
  28. Suga, N.: Echoranging neurons in inferior colliculus of bats. Science170, 449–452 (1970)Google Scholar
  29. Suga, N.: Amplitude spectrum representation in the Dopplershifted-CF processing area of the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. Science196, 64–67 (1977)Google Scholar
  30. Suga, N., Schlegel, P.: Coding and processing in the auditory systems of FM-signal-producing bats. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.54, 174–190 (1973)Google Scholar
  31. Suga, N., Neuweiler, G., Möller, J.: Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis in the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. IV. Properties of peripheral auditory neurons. J. Comp. Physiol.106, 111–125 (1976)Google Scholar
  32. Vater, M., Schlegel, P.: Comparative auditory neurophysiology of the inferior colliculus of two molossid bats,Molossus ater andMolossus molossus. II. Single unit responses to frequency-modulated signals and signal and noise combinations. J. Comp. Physiol.131, 147–160 (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Vater
    • 1
  • P. Schlegel
    • 1
  • H. Zöller
    • 1
  1. 1.Arbeitskreis Neuro- und RezeptorphysiologieFachbereich Biologie der J.W. Goethe-UniversitätFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations