Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 323–333 | Cite as

The visual pigment sensitivity hypothesis: further evidence from fishes of varying habitats

  • Frederick Crescitelli
  • Margaret McFall-Ngai
  • Joseph Horwitz
Article

Summary

Visual pigments were extracted from the retinas of 8 species of marine teleosts and 4 species of elasmobranchs and a comparison was made of the pigment properties from these fishes, some inhabiting surface waters, others from the mesopelagic zone, and a few migrating vertically between these two environments. An association was found between the spectral position of the absorbance curve and the habitat depth or habitat behavior, with the blue-shifted chrysopsins being the pigments of the twilight zone fishes and the rhodopsins with fishes living near the surface. The retina of the swell shark (Cephaloscyllium ventriosum) yielded extracts with two photopigments; one, a rhodopsin at 498 nm; the second, a chrysopsin at 478 nm. This fish has been reported to practice seasonal vertical migrations between the surface and the mesopelagic waters. In addition to the spectral absorbance, several properties of these visual pigments were examined, including the meta-III product of photic bleaching, regeneration with added 11-cis and 9-cis retinals, and the chromophoric photosensitivity. The chrysopsin properties were found to be fundamentally similar to those of typical vertebrate rhodopsins. Correlating the spectral data with the habitat and habitat behavior of our fishes gives us confidence in the idea that the scotopic pigments have evolved as adaptations to those aspects of their color environment that are critical to the survival of the species.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayliss LE, Lythgoe RJ, Tansley K (1936) Some new forms of visual purple found in sea fishes with a note on the visual cells of origin. Proc R Soc Lond B 120:95–114Google Scholar
  2. Beebe W (1930) A quarter mile down in the open sea. NY Zool Bull 33:201–244Google Scholar
  3. Brauer A (1908) Die Tiefseefische. Wiss. Ergeb. der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer Valdivia 2 (Anatomischer Teil) 15:1–266Google Scholar
  4. Bridges CDB (1972) The rhodopsin-porphyropsin visual system. In: Dartnall HJA (ed) Photochemistry of vision. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/l). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 417–480Google Scholar
  5. Clarke GL (1936) On the depth at which fish can see. Ecology 17:452–456Google Scholar
  6. Crescitelli F (1958) The natural history of visual pigments. Ann NY Acad Sci 74:230–255Google Scholar
  7. Crescitelli F (1972) The visual cells and visual pigments of the vertebrate eye. In: Dartnall HJA (ed) Photochemistry of vision. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/1), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 245–363Google Scholar
  8. Crescitelli F (1985) Exp Eye Res 40:521–535Google Scholar
  9. Crescitelli F, Karvaly B (1983) The gecko visual pigment: Its photosensivity and the effects of chloride and nitrate ions. Proc R Soc Lond B 220:69–87Google Scholar
  10. Dartnall HJA (1957) The visual pigments. Methuen and Co. LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Dartnall HJA (1965) Discussion to Munz FW. Adaptation of visual pigments to the photic environment. Ciba Found Symp 47–48Google Scholar
  12. Dartnall HJA (1972a) Visual pigment of the coelacanth. Nature 239:341–342Google Scholar
  13. Dartnall HJA (1972b) Photosensitivity. In: Dartnall HJA (ed) Photochemistry of vision (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/l). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 122–145Google Scholar
  14. Denton EJ, Shaw TI (1963) The visual pigments of some deepsea elasmobranchs. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 43:65–70Google Scholar
  15. Denton EJ, Walker MA (1958) The visual pigment of the conger eel. Proc R Soc Lond B 148:257–269Google Scholar
  16. Denton EJ, Warren FJ (1956) Visual pigments of deep-sea fish. Nature 178:1059Google Scholar
  17. Denton EJ, Warren FJ (1957) The photosensitive pigments in the retinas of deep-sea fish. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 36:651–662Google Scholar
  18. Denton EJ, Gilpin-Brown JB, Wright PG (1972) The angular distribution of the light produced by some mesopelagic fish in relation to their camouflage. Proc R Soc Lond B 182:145–158Google Scholar
  19. DeWitt LA (1977) Notes on shark species in nearshore waters near Point Conception, California. Calif Fish Game 63:273Google Scholar
  20. Eschmeyer WN, Herald ES (1983) A field guide to Pacific Coast fishes of North America. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez HR (1978) Visual pigments of bioluminescent and nonbioluminescent deep-sea fishes. Vision Res 19:589–592Google Scholar
  22. Fitch JE, Lavenberg RJ (1968) Deep-water teleostean fishes of California. Calif Natural Hist Guides 25, Univ of Calif Press, Berkeley Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldsmith T (1972) The natural history of invertebrate visual pigments. In: Dartnall HJA (ed) Photochemistry of vision. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/l). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 685–719Google Scholar
  24. Hvass H (1965) Fishes of the world. Methuen & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Jerlov NG (1951) Optical studies of ocean water. Rep Swed Deep Sea Exped 3: Physics & chemistry, Fasc 1:1–59Google Scholar
  26. Kampa EM (1970a) Underwater daylight measurements in the Sea of Cortez. Deep-Sea Res 17:271–280Google Scholar
  27. Kampa EM (1970b) Underwater daylight and moonlight measurements in the eastern North Atlantic. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 50:397–420Google Scholar
  28. Knowles A, Dartnall HJA (1977) The photobiology of vision. London, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Locket NA (1977) Adaptations to the deep-sea environment. In: Crescitelli F (ed) The visual system of vertebrates. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/5). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 67–192Google Scholar
  30. Lythgoe JN (1968) Visual pigments and visual range underwater. Vision Res 8:997–1012Google Scholar
  31. Lythgoe JN (1979) The ecology of vision, Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. McFarland WN (1970) Visual pigment ofCallorhinchus callorynchius, a Southern hemisphere chimaeroid fish. Vision Res 10:939–1942Google Scholar
  33. McFarland WN (1971) Cetacean visual pigments. Vision Res 11:1065–1076Google Scholar
  34. Munk O (1966) Ocular anatomy of some deep-sea teleosts. Dana Rep 70:1–62Google Scholar
  35. Muntz WRA (1976) Visual pigments of cichlid fishes from Malawi. Vision Res 16:897–904Google Scholar
  36. Munz FW (1957) Photosensitive pigments from retinas of deepsea fishes. Science 125:1142–1143Google Scholar
  37. Munz FW (1958) Photosensitive pigments from the retinae of certain deep-sea fishes. J Physiol 140:220–235Google Scholar
  38. Munz FW (1965) Adaptation of visual pigments to the photic environment. Ciba Found Symp 27–45Google Scholar
  39. Munz FW, McFarland WN (1973) The significance of spectral position in the rhodopsins of tropical marine fishes. Vision Res 13:1829–1874Google Scholar
  40. O'Day WT, Fernandez HR (1974)Aristostomias scintillans (Malacosteidae): A deep-sea fish with visual pigments apparently adapted to its own bioluminescence. Vision Res 14:545–550Google Scholar
  41. Oster RH, Clarke GL (1935) The penetration of the red, green, and violet components of daylight into Atlantic waters. J Opt Soc Am 25:84–91Google Scholar
  42. Pepperberg DR, Brown PK, Lurie M, Dowling JE (1978) Visual pigment and photoreceptor sensitivity in the isolated skate retina. J Gen Physiol 71:369–396Google Scholar
  43. Stiles WS (1965) Discussion to Munz FW. Adaptation of visual pigments to the photic environment. Ciba Found Symp: 46–47Google Scholar
  44. Wald G, Brown PK, Brown PS (1957) Visual pigments and depths of habitat of marine fishes. Nature 180:969–971Google Scholar
  45. Walters V (1955) Fishes of Arctic America and Siberia. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 106:255–368Google Scholar
  46. Willis JM, Pearcy WG (1982) Vertical distribution and migration of fishes of the lower mesopelagic zone off Oregon. Mar Biol 70:87–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick Crescitelli
    • 1
  • Margaret McFall-Ngai
    • 2
  • Joseph Horwitz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Jules Stein Eye InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations