Spherical aberration of crystalline lens in the roach,Rutilus rutilus L.
- 29 Downloads
- 16 Citations
Summary
- 1.
The lowest optimal value of the relative focal length for paraxial rays (=f0/R, R= radius of crystalline lens) known in fish was found which equalled to 2.192 at 546 nm wave-length.
- 2.
The value of the radius of effective entrance area of crystalline lens, amounting to 0.910R, was the lowest of those obtained in fish, too.
- 3.
The longitudinal spherical aberration, expressed as the spherical aberration area,SLA, depends parabolically upon the relative focal length for paraxial rays.
- 4.
Similarly to pike and rainbow trout in which species the spherical aberration was studied recently, the distribution of data of the relative focal length for paraxial rays about their optimal value is asymmetric, and therefore the regression curve which represents a relationship betweenf0/R andSLA is only a halfparabola (Fig. 3).
- 5.
A comparison to pike and rainbow trout yields that, although the degree of spherical aberration removal in all the species seems to be nearly the same, the differences between various species are remarkable due to a role which is played by the irregularities of both the external shape of crystalline lens and the internal distribution of refractive indices of lenticular tissue. Hence it is assumed that the quality of a monochromatic image formed on the retina of roach is poorer than it might be expected in pike and rainbow trout.
- 6.
A continuing the investigations on spherical aberration of crystalline lens in fish promises good prospects for solving the problem of refractive index distribution and that of resolution angle.
Keywords
Refractive Index Retina Rainbow Trout Regression Curve Index DistributionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Charman, W.N., Tucker, J.: The optical system of the goldfish eye. Vision Res.13, 1–8 (1973)Google Scholar
- Fletcher, A., Murphy, T., Young, A.: Solutions of two optical problems. Proceed. Roy. Soc. LondonA223, 216–225 (1954)Google Scholar
- Matthiessen, L.: Über die Beziehungen, welche zwischen dem Brechungsindex des Kerncentrums der Krystallinse und den Dimensionen des Auges bestehen. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol.27, 510–523 (1882)Google Scholar
- Munk, O.: On the eyes of two foveate notosudid teleosts,Scopelosaurus hoedti andAbliesaurus berryi. Vidensk. Meddr. dansk naturh. Foren.138, 87–125 (1975)Google Scholar
- Prosser, C.L., Brown, F.A.: Comparative animal physiology. Philadelphia-London: W.B. Saunders Co. 1962Google Scholar
- Pumphrey, E.J.: Concerning vision. In: The cell and the organism. Essays presented to Sir James Gray, pp. 193–208. London-New York-Cambridge: University Press 1961Google Scholar
- Sadler, J.D.: The focal length of the fish eye and visual acuity. Vision Res.13, 417–423 (1973)Google Scholar
- Schwassmann, H.O.: Refractive state, accommodation, and resolving power of the fish eye. In: Vision in fishes. New approaches in research, pp. 279–288. New York-London: Plenum Press 1975Google Scholar
- Sivak, J.G.: The refractive error of the fish eye. Vision Res.14, 209–213 (1974)Google Scholar
- Sivak, J.G.: Accommodative mechanisms in aquatic vertebrates. In: Vision in fishes. New approaches in research, pp. 289–298. New York-London: Plenum Press 1975Google Scholar
- Sroczyński, S.: Die sphärische Aberration der Augenlinse der Regenbogenforelle (Salmo gairdneri Rich.). Zool. Jb. Physiol.79, 204–212 (1975a)Google Scholar
- Sroczyński, S.: Die sphärische Aberration der Augenlinse des Hechts (Esox lucius L.). Zool. Jb. Physiol.79, 547–558 (1975b)Google Scholar
- Sroczyński, S.: Untersuchungen über die Wachstumsgesetzmäßigkeiten des Sehorgans des Hechts (Esox lucius L.). Arch. Fisch Wiss.26, 137–150 (1976a)Google Scholar
- Sroczyński, S.: Die chromatische Aberration der Augenlinse der Regenbogenforelle (Salmo gairdneri Rich.). Zool. Jb. Physiol.80, 432–450 (1976b)Google Scholar
- Tamura, T.: A study of visual senses in fish, especially on resolving power and accommodation. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish.22, 136–157 (1957)Google Scholar