Abstract
According to A.A. Khentov Venus' rotation is in the quasi-stationary state as a result of the balance interaction of the solar tidal torque with the aerodynamical torque of the rotating Venus' atmosphere. In case of the nonconservative forces are negligible and the solar attraction is the stabilizing factor, the rotation of the rigid Venus may be assumed as the first approximation. The theory of the rotation of the rigid Venus in the coordinatesμ,ν,π had been constructed. It have been found that Venus rotates almost uniformly and the libration harmonics are negligible.
Key words
Venus' rotation librationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Barkin Yu. V.: 1987, ‘Periodical Solution of first Sort in the Three Bodies Problem and the Motion of Venus’,Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser.Astron. 297(2), 311–314 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Beletskij V. V.: 1975, ‘Satellite Motion Relative to the Mass Center’,Moscow Univ.Press, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Beletskij V. V., Levin E. M., Pogorelov D. Yu.: 1980, ‘On the Resonant Rotation of Venus’,Astron. Zhurnal 57, 158–167 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Beletskij V. V., Levin E. M., Pogorelov D. Yu.: 1981, ‘On the Resonant Rotation of Venus (II)’,Astron. Zhurnal 58, 198–207 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Burša M.: 1985, ‘On the Variation in the Venus' Rotation’,Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl. 36, 71–73.Google Scholar
- Deprit A.: 1969, ‘Canonical Transformations depending on a Small Parameters’,Celest. Mech. 1, 12–30.Google Scholar
- Goldreich P., Peale S.: 1968, ‘The Dynamics of Planetary Rotations’,Ann. Rev. Astron. and Astroph. 6, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
- IAU/IAG/COSPAR Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites: 1991.Google Scholar
- Khentov A. A.,: 1982, ‘Dynamics of Formation of the Resonance Rotations of Natural Celestial Bodies’,Astron. Zhurnal 59, 769–778 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Khentov A. A.,: 1986, ‘On Retrograde Resonant Rotations of Natural Celestial Bodies’,Astron. Zhurnal 63, 349–365 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Khentov A. A.,: 1989, ‘On the Problem of Interpretation of the Observed Rotation of Venus’,Astron. Zhurnal 66, 202–204 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Khentov A. A.,: 1992, ‘The Dynamics of the Rotation of Venus with an Account for the Superrotation of its Atmosphere’,Astron. Zhurnal 69, 365–659 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Kozlovskaya S. V.,: 1966, ‘Models of the Internal Structure of the Earth, Venus and Mars’,Astron. Zhurnal 43, 1081–1097 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Shen M. and Zhang: 1988, ‘The Dynamical Flattening of Mercury and Venus’,Earth, Moon and Planets 41, 289–294.Google Scholar
- Williams B. G. et al.: 1983,Icarus 56, 578–589.Google Scholar
- Zhang and Shen M.: 1987, ‘Tidal Variations in the Rotation of Venus’,Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl. 38, 325–328.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995