Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 147, Issue 4, pp 495–501 | Cite as

Orientation of comb building by honeybees

  • David De Jong
Article

Summary

Upon entering a new home site a honeybee swarm is faced with the task of organizing the building activities of thousands of component bees so that several straight and parallel vertically oriented combs can be quickly and efficiently built. As a part of this organization process it is necessary for the bees to select and agree upon a planar orientation for the new combs.

This paper presents evidence that memory of a previously used comb direction influences the building of the new set of combs. Swarms which have recently moved into bait-hives (empty boxes placed in trees to attract feral swarms) tend to maintain the previously used comb direction when removed and forced to build new combs, whereas swarms which have occupied the bait-hives for a longer period (over 9 days) do not.

Recent swarms predictably alter their comb building direction within the influence of an applied earthstrength magnetic field, indicating that honey bees are able to use the earth's magnetic field as a reference at the commencement of comb construction in a new hive.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batschelet E (1965) Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. American Institute of Biological Sciences Monograph, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Batschelet E (1972) Recent statistical methods for orientation data. In: Galler SR et al. (eds) Animal orientation and navigation. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, pp 61–91Google Scholar
  3. Crane E (1974) Directions in which bees build combs. Bee World 55:153–155Google Scholar
  4. Darwin C (1859) The origin of species by natural selection. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Emlen ST (1975) Migration: Orientation and navigation. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol V. Academic Press, New York, pp 129–219Google Scholar
  6. Emlen ST, Wiltschko W, Demong NJ, Wiltschko R, Bergman S (1976) Magnetic direction finding: evidence for its use in migratory Indigo Buntings. Science 193:505–508Google Scholar
  7. Fraser HM (1951) Beekeeping in antiquity. University of London Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Frisch K von, Frisch O von (1974) Animal architecture. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibson RJ (1969) A monograph on magnetic fields for life scientists. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Report A-B2299-3, vol IIGoogle Scholar
  10. Gould JL (1980) The case for magnetic sensitivity in birds and bees (such as it is). Am Sci 68:256–267Google Scholar
  11. Gould JL, Kirschvink JL, Deffeyes KS (1978) Bees have magnetic remanence. Science 201:1028Google Scholar
  12. Huber F (1814) Nouvelles observations sur les abeilles, I, II. Hamilton, Illinois (New observations on bees, I, IL Translated by C.P. Dadant 1926. Hamilton, Illinois)Google Scholar
  13. Ifantidis MD (1978) Wabenorientierung im Nest der Honigbiene (Apis mellifica L.) Apidologie 9:57–73Google Scholar
  14. Lindauer M (1973) Das Magnetfeld der Erde als Orientierungshilfe für die Bienen. Imkerfreund 28:3–7Google Scholar
  15. Lindauer M (1976) Recent advances in the orientation and learning of honeybees. Proc XV Int Congr Entomol, pp 450–460Google Scholar
  16. Lindauer M, Martin H (1972) Magnetic effect on dancing bees. Symposium NASA SP-262, Animal Orientation and Navigation. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 559–567Google Scholar
  17. Martin H, Lindauer M (1966) Sinnesphysiologische Leistungen beim Wabenbau der Honigbiene. Z Vergl Physiol 53:372–404Google Scholar
  18. Martin H, Lindauer M (1973) Orientierung im Erdmagnetfeld. Fortschr Zool 21:211–228Google Scholar
  19. Martin H, Lindauer M (1977) Der Einfluß des Erdemagnetfeldes auf die Schwereorientierung der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera). J Comp Physiol 122:145–187Google Scholar
  20. Rubens SM (1945) Cube surface coil for producing a uniform magnetic field. Rev Sci Instrum 16:243–245Google Scholar
  21. Seeley TD (1977) Measurement of nest cavity volume by the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:201–227Google Scholar
  22. Seeley TD (1978) Life history strategy of the honey beeApis mellifera. Oecologia (Berl) 32:109–118Google Scholar
  23. Seeley TD, Morse RA (1976) The nest of the honeybee. Insectes Soc 23:495–512Google Scholar
  24. Seeley TD, Morse RA (1978) Nest site selection by the honeybeeApis mellifera. Insectes Soc 25:323–337Google Scholar
  25. Wedmore EB (1948) The ventilation of beehives. Bee World 29:20Google Scholar
  26. Werner-Meyer W (1960) Wachs and Wachsbau-Kittharz. In: Budel A, Herold E (eds) Biene und Bienenzucht. Ehrenwirth, München, pp 202–232Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • David De Jong
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Depto. de GeneticaFaculdade de Medicina, USPRibeirão Preto, São PauloBrasil

Personalised recommendations