Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 160, Issue 5, pp 613–619 | Cite as

Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labor based on hormonall regulated response thresholds

  • Gene E. Robinson


Treatment of 1-day-old worker honey bees with the juvenile hormone analog methoprene prematurely reduced their behavioral threshold sensitivity to alarm pheromones. Electroantennogram assays indicated that peripheral perception was not affected; the effects apparently occurred in the central nervous system. These results support a model (Robinson 1987) of division of labor based on the hormonal regulation of response thresholds to task-associated stimuli. Coupled with other studies (Breed 1983; Robinson 1985), they also suggest that: 1) aggression in the honey bee is hormonally mediated and 2) a single hormone is involved in both the production and perception of an olfactory communication signal, the first report of this phenomenon in an invertebrate.



juvenile hormone


central nervous system




Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barth RH Jr (1969) Pheromone-endocrine interactions in insects. In: Benson GK, Phillips JG (eds) Hormones and the environment. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 373–404Google Scholar
  2. Bigley WS, Vinson SB (1979) Degradation of [14C] methoprene in the imported fire ant,Solenopsis invicta. Pestic Biochem Physiol 10:1–13Google Scholar
  3. Bjostad LB, Roelofs WL (1980) An inexpensive electronic device for measuring electroantennogram responses to sex pheromone components with a voltmeter. Physiol Entomol 5:309–314Google Scholar
  4. Boch R, Rothenbuhler WC (1974) Defensive behaviour and production of alarm pheromone in honey bees. J Apicult Res 13:217–221Google Scholar
  5. Boch R, Shearer DA, Stone BC (1962) Identification of isoamyl acetate as an active component in the sting pheromone of the honey bee. Nature 195:1018–1020Google Scholar
  6. Breed MD (1983) Correlations between aggressiveness and corpora allata volume, social isolation, age and dietary protein in worker honey bees. Insectes Soc 30:482–495Google Scholar
  7. Breed MD, Bell WJ (1983) Hormonal influences on invertebrate aggressive behavior. In: Savre BB (ed) Hormones and aggressive behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp 577–591Google Scholar
  8. Collins AM (1979) Genetics of the response of the honey bee to an alarm chemical, isopentyl acetate. J Apicult Res 18:285–291Google Scholar
  9. Collins AM (1980) Effect of age on the response to alarm pheromones by caged honeybees. Ann Entomol Soc Am 73:307–309Google Scholar
  10. Collins AM (1981) Effects of temperature and humidity on honeybee response to alarm pheromones. J Apicult Res 20:13–18Google Scholar
  11. Collins AM, Rothenbuhler WC (1978) Laboratory test of the response to an alarm chemical, isopentyl acetate, byApis mellifera. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71:906–909Google Scholar
  12. Collins AM, Rinderer TE, Tucker KW, Sylvester HA, Lackett JJ (1980) A model of honeybee defensive behaviour. J Apicult Res 19:224–231Google Scholar
  13. Collins AM, Rinderer TE, Harbo JR, Bolten AB (1982) Colony defense of Africanized and European honey bees. Science 218:224–231Google Scholar
  14. Copijn GM, Beetsma J, Wirtz P (1979) Queen differentiation and mortality after application of different juvenile hormone analogues to worker larvae of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Proc Kon Ned Akad Wet C 82:29–42Google Scholar
  15. Davis EE (1984) Regulation of sensitivity in the peripheral chemoreceptor systems for host-seeking behaviour by a haemolymph-borne factor inAedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol 30:179–183Google Scholar
  16. Fluri P, Lüscher M, Wille H, Gerig L (1982) Changes in weight of the pharyngeal gland and haemolymph titres of juvenile hormone, protein and vitellogenin in worker honey bees. J Insect Physiol 28:61–68Google Scholar
  17. Free JB (1965) The allocation of duties among worker honey bees. Zool Soc Lond Symp 14:39–59Google Scholar
  18. Free JB, Winder ME (1983) Brood recognition by honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers. Anim Behav 31:539–545Google Scholar
  19. Freund RJ, Littell RC (1981) SAS for linear models: A guide to the ANOVA and GLM procedures. SAS Institute, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoy RR, Hahn J, Paul RC (1977) Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science 195:82–84Google Scholar
  21. Hussein MH, Abdel-Aal YAI (1978) Effect of ZR-515 on honeybee,Apis mellifera. Z Angew Entomol 87:109–111Google Scholar
  22. Kandel ER, Krasne FB, Strumwasser F, Truman JT (1979) Cellular mechanisms in the selection and modulation of behavior. Neurosci Res Prog Bul 17:523–710Google Scholar
  23. Lee C, Ingersoll DW (1983) Pheromonal influence on aggressive behavior. In: Savre BB (ed) Hormones and aggressive behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp 373–393Google Scholar
  24. Maschwitz U (1964) Alarm substances and alarming processes for danger in social Hymenoptera. Z Vergl Physiol 47:596–655Google Scholar
  25. Masson C, Arnold G (1984) Ontogeny, maturation and plasticity of the olfactory system in the worker bee. J Insect Physiol 30:7–14Google Scholar
  26. Robinson GE (1985) Effects of a juvenile hormone analogue on honey bee foraging behaviour and alarm pheromone production. J Insect Physiol 35:277–282Google Scholar
  27. Robinson GE (1987) Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, In pressGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson GE, Strambi A, Strambi C, Paulino-Simões ZL, Tozeto SO, Barbosa JMN (1987) Juvenile hormone in European and Africanized honey bees. Gen Comp Endocrinol (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Roelofs WL (1984) Electroantennogram assays: rapid and convenient screening procedures for pheromones. In: Hummel HG, Miller TA (eds) Techniques in pheromone research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 131–161Google Scholar
  30. Röseler PF (1985) Endocrine basis of dominance and reproduction in polistine paper wasps. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Sinauer, Stuttgart, pp 259–273Google Scholar
  31. Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology: a study of adaptation in social life. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  32. Shearer DA, Boch R (1965) 2-heptanone in the mandibular gland secretion of the honeybee. Nature 206:530Google Scholar
  33. Southwick EE, Moritz RFA (1985) Metabolic response to alarm pheromone in honey bees. J Insect Physiol 31:389–392Google Scholar
  34. Staal GB (1975) Insect growth regulators with juvenile hormone activity. Annu Rev Entomol 20:417–460Google Scholar
  35. Stort AC (1975) Genetic study of aggressiveness of two subspecies ofApis mellifera in Brazil. II. Time at which the first sting reached the leather ball. J Apicult Res 14:171–175Google Scholar
  36. Stort AC (1976) Genetic study of aggressiveness of two subspecies ofApis mellifera in Brazil. III. Time taken for the colony to become aggressive. Ciên y Cult 28:1182–1185Google Scholar
  37. Szabo TI, Townsend GF (1974) Behavioural studies on queen introduction in the honeybee. 1. Effect of the age of workers (from a colony with a laying queen) on their behaviour towards an introduced virgin queen. J Apicult Res 13:19–25Google Scholar
  38. Tobe SS, Stay B (1979) Modulation of juvenile hormone synthesis by an analogue in the cockroach. Nature 281:481–482Google Scholar
  39. Truman JT (1978) Hormonal control of invertebrate behaviour. Horm and Behav 10:214–234Google Scholar
  40. Truman JT, Riddiford LM (1974) Hormonal mechanisms underlying insect behaviour. In: Treherne JE, Berridge MJ, Wigglesworth VB (eds) Advances in insect physiology, vol 10. Academic Press, New York, pp 297–352Google Scholar
  41. Visscher PK (1983) The honeybee way of death: necrophoric behaviour inApis mellifera colonies. Anim Behav 31:1070–1076Google Scholar
  42. Webster RP, Cardé RT (1984) The effects of mating, exogenous juvenile hormone and a juvenile hormone analogue on pheromone titre, calling and oviposition in the omnivorous leafroller moth (Platynota stultana). J Insect Physiol 30:113–118Google Scholar
  43. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson EO (1985) Between-caste aversion as a basis for division of labor in the antPheidole pubiventris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:35–37Google Scholar
  45. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press (in press)Google Scholar
  46. Zdárek J, Haragsim (1974) Action of juvenoids on metamorphosis of the honey-bee,Apis mellifera. J Insect Physiol 20:209–221Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gene E. Robinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations