Sensitivity to ultrasound in an identified auditory interneuron in the cricket: a possible neural link to phonotactic behavior
- 118 Downloads
In the cricket,Teleogryllus oceanicns, an identified auditory interneuron, interneuron-1 (int-1), is described morphologically and physiologically (Figs. 1,2). There is one such neuron in each hemiganglion of the prothoracic ganglion. The medial dendrites of int-1 overlap part of the terminal field formed by the auditory afferent axons from the ear and int-1's axon ascends to the brain, terminating on the same (ipsilateral) side (Fig- 2).
The neuron has a two-part frequency response characteristic: (1) its spontaneous activity is suppressed by low frequencies (3 to 8 kHz) at threshold-to-moderate intensities (Fig. 9 B), and (2) it is strongly excited at high frequencies, especially ultrasonic, from 15–100 kHz (Fig. 3).
Int-1 produces more spikes per tone pulse (Fig. 4) and its reponse latency decreases (Fig. 5), with increasing levels of intensity when stimulated by ultrasound.
Two-tone inhibition occurs in int-1. When a 30 kHz (normally excitatory) tone is combined with a 5 kHz tone (which suppresses spontaneous activity), the combination tone results in a diminished response, compared to the response to the excitatory tone alone (Fig. 6).
The excitation of int-1 shows lateralization. Excitation is stronger in the neuron ipsilateral to the sound source, than in the contralateral int-1 (Fig. 9).
Int-1 responds to electronically-generated pulse trains that simulate bat-echolocation signals. The neuron is responsive to a range of ultrasonic frequencies that are contained in the echolocation signals of insectivorous bats (Fig. 11).
In light of its response characteristics, we speculate that int-1 plays a role in the detection of ultrasonic signals emitted in the cricket's normal environment by hunting bats.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alexander RD (1967) Acoustical communication in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 12:495–526Google Scholar
- Boyan GS (1981) Two-tone suppression of an auditory neuron in the brain of the cricket: proposed role in phonotactic behavior. J Comp Physiol 144:117–126Google Scholar
- Boyan GS, Williams JLD (1982) Auditory neurons in the brain of the cricketGryllus bimaculatus (DeGeer): ascending interneurones. J Insect Physiol 28:493–502Google Scholar
- Casaday GB, Hoy RR (1977) Auditory interneurons in the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus: Physiological and anatomical properties. J Comp Physiol 121:1–13Google Scholar
- Eibl E, Huber F (1979) Central projections of tibial sensory fibers within the three thoracic ganglia of crickets. Zoomorphology 92:1–17Google Scholar
- Esch H, Huber F, Wohlers D (1980) Physiological and anatomical properties of sensory auditory fibers in crickets,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer,Gryllus campestris L. J Comp Physiol 137:27–38Google Scholar
- Elsner N, Popov AV (1978) Neuroethology of acoustic communication. Adv Insect Physiol 13:229–355Google Scholar
- Griffin DR (1974) Listening in the dark. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hill KG (1974) Carrier frequency as a factor in the phonotactic behavior of female crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). J Comp Physio 193:7–18Google Scholar
- Hill KG, Loftus-Hills JJ, Gartside DF (1972) Pre-mating isolation between the Australian field cricketsTeleogryllus commodus andT. oceaniens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust J Zoo 120:153–163Google Scholar
- Hoy RR (1978) Acoustic communication in crickets: a model system for the study of feature detection. Fed Proc 37:2316–2323Google Scholar
- Hoy RR, Casaday GC (1976) Physiological and anatomical properties of cricket auditory interneurons. Soc Neurosci Abstr 2:347Google Scholar
- Hoy RR, Paul RC (1973) Genetic control of song specificity in crickets. Science 180:82–83Google Scholar
- Hoy RR, Rollins S, Casaday G (1978) Absence of auditory afferents alters the growth pattern of an identified auditory interneuron. Soc Neurosci Abstr 4Google Scholar
- Huber F (1962) Central nervous control of sound production in crickets and some speculations on its evolution. Evolution 16:429–442Google Scholar
- Huber F (1963) The role of the central nervous system in Orthoptera during the co-ordination and control of stridulation. In: Busnel RD (ed) Acoustic behavior of animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 440–488Google Scholar
- Huber F (1975) Sensory and neuronal mechanisms underlying acoustic communication in orthopteran insects. In: Galun R, Hillman P, Parnis I, Werman R (eds) Sensory physiology and behavior. Plenum, New York, pp 55–97Google Scholar
- Huber F (1978) The insect nervous system and insect behavior. Anim Behav 26:969–981Google Scholar
- Iles JF, Mulloney B (1971) Procion yellow staining of cockroach motorneurons without the use of microelectrodes. Brain Res 30:397–400Google Scholar
- Kalmring K (1975) The afferent auditory pathway in the ventral nerve cord ofLocusta migratoria (Acrididae). J Comp Physiol 104:103–141Google Scholar
- Kien J (1976) A preliminary report on cobalt sulfide staining of locust visual interneurons through extracellular electrodes. Brain Res 109:158–164Google Scholar
- Miller LA (1975) The behavior of flying green lacewings,Chrysopa camea, in the presence of ultrasound. J Insect Physiol 21:205–219Google Scholar
- Moiseff A (1980) Auditory interneurons and phonotactic behavior in the Australian field cricket,Teleogryllus oceaniens. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca (New York)Google Scholar
- Moiseff A, Hoy RR (1979) Frequency dependent response properties of an identified interneuron in the cricketTeleogryllus oceaniens. Soc Neurosci Abstr 4:255Google Scholar
- Moiseff A, Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1978) Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: mate attraction and predator avoidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4052–4056Google Scholar
- Oldfield BP (1980) Accuracy of orientation in female crickets,Teleogryllus oceaniens (Gryllidae): dependence on song spectrum. J Comp Physiol 141:93–99Google Scholar
- Pitman RM, Tweedle CD, Cohen MJ (1972) Branching of central neurons, intracellular cobalt injection for light and electron microscopy. Science 176:412–414Google Scholar
- Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1979) Temporal pattern as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition in crickets. Science 204:429–432Google Scholar
- Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1981) Phonotaxis in flying crickets: neural correlates. J Insect Physiol 27:41–45Google Scholar
- Popov AV, Markovich AM (1982) Auditory interneurones in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus II. A high-frequency ascending neurone (HF1AN). J Comp Physiol 146:351–359Google Scholar
- Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J Comp Physiol 119:111–126Google Scholar
- Popov AV, Markovich AM, Andjan AS (1978) Auditory interneurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus deGeer. J Comp Physiol 126:183–192Google Scholar
- Popov AV, Shuvalov VF, Markovich AM (1975) Spectrum of the calling songs, phonotaxis and the auditory system in the cricketGryllus bimaculatus. J Evol Biochem Physiol 2:453–460Google Scholar
- Regen J (1913) Über die Anlockung des Weibchens vonGryllus campestris L. durch telephonisch übertragene Stridulationslaute des Männchens. Pflügers Arch 155:193–200Google Scholar
- Rehbein H, Kalmring K, Römer H (1974) Structure and function of acoustic neurons in the thoracic ventral nerve cord ofLocusta migratoria (Acrididae). J Comp Physiol 95:263–280Google Scholar
- Rheinlaender J, Kalmring K, Popov AV, Rehbein H (1976) Brain projections and information processing of biologically significant sounds by two large ventral-cord neurons ofGryllus bimaculatus DeGeer. J Comp Physiol 110:251–269Google Scholar
- Roeder KD (1967) Nerve cells and insect behavior. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Sachs M, Kiang N (1968) Two-tone inhibition in auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 43:1120–1128Google Scholar
- Shuvalov VF, Popov AV (1971) Reaction of flying females of the domestic cricket,Acheta domesticus to sound signals and its changes in ontogenesis. J Evol Physiol Biochem 7:612–616Google Scholar
- Stewart WW (1978) Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer. Cell 14:741–759Google Scholar
- Suga N (1968) Neural responses to sound in a Brazilian mole cricket. J Audit Res 8:129–134Google Scholar
- Thorson J, Weber T,- Huber F (1982) Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of the calling-song recognition inGryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol 146:361–378Google Scholar
- Tyrer NM, Bell EM (1974) The intensification of cobalt-filled profiles using a modification of Timm's sulfide-silver method. Brain Res 73:151–155Google Scholar
- Ulagaraj SM, Walker TJ (1973) Phonotaxis of crickets in flight: attraction of male and female crickets to male calling songs. Science 182:1278–1279Google Scholar
- Walker TJ (1957) Specificity in the response of female tree crickets (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Oecanthinae) to calling songs of the males. Ann Entomol Soc Am 50:626–636Google Scholar
- Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F (1981) Auditory behavior of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol 141:215–232Google Scholar
- Wohlers DW, Huber F (1978) Intracellular recording and staining of cricket auditory interneurons. J Comp Physiol 127:11–28Google Scholar
- Wohlers DW, Huber F (1982) Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus L. J Comp Physiol 146:161–173Google Scholar
- Zaretsky MD (1972) Specificity of the calling song and short term changes in the phonotactic response by female crickets (Scapsipedus marginatus) (Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 79:153–172Google Scholar