Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 165, Issue 6, pp 837–846 | Cite as

Neuromuscular activity during stridulation in the cricketTeleogryllus commodus

  • R. Matthias Hennig
Article
Accepted:

Summary

The central nervous control of singing behavior in male crickets (Teleogryllus commodus) has been investigated using electromyograms (EMG) and intracellular recording techniques. A preparation is described in which the species-specific stridulatory behavior can be elicited with the normal chirp and trill pattern. Stridulation was induced routinely in intact crickets as well as in crickets prepared for intracellular analysis (Fig. 1). p]
  1. 1.

    EMG recordings were taken from opener muscle 99 (subalar) and closer muscle 90 (remotor coxae) of intact singing animals. The intervals between bursts in both opener and closer muscles vary with cycle duration (opener to opener) and maintain their phase constancy. During the chirp the closer muscle activity (burst duration, number of spikes per burst) increases considerably as compared with the trill, but opener muscle activity remains unchanged (Fig. 2).

     
  2. 2.

    The preparation necessary for the intracellular analysis of motor patterns involved deafferentation of the thoracic ganglia, in which the stridulatory pattern generator resides. This resulted in an increase of the period duration in chirp and trill by about 20% (Fig. 3). Otherwise, only minor changes in the motor pattern were noted after deafferentation except for a marked increase in opener burst duration (Fig. 3), which did not affect the phase relationship described for the intact preparation.

     
  3. 3.

    The investigation of synaptic input to identified motoneurons 99 (opener) and 90 (closer) revealed differences in the burst patterns in these neurons during the chirp as compared with the trill, but also some common synaptic components (Figs. 6 and 7). This suggests that some interneurons are activated during the chirp and trill, whereas others are only activated during the chirp.

     

Keywords

Motor Pattern Cycle Duration Burst Duration Thoracic Ganglion Neuromuscular Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

EMG

electromyogram

MN

motoneuron

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bässler U (1983) Neural basis of elementary behavior in stick insects. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentley DR (1969) Intracellular activity in cricket neurons during generation of song patterns. Z Vergl Physiol 62:267–283Google Scholar
  3. Bentley DR (1971) Genetic control of an insect neuronal network. Science 174:1139–1141Google Scholar
  4. Bentley DR (1977) Control of cricket song patterns by descending interneurons. J Comp Physiol 116:19–38Google Scholar
  5. Bentley DR, Kutsch W (1966) The neuromuscular mechanism of stridulation in crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Exp Biol 45:151–164Google Scholar
  6. Dambach M, Rausche HG, Wendler G (1983) Proprioceptive feedback influences the calling song of the field cricket. Naturwissenschaften 70:417–418Google Scholar
  7. Delcomyn F (1984) Walking and running. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Nervous system: Structure and motor function (Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology, vol 5) Pergamon, Oxford, pp 439–466Google Scholar
  8. Elliott CJH (1983) Wing hair plates in crickets: Physiological characteristics and connections with stridulatory motor neurons. J Exp Biol 107:21–47Google Scholar
  9. Elliott CJH, Koch UT (1983) Sensory feedback stabilizing reliable stridulation in the field cricketGryllus campestris L. Anim Behav 31:887–901Google Scholar
  10. Farley RD, Case JF (1968) Sensory modulation of ventilative pacemaker output in the cockroach,Periplaneta americana. J Insect Physiol 14:591–601Google Scholar
  11. Grillner S (1977) On the neural control of movement — a comparison of different basic rhythmic behaviors. In: Stent GS (ed) Function and formation of neural systems. Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, pp 197–224Google Scholar
  12. Hedwig B (1986) On the role in stridulation of plurisegmental interneurons of the acridid grasshopperOmocestus viridulus L. I. Anatomy and physiology of descending cephalothoracic interneurons. J Comp Physiol A 158:413–427Google Scholar
  13. Huber F (1960) Untersuchungen über die Funktion des Zentralnervensystems und insbesondere des Gehirnes bei der Fortbewegung und der Lauterzeugung der Grillen. Z Vergl Physiol 44:60–132Google Scholar
  14. Koch UT, Elliott CJH, Schäffner KH, Kleindienst HU (1988) The mechanics of stridulation of the cricketGryllus campestris. J Comp Physiol A 162:213–223Google Scholar
  15. Kutsch W (1969) Neuromuskuläre Aktivität bei verschiedenen Verhaltensweisen von drei Grillenarten. Z Vergl Physiol 63:335–378Google Scholar
  16. Kutsch W, Huber F (1970) Zentrale versus periphere Kontrolle des Gesanges von Grillen (Gryllus campestris). Z Vergl Physiol 67:140–159Google Scholar
  17. Kutsch W, Otto D (1972) Evidence for spontaneous song production independent of head ganglia inGryllus campestris L. J Comp Physiol 81:115–119Google Scholar
  18. Möss D (1971) Sinnesorgane im Bereich des Flügels der Feldgrille (Gryllus campestris L.) und ihre Bedeutung für die Kontrolle der Singbewegung und die Einstellung der Flügellage. Z Vergl Physiol 73:53–83Google Scholar
  19. Otto D (1971) Untersuchungen zur zentralnervösen Kontrolle der Lauterzeugung von Grillen. Z Vergl Physiol 74:227–271Google Scholar
  20. Pearson KG, Wolf H (1987) Comparison of motor patterns in the intact and deafferented flight system of the locust. I. Electromyographic analysis. J Comp Physiol A 160:259–268Google Scholar
  21. Robertson RM (1987) Interneurons in the flight system of the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus. J Comp Physiol A 160:431–445Google Scholar
  22. Schäffner KH, Koch UT (1987) Effects of wing campaniform sensilla lesions on stridulation in crickets. J Exp Biol 129:25–40Google Scholar
  23. Selverston AI (1980) Are central pattern generators understandable? Behav Brain Sci 3:535–571Google Scholar
  24. Wang S, Robertson RM (1989) Morphological study of flight motor neurons in the cricket. J Comp Neurol 279:272–280Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Matthias Hennig
    • 1
  1. 1.Molecular Neurobiology Group, Research School of Biological SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberra CityAustralia

Personalised recommendations