Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 156, Issue 2, pp 243–266 | Cite as

The physiology of vocalization by the echolocating oilbird,Steatornis caripensis

  • Roderick A. Suthers
  • Dwight H. Hector
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis; Steatornithidae) have a bilaterally asymmetrical bronchial syrinx (Fig. 2) with which they produce echolocating clicks and a variety of social vocalizations. The sonar clicks typically have a duration of about 40 to 50 ms and can be classified as continuous, double or single. Agonistic squawks typically have a duration of about 0.5 s and contain multiple harmonic components (Figs. 5, 6).

     
  2. 2.

    Both sonar clicks and agonistic squawks are initiated by contraction of the sternotrachealis muscles (Figs. 7 and 16) which stretch the trachea, reducing the tension across the syrinx and causing the cartilaginous bronchial semi-rings supporting the cranial and caudal edges of the external tympaniform membranes (ETM) to hinge inward, folding the ETM into the syringeal lumen (Fig. 17). Bernoulli forces created by expiratory air flowing through the restricted syringeal aperture presumably initiate vibration of the internal and/or external tympaniform membranes.

     
  3. 3.

    Social vocalizations such as the agonistic squawk, continue until the sternotrachealis muscles relax (Fig. 10), allowing the cranial portion of the bronchus to move anteriad and abducting the ETM.

     
  4. 4.

    Sonar clicks are terminated by rapid contraction of a previously undescribed intrinsic syringeal muscle, the broncholateralis, which inserts on the semi-ring supporting the anterior edge of the ETM and causes it to rotate about its articulation with the next anterior bronchial cartilage in such a way that it abducts the ETM (Figs. 8, 16, 17). Musculus broncholateralis contracts only during sonar clicks, appears to have a high proportion of twitch-type fibers, and is specialized for the rapid abduction of the ETM to produce short duration, click-like vocalizations.

     
  5. 5.

    Tracheal airflow and sternal air sac pressure reflect the changes in the syringeal aperture. Tracheal airflow at first increases as expiratory effort increases subsyringeal pressure. The initial high rate of airflow drops at the onset of phonation due to the increased syringeal resistance. In the case of a double click, airflow momentarily ceases during the intraclick interval when the ETM temporarily closes the syrinx. Air sac pressure rises to its maximum level at this time. Expiratory airflow rapidly increases as the ETM is abducted from either its closed or phonatory position to its open, resting position. Each sonar click requires about 1 cm3 of air; a typical agonistic squawk may use about 27 cm3 of air (Figs. 11, 12, 13; Tables 3, 4).

     
  6. 6.

    Each sonar click is often accompanied by a complete respiratory cycle or ‘mini-breath’ (Fig. 11). Pulmonary ventilation can be controlled independently from the clicking rate by varying the tidal volume of the mini-breaths, which may be as small as the tracheal and bronchial dead space. Mini-breaths permit oilbirds to produce click trains having a long train duration uninterrupted by a long inspiration.

     
  7. 7.

    A dual flow probe was used to simultaneously measure the rate of airflow through each semi-syrinx during vocalization. The rate of airflow through the right semi-syrinx was 40 to 60% greater than that through the left. Both syringes functioned together except during the middle portion of some continuous type sonar clicks when sound was sometimes generated only by one semi-syrinx, the other being closed (Figs. 14, 15; Tables 5, 6).

     
  8. 8.

    The fluid subsyringeal power reaches approximately 100 and 150 mW in the left and right semi-syrinx, respectively, during the second member of a double sonar click (Table 6). Total syringeal power during agonistic squawks reaches at least 60 mW and syringeal resistance during these vocalizations is as high as 1500 cm H20/LPS (Table 7).

     

Abbreviations

EMG

electromyogram

ETM

external tympaniform membrane(s)

ITM

internal tympaniform membrane

LPS

liters/second

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beddard FE (1885) On structural characters and classification of the cuckoos. Proc Zool Soc (Lond) 1885:168–187Google Scholar
  2. Beddard FE (1886) On the syrinx and other points in the anatomy of the Caprimulgidae. Proc Zool Soc (Lond) 1886:147–153Google Scholar
  3. Beddard FE (1902) On the syrinx and other points in the structure ofHierococcyx and some allied genera of cuckoos. Ibis 2:599–608Google Scholar
  4. Berger AJ (1960) Some anatomical characters of the Cuculidae and the Musophagidae. Wilson Bull 72:60–104Google Scholar
  5. Brackenbury JH (1972) Lung-air-sac anatomy and respiratory pressures in the bird. J Exp Biol 57:543–550Google Scholar
  6. Brackenbury JH (1977) Physiological energetics of cock-crow. Nature 270:433–435Google Scholar
  7. Brackenbury JH (1978) Respiratory mechanics of sound production in chickens and geese. J Exp Biol 72:229–250Google Scholar
  8. Brackenbury JH (1980) Control of sound production in the syrinx of the fowl,Gallus gallus. J Exp Biol 85:239–251Google Scholar
  9. Brackenbury JH (1982) The structural basis of voice production and its relationship to sound characteristics. In: Kroodsma D, Miller E (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 53–73Google Scholar
  10. Calder WA (1970) Respiration during song in the canary,Serinus canaria. Comp Biochem Physiol 32:251–258Google Scholar
  11. Chamberlain DR, Cross WB, Cornwell GW, Mosby HS (1968) Syringeal anatomy in the common crow. Auk 89:244–252Google Scholar
  12. Duncker H-R (1971) The lung air sac system of birds. A contribution to the functional anatomy of the respiratory apparatus. Erg Anat Entwicklungsgesch 45:1–171Google Scholar
  13. Gadow H, Selenka E (1891) Aves. In: Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, vol 6, Part IV, No 1, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrod AH (1873) On some points in the anatomy ofSteatornis. Proc Zool Soc (Lond) 1873:457–472Google Scholar
  15. Gaunt AS, Stein RC, Gaunt SLL (1973) Pressure and air flow during distress calls of the starling,Sturnis vulgaris (Aves: Passeriformes). J Exp Zool 183:241–262Google Scholar
  16. Gaunt AS, Gaunt SLL, Hector DH (1976) Mechanics of the syrinx inGallus gallus. I. A comparison of pressure events in chickens to those in oscines. Condor 78:208–223Google Scholar
  17. Gaunt AS, Gaunt SLL, Casey RM (1982) Syringeal mechanics reassessed: Evidence fromStreptopelia. Auk 99:474–494Google Scholar
  18. Griffin DR (1953) Acoustic orientation in the oilbird,Steatornis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 39:884–893Google Scholar
  19. Griffin DR, Thompson D (1982) Echolocation by cave swiftlets. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:119–123Google Scholar
  20. Gross WB (1964) Voice production by the chicken. Poult Sci 43:1005–1008Google Scholar
  21. Hess A (1965) The sarcoplasmic reticulum, the T-system and the motor terminals of slow and twitch muscle fibers in the Garter Snake. J Cell Biol 26:467–476Google Scholar
  22. Konishi M, Knudsen E (1979) The oilbird: Hearing and echolocation. Science 204:425–427Google Scholar
  23. Kulzer E (1956) Flughunde erzeugen Orientierungslaute durch Zungenschlag. Naturwissenschaften 43:117–118Google Scholar
  24. Kulzer E (1960) Physiologische und morpholoigsche Untersuchungen über die Erzeugung der Orientierungslaute von Flughunden der GattungRousettus. Z Vergl Physiol 43:231–268Google Scholar
  25. Miller AH (1934) The vocal apparatus of some North American Owls. Condor 36:204–213Google Scholar
  26. Miskimen M (1951) Sound production in passerine birds. Auk 68:493–504Google Scholar
  27. Müller J (1841) Über die Anatomie desSteatornis caripensis. Akademie der Wissenschaften Bericht, Berlin, pp 172–179Google Scholar
  28. Müller J (1842) Anatomische Bemerkungen über den Quacharo (Steatornis caripensis). Arch Anat Physiol Wissenschaft Medicin (Müller's Arch), Berlin, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  29. Page SG (1965) A comparison of the fine structures of frog slow and twitch muscle fibers. J Cell Biol 26:477–490Google Scholar
  30. Pye JD (1980) Echolocation signals and echoes in air. In: Busnel R-G, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum, New York, pp 309–353Google Scholar
  31. Roberts LH (1972) Correlation of respiration and ultrasound production in rodents and bats. J Zool 168:439–449Google Scholar
  32. Schnitzler H-U (1968) Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408Google Scholar
  33. Seller TJ (1979) Unilateral nervous control of the syrinx in Java Sparrows, (Padda oryzivora). J Comp Physiol 129:281–288Google Scholar
  34. Smith DG (1977) The role of the sternotrachealis muscles in birdsong production. Auk 94:152–155Google Scholar
  35. Snow DW (1961) The natural history of the oilbird,Steatornis caripensis, in Trinidad, WI. I. General behavior and breeding habits. Zoologica 46:27–48Google Scholar
  36. Snow DW (1962) The natural history of the oilbird,Steatornis caripensis, in Trinidad, WI. II. Population, breeding ecology and food. Zoologica 47:199–221Google Scholar
  37. Suthers RA, Fattu JM (1973) Mechanisms of sound production by echolocating bats. Am Zool 13:2115–1226Google Scholar
  38. Suthers RA, Hector DH (1982) Mechanism for the production of echolocating clicks by the grey swiftlet,Collocalia spodiopygia. J Comp Physiol 148:457–470Google Scholar
  39. Suthers RA, Thomas SP, Suthers BJ (1972) Respiration, wingbeat and pulse emission in an echolocating bat. J Exp Biol 56:37–48Google Scholar
  40. Wunderlich L (1884) Beiträge zur vergleichenden Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte des unteren Kehlkopfes der Vögel. Leopoldinisch-Carolinische Deutsch Akad Naturforscher. Nova Acta 48:1–80Google Scholar
  41. Youngren OM, Peek FW, Phillips RE (1974) Repetitive vocalizations evoked by local electrical stimulation of avian brains: III. Evoked activity in the tracheal muscles of the chicken (Gallus gallus). Brain Behav Evol 9:393–421Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick A. Suthers
    • 2
  • Dwight H. Hector
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MedicineIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations