Trends in peptic ulcer related diseases from 1972 to 1980
- 21 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Summary
Between 1972 and 1980 Hospital Activity Analysis from 5 Northern Ireland Hospitals demonstrated a gradual increase in the number of patients discharged for all diagnoses whilst there was a decline in discharges for peptic ulcer related disease, (duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, gastrojejunal ulcer, peptic ulcer site unspecified and hiatal hernia). The mean number of peptic ulcer related disease discharges per year for 1977–80, when cimetidine became generally available, was 10% lower than that of 1972–76, mainly due to a decline in male patient numbers. The mean annual number of male patients with a duodenal ulcer fell significantly by 18% (U=1,p≤0.025) during the 1977–80 period, whereas female discharges decreased by only 4%. Between 1972–76 and 1977–80 the mean annual number of duodenal ulcer perforations decreased significantly by 21% in males but only by 4% in females. Surgery for peptic ulcer related disease was 47% less in 1977–80 period, with significant decreases in duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and hiatal hernia procedures. From 1977 to 1980 there was considerable growth in Northern Ireland general practice cimetidine prescribing with 300,000 prescriptions being dispensed over the period. Apart from male duodenal ulcer cases, hospitalisation for peptic ulcer related diseases did not decrease substantially after the introduction of cimetidine but duodenal ulcer perforation and conditions warranting surgery did decline.
Key words
cimetidine peptic ulcer duodenal ulcer gastric ulcer hiatal hernia surgeryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Baron JH, Langman MJS, Wastell C (1980) Stomach and duodenum. In: Bouchier IAD (ed) Recent advances in gastroenterology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 23–86Google Scholar
- 2.Delle Fave GF, Kohn A, Sparvoli C et al (1980) Gastric ulcer. In: Torsoli A, Lucchelli PE, Brimblecombe RW (eds) H2-antagonists. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 26–30Google Scholar
- 3.Manual of the international statistical classification of diseases, injuries and cause of death, Vol 1 (1967). World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 4.Registrar General 51st–58th Annual reports of the Registrar General, Northern Ireland (1972–1979). HMSO, Belfast, 1973–82. 59th Annual report for 1980 in pressGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lunde PKM, Baksaas I, Halse M et al (1979) The methodology of drug utilization studies. In: Bergman U, Grímsson A, Wahba AHW, Westerholm B (eds) Studies in drug utilization methods and applications. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, pp 17–28Google Scholar
- 6.Daniel WW (1978) Applied nonparametric statistics. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp 82–87, 300–306Google Scholar
- 7.MacKay C (1977) Prevalence of peptic ulcer and its complications. Scott Med J 22: 288–289Google Scholar
- 8.Sturdevant RAL (1976) Epidemiology of peptic ulcer. Am J Epidemiol 104: 9–14Google Scholar
- 9.Langman MJS (1980) The tide of peptic ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol 15: 149–159Google Scholar
- 10.Friedenwald J (1912) A clinical study of a thousand cases of ulcer of the stomach and duodenum. Am J Med Sci 144: 157–170Google Scholar
- 11.Metman EH, Jougla E, Maguin P, Diaz-Vides R et al (1980) Morbidité digestive diagnostiqueé chez l'adule résultats d'une enquête épidémiologique. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 4: 858–869Google Scholar
- 12.Evans AE (1978) Accuracy of hospital activity analysis data in the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, 1973. J Ir Med Assoc 71: 421–423Google Scholar
- 13.Martini CJM, Hughes AO, Paton VA (1976) A study of the validity of the hospital activity analysis information. Br J Prev Soc Med 30: 180–186Google Scholar
- 14.“What has been happening to peptic ulcer in Scotland” ISD occasional Paper No. 2. Scottish Health Service Common Services Agency, South Trinity Road, Edinburgh EH5 3SQGoogle Scholar
- 15.Elashoff JD, Grossman MI (1980) Trends in hospital admissions and death rates for peptic ulcer in the United States from 1970 to 1978. Gastroenterology 78: 280–285Google Scholar
- 16.Brown RC, Langman MJS, Lambert PM (1976) Hospital admissions for peptic ulcer during 1958–1972. Br Med J 1: 35–37Google Scholar
- 17.Coggon D, Lambert P, Langman MPS (1981) 20 years of hospital admissions for peptic ulcer in England and Wales. Lancet 1: 1302–1304Google Scholar
- 18.Vogt TM, Johnson RE (1980) Recent changes in the incidence of duodenal and gastric ulcer. Am J Epidemiol 3: 713–720Google Scholar
- 19.Penn I (1980) The declining role of the surgeon in the treatment of acidpeptic disease. Arch Surg 115: 134–135Google Scholar
- 20.Fineberg HV, Pearlman LA (1981) Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer in the United States. Lancet 1: 1305–1307Google Scholar
- 21.Wyllie JH, Alexander-Williams J, Kennedy TL et al (1981) Effect of cimetidine on surgery for duodenal ulcer. Lancet 1: 1307–1308Google Scholar
- 22.Scottish Hospital In-patient Statistics. Unpublished data. Scottish Health Service Common Services Agency, Trinity Park House, South Trinity Road, Edinburgh, EH5 3SQ.Google Scholar
- 23.Venables CW (1980) Indications for surgery in duodenal ulcer non-responders to cimetidine. In: Torsoli A, Lucchelli PE, Brimblecombe RW (eds) H2-antagonists. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 16–23Google Scholar
- 24.Bardhan KD, Hinchliffe RFC (1981) Effect of cimetidine on surgery for duodenal ulcer (letter). Lancet 2: 38Google Scholar
- 25.Bader JP, Morin T, Bernier JJ et al (1977) Treatment of gastric ulcer by cimetidine. A multicentre trial. In: Burland WA, Simkins MA (eds) Cimetidine. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Histamine H2-receptor Antagonists. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 287–292Google Scholar
- 26.Coli-Jones DG, Misiewicz JJ, Milton-Thompson GJ et al (1978). Cimetidine and carbenoxolone in gastric ulcer. In: Wastell C, Lance P (eds) The Westminster Hospital Symposium. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 289–291Google Scholar