Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 217–229 | Cite as

Taste and tactile recordings from the ramus recurrens facialis innervating flank taste buds in the catfish

  • Cynthia J. Davenport
  • John Caprio


  1. 1.

    The ramus recurrens facialis (VII) innervating the flank of the channel catfish,Ictalurus punctatus, responded to both amino acid (Fig. 2–10; Table 1) and mechanical (Fig. 11) stimulation of the flank skin.

  2. 2.

    The integrated phasic gustatory responses generally increased exponentially with logarithmic increase in stimulus concentration over a wide concentration range with a tendency for saturation at concentrations ≧10−4.5 M (Fig. 6).

  3. 3.

    l-alanine andl-arginine HCl were the most stimulatory compounds tested, with thresholds averaging 10−8.6±0.4m (M±SE) (Fig. 4; Table 1).

  4. 4.

    Cross-adaptation experiments suggest that alanine and arginine bind to relatively independent receptor sites on the taste cells (Fig. 10; Table 1); further, single-unit studies indicate the recurrent nerve is composed of at least two types of amino acid sensitive taste fibers, alanine-best and arginine-best fibers (Fig. 8). In general, unit responses were consistent with the multiunit data (Table 1).

  5. 5.

    Taste fibers of the recurrent nerve are relatively insensitive to sodium chloride and sucrose; generally, responses were obtained to quinine hydrochloride and hydrochloric acid, but only at relatively high stimulus concentrations (≧10−4 M, Fig. 7).

  6. 6.

    Taste responses of the recurrent nerve are similar to the results obtained from maxillary barbel taste recordings in the same species (Caprio 1975, 1978), suggesting an analogous chemical response profile of facially innervated taste buds irrespective of their anatomical location in the catfish.

  7. 7.

    Intra-cranial neural recordings from the recurrent nerve indicate that the tactile responsiveness observed in the present experiments was not attributable to spinal innervation of the flank. The size and contour of the mechanoreceptive flank region innervated by teased bundles of the recurrent nerve varied greatly; some single units responded to both chemical and mechanical stimuli (Fig. 11).



LLac accessory

lateral line nerve


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atema J (1971) Structures and functions of the sense of taste in the catfish (Ictalurus natalis). Brain Behav Evol 4:273–294Google Scholar
  2. Bardach JE, Case J (1965) Sensory capabilities of the modified fins of Squirrel hake (Urophycis chuss) and Searobins (Prionotus carolinus andP. evolans). Copeia 2:194–206Google Scholar
  3. Bardach JE, Fujiya M, Holl A (1967a) Investigations of external chemoreceptors of fishes. In: Hayashi T (ed) Olfaction and taste, vol II. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY pp 647–665Google Scholar
  4. Bardach JE, Todd JH, Crickmer R (1967b) Orientation by taste in fish of the genusIctalurus. Science 155:1276–1278Google Scholar
  5. Biedenbach MA (1973) Functional properties and projection areas of cutaneous receptors in catfish. J Comp Physiol 84:227–250Google Scholar
  6. Cagan RH, Rhein LD (1980) Biochemical basis of recognition of taste and olfactory stimuli. In: Starre H van der (ed) Olfaction and taste, vol VII. I.R.L. Press, Washington, DC, pp 35–44Google Scholar
  7. Cagan RH, Teeter JH (1980) Selective inhibition of binding to a taste receptor site. Soc Neurosci Abstr 6:304Google Scholar
  8. Caprio J (1975) High sensitivity of catfish taste receptors to amino acids. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 52:247–251Google Scholar
  9. Caprio J (1978) Olfaction and taste in the channel catfish: an electrophysiological study of the responses to amino acids and derivatives. J Comp Physiol 123:357–371Google Scholar
  10. Caprio J (1980) Similarity of olfactory receptor responses (EOG) of freshwater and marine catfish to amino acids. Can J Zool 58:1773–1784Google Scholar
  11. Caprio J (1982) High sensitivity and specificity of olfactory and gustatory receptors of catfish to amino acids. In: Hara TJ (ed) Chemoreception in fishes. Elsevier, New York, pp 109–134Google Scholar
  12. Caprio J, Tucker D (1976) Specialist and generalist taste fibers in the catfish. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2:152Google Scholar
  13. Finger TE (in press) The gustatory system in teleost fish. In: Northcutt RG, Davis RE (ed) Fish neurobiology and behavior, vol I. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  14. Freihofer WC (1963) Patterns of the ramus lateralis accessorius and their systematic significance in teleostean fishes. Stanford Ichthyol Bull 8:89–189Google Scholar
  15. Fujiya M, Bardach JE (1966) A comparison between the external taste sense of marine and freshwater fishes. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 32:45–56Google Scholar
  16. Goh Y, Tamura T (1980) Olfactory and gustatory responses to amino acids in two marine teleosts — red sea bream and mullet. Comp Biochem Physiol [C] 66:217–224Google Scholar
  17. Herrick CJ (1901) The cranial nerves and cutaneous sense organs of the North American siluroid fishes. J Comp Neurol 11:177–249Google Scholar
  18. Herrick CJ (1904) The organ and sense of taste in fishes. Bull US Fish Commis 22:237–272Google Scholar
  19. Hidaka I, Kiyohara S, Tabata M, Yonezawa K (1975) Gustatory responses in the puffer. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 41:275–281Google Scholar
  20. Hidaka I, Ohsugi T, Kubomatsu T (1978) Taste receptor stimulation and feeding behavior in the puffer,Fugu pardalis. I. Effect of single chemicals. Chem Senses Flavor 3:341–354Google Scholar
  21. Hoagland H (1932) Impulses from sensory nerves of catfish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 18:701–705Google Scholar
  22. Holland KN, Teeter JH (1981) Behavioral and cardiac reflex assays of the chemosensory acuity of channel catfish to amino acids. Physiol Behav 27:699–707Google Scholar
  23. Johnsen PB, Teeter JH (1980) Spatial gradient detection of chemical cues by catfish. J Comp Physiol 140:95–99Google Scholar
  24. Kaku T, Tsumagari M, Kiyohara S, Yamashita S (1980) Gustatory responses in the minnow,Pseudorasbora parva. Physiol Behav 25:99–105Google Scholar
  25. Kasahara Y, Kawamura Y (1975) Mechano-sensitive afferent fibers in the chorda tympani. J Physiol Soc Jpn 37:286Google Scholar
  26. Katsuki Y, Hashimoto J, Kendall I (1971) The chemoreception in the lateral-line organs of teleosts. Jpn J Physiol 21:99–118Google Scholar
  27. Kiyohara S, Tucker D (1978) Activity of new receptors after transection of the primary olfactory nerve in pigeons. Physiol Behav 21:987–994Google Scholar
  28. Kiyohara S, Hidaka I, Tamura T (1975a) Gustatory response in the puffer II. Single fiber analysis. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 41:383–391Google Scholar
  29. Kiyohara S, Hidaka T, Tamura T (1975b) The anterior cranial gustatory pathway in fish. Experientia 31:1051–1053Google Scholar
  30. Kiyohara S, Yamashita S, Harada S (1981) High sensitivity of minnow gustatory receptors to amino acids. Physiol Behav 26:1103–1108Google Scholar
  31. Konishi J, Hidaka I (1967) Stimulation of the chemoreceptors of the sea catfish by dilute electrolyte solutions. Jpn J Physiol 17:726–737Google Scholar
  32. Konishi J, Zotterman Y (1961) Taste functions in the carp. Acta Physiol Scand 52:150–161Google Scholar
  33. Konishi J, Uchida M, Mori Y (1966) Gustatory fibers in the sea catfish. Jpn J Physiol 16:194–204Google Scholar
  34. Little EE (1981) Conditioned cardiac response to the olfactory stimuli of amino acids in the channel catfish,Ictalurus punctatus. Physiol Behav 27:691–697Google Scholar
  35. Martin AR, Wickelgren WO (1971) Sensory cells in the spinal cord of the sea lamprey. J Physiol (Lond) 212:65–83Google Scholar
  36. Marui T, Funakoshi M (1979) Tactile input to the facial lobe of the carp,Cyprinus carpio L. Brain Res 177:479–488Google Scholar
  37. Peters RC, Loop WJG, Gerritsen A (1974) Distribution of electroreceptors, bioelectric field patterns, and skin resistance in the catfish,Ictalurus nebulosus Les. J Comp Physiol 92:11–22Google Scholar
  38. Pfaffmann C (1978) The vertebrate phylogeny, neural code, and integrative processes of taste. In: Carterette EC, Freidman MP (ed) Handbook of perception, tasting and smelling, vol VIA. Academic Press, N.Y. pp 51–123Google Scholar
  39. Reutter K (1978) Taste organ in the bullhead (Teleostei). Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 55:1–98Google Scholar
  40. Roberts A, Hayes BP (1977) The anatomy and function of ‘free’ nerve endings in an amphibian skin sensory system. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 196:415–429Google Scholar
  41. Silver WL (1979a) Electrophysiological responses from the olfactory system of the American eel. PhD dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida USAGoogle Scholar
  42. Silver WL (1979b) Olfactory responses from a marine elasmobranch, the Atlantic stingray,Dasyatus sabina. Mar Behav Physiol 6:297–305Google Scholar
  43. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 1–776Google Scholar
  44. Späth M, Schweickert W (1977) The effect of metacaine (MS-222) on the activity of the efferent and afferent nerves in the teleost lateral-line system. Arch Pharmacol 297:9–16Google Scholar
  45. Stevens SS (1957) On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev 64:153–181Google Scholar
  46. Stewart A, Bryant B, Atema J (1979) Behavioral evidence for two populations of amino acid receptors in catfish taste. Biol Bull 157:396Google Scholar
  47. Sutterlin AM, Sutterlin N (1970) Taste responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) Parr. J Fish Res Board Can 27:1927–1942Google Scholar
  48. Sutterlin AM, Sutterlin N (1971) Electrical responses of the olfactory epithelium of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Fish Res Board Can 28:565–572Google Scholar
  49. Suzuki N, Tucker D (1971) Amino acids as olfactory stimuli in freshwater catfish,Ictalurus catus (L). Comp Biochem Physiol[A] 40:399–404Google Scholar
  50. Suzuki N (1978) Effects of different ionic environments on the responses of single olfactory receptors in the lamprey. Comp Biochem Physiol 41:461–467Google Scholar
  51. Tateda H (1961) Response of catfish barbels to taste stimuli. Nature 192:343–344Google Scholar
  52. Tateda H (1964) The taste response of the isolated barbel of the catfish. Comp Biochem Physiol 11:367–378Google Scholar
  53. Yamane S (1978) Influence of ions and chemical substances on the response of the frog's tongue to mechanical stimulation. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 61:451–459Google Scholar
  54. Yoshii K, Kamo N, Kurihara K, Kobatake Y (1979) Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids. J Gen Physiol 74:301–317Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia J. Davenport
    • 1
  • John Caprio
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and PhysiologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations