Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 161, Issue 1, pp 59–66 | Cite as

The role of prey-generated sounds, vision, and echolocation in prey localization by the African batCardioderma cor (Megadermatidae)

  • Michael J. Ryan
  • Merlin D. Tuttle
Article

Summary

Cardioderma cor responded with head movements and flight toward speakers broadcasting calls of frogs and crickets which contained only sonic frequencies. Unlike the frog-eating bat,Trachops cirrhosus, they did not make contact with the speakers. Prey movements that generated sonic and ultrasonic sounds were both sufficient and necessary for the bats to localize and capture prey. Prey dragged across a glass sheet with a thin layer of water did not generate sounds and bats did not attempt to capture these prey, even with the availability of visual and echolocation cues. There was no evidence for the use of visual cues while hunting; bats did not localize prey more readily in light than darkness. Prey were presented such that their movements initially generated sounds, but then the prey moved onto the water layer of the glass sheet and sounds were eliminated. The bats emitted echolocation signals while hunting in this situation; however, the information from these signals was not utilized. The bats landed at the site that prey last made sound. These results demonstrate the importance of passive hearing for prey localization in this bat, and further suggest that when preygenerated sounds and echolocation signals offer conflicting information the bat's behavior is guided by the former.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell GP (1982) Behavioral and ecological aspects of gleaning by a desert insectivorous bat,Antrozous pallidus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:217–223Google Scholar
  2. Buchler ER, Childs SB (1981) Orientation to distant sounds by foraging big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Anim Behav 29:428–432Google Scholar
  3. Chase J (1981) Visually guided escape response in microchiropteran bats. Anim Behav 29:708–713Google Scholar
  4. Chase J (1983) Differential response to visual and acoustic cues during escape in the batAnoura geoffroyi. Anim Behav 31:526–531Google Scholar
  5. Fiedler J (1979) Prey catching with and without echolocation in the Indian false vampire bat (Megaderma lyra). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:155–160Google Scholar
  6. Fuzessery ZM, Pollak GD (1984) Neural mechanisms of sound localization in an echolocating bat. Science 225:725–728Google Scholar
  7. Grinnell AD, Grinnell VS (1965) Neural correlates of vertical localization by an echolocating bat. J Physiol 181:830–851Google Scholar
  8. Guppy A (1985) Comparative acoustical and physiological studies of hearing and directionality in vertebrates. PhD thesis, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  9. Kingdon J (1974) East African mammals. An atlas of evolution in Africa, vol IIA, Insectivores and bats. Univ Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Link A, Marimuthu G, Neuweiler G (1986) Movement as a specific stimulus for prey localization behavior in rhinolophid and hipposiderid bats. J Comp Physiol A 159:403–413Google Scholar
  11. Masters WM, Moffat AJM, Simmons JA (1985) Sonar tracking of horizontally moving targets by the big brown batEptesicus fuscus. Science 228:1331–1333Google Scholar
  12. Neuweiler G (1984) Foraging, echolocation, and audition in bats. Naturwissenschaften 71:446–455Google Scholar
  13. Neuweiler G, Singh S, Sripathi K (1984) Audiograms of a south Indian bat community. J Comp Physiol A 154:133–142Google Scholar
  14. Otte D (1983) African crickets (Gryllidae). 2.Afrogryllopsis Randell andNeogryllopsis n. gen. of eastern and southern Africa. Proc Acad Natl Sci Philadelphia 135:218–235Google Scholar
  15. Pettigrew JD, Coles RB, Gruppy A, Brown M, Nelson J (1983) Sensory ability of the Australian ghost bat,Macroderma gigas. Neurosci Lett [Suppl] 11: S68Google Scholar
  16. Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD (1983) The ability of the frog-eating bat to discriminate among novel and potentially poisonous frog species using acoustic cues. Anim Behav 31:827–833Google Scholar
  17. Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Rand AS (1982) Bat predation and sexual advertisement in a Neotropical frog,Physalaemus pustulosus. Am Nat 119:136–139Google Scholar
  18. Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Barclay RMR (1983) Behavioral responses of the frog-eating bat,Trachops cirrhosus, to sonic frequencies. J Comp Physiol 150:413–418Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt S, Turke B, Vogler B (1984) Behavioural audiograms from the batMegaderma lyra (Geoffrey, 1810; Microchiroptera). Myotis 22:62–66Google Scholar
  20. Simmons JA, Kick SA, Lawrence BD, Hale C, Bard C, Escudie B (1983) Acuity of horizontal angel discrimination by the echolocating bat,Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol 153:321–330Google Scholar
  21. Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ(1981) Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the Neotropics. Science 214:677–678Google Scholar
  22. Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ, Belwood JJ (1985) Acoustical resource partitioning by two species of phyllostomid bats (Trachops cirrhosus andTonatia sylvicola). Anim Behav 33:1369–1371Google Scholar
  23. Vaughan TA (1976) Nocturnal behavior of the African false vampire bat (Cardioderma cor). J Mammal 57:227–248Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Ryan
    • 1
  • Merlin D. Tuttle
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  2. 2.Brackenridge Field LaboratoryUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations