Microspectrophotometry ofDrosophila visual pigments: Determinations of conversion efficiency in R1–6 receptors
- 70 Downloads
- 27 Citations
Summary
We used microspectrophotometry, together with some associated electrophysiological measurements, to characterize the photopigments of R1–6 receptors in living, white-eyedDrosophila. Measurements were from the deep pseudopupil, an optical visualization of photopigment-containing rhabdomeres. Transmission changes associated with photointerconversion of rhodopsin (R480) and its stable metarhodopsin (M570) are easily seen (Fig. 1). Such transmission changes were measured to produce a difference specrum (Fig. 2); the isosbestic wavelength is about 502 nm. A photoequilibrium spectrum (Fig. 3), analyzed together with sensitivity data (Fig. 4a), was used to determine the fraction of M570 in photoequilibria established with various monochromatic wavelengths. From this, the quantum efficiency for M570 to R480 conversion relative to R480 to M570 efficiency was determined to be about 0.71. No dark regeneration of M570 to R480 occurred within a period of 60min (Fig. 4a, b).
The extent of conversion related to incident energy was estimated as a function of wavelength (Figs. 5 and 6). These experiments yielded the photosensitivity spectrum of the visual pigment (Fig. 6). Assuming that the absorption spectrum of rhodopsin (R480) is the same as the sensitivity spectrum as determined by electrophysiology, this photosensitivity spectrum was used to derive the spectrum of metarhodopsin (M570) (Fig. 7). The maximal extinction of M570 is about 1.43 times the maximal extinction of R480. The spectra of both states of the photopigment fit the Ebrey-Honig nomogram in the long wavelength band. Both of the photosensitivity spectra, measured in the living eye, associated with R480 and M570 respectively have a major UV maximum.
Keywords
Absorption Spectrum Conversion Efficiency Quantum Efficiency Incident Energy Dark RegenerationAbbreviations
- ERG
electroretinogram
- M orM570
metarhodopsin of R1–6
- NA
numerical aperture
- PDA
prolonged depolarizing afterpotential
- R orR480
rhodopsin of R1–6
- R1–6
retinula cells with peripheral rhabdomeres
- R7 andR8
retinula cells with central rhabdomeres
- SE
standard error
- UV
ultraviolet
- A, a, c, D, e, f, I, l. m, Q, S, t, α, γ, λ., Φ
symbols used in quantitative treatment, see Methods
- bw, cn, norpA, sev, w
Drosophila mutants, see Methods
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Burkhardt, D.: Spectral sensitivity and other response characteristics of single cells in the arthropod eye. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.16, 86–109 (1962)Google Scholar
- Burkhardt, D.: On the vision of insects. J. Comp. Physiol.120, 33–50 (1977)Google Scholar
- Dartnall, H.J.A.: The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. Br. Med. Bull.9, 24–30 (1953)Google Scholar
- Dartnall, H.J.A.: Photosensitivity. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/I. Dartnall, H.J.A. (ed.), pp. 122–145. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972Google Scholar
- Dartnall, H.J.A., Goodeve, C.F., Lythgoe, R.J.: The quantitative analysis of the photochemical bleaching of visual purple solutions in monochromatic light. Proc. R. Soc. (London) Ser. A156, 158–170 (1936)Google Scholar
- Doane, W.W.: Drosophila. In: Methods in developmental biology. Wilt, F.H., Wessells, N.K. (eds.). New York: Crowell 1967Google Scholar
- Ebrey, T.G., Honig, B.: New wavelength dependent visual pigment nomograms. Vision Res.17, 147–151 (1977)Google Scholar
- Eguchi, E., Waterman, T.H.: Freeze-etch and histochemical evidence for cycling in crayfish photoreceptor membranes. Cell Tissue Res.169, 419–434 (1976)Google Scholar
- Fernandez, H.R., Nickel, E.E.: Ultrastructural and molecular characteristics of crayfish photoreceptor membranes. J. Cell Biol.69, 721–732 (1976)Google Scholar
- Franceschini, N.: Sampling of the visual environment by the compound eye of the fly: Fundamentals and applications. In: Photoreceptor optics. Synder, A.W., Menzel, R. (eds.), pp. 98–125. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1975Google Scholar
- Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K.: Les phénomènes de pseudopupille dans l'oeil composé deDrosophila. Kybernetik9, 159–182 (1971)Google Scholar
- Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K.: Le contrôle automatique du flux lumineaux dans l'oeil composé des Diptères: Propriétés spectrales, statiques et dynamiques du mécanisme. Biol. Cybern.21, 181–203 (1976)Google Scholar
- Hagins, W.A.: The visual process: Excitatory processes in primary receptor cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng.1, 131–158 (1972)Google Scholar
- Hamdorf, K.: The physiology of invertebrate visual pigments. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/6A. Autrum, H. (ed.), pp. 145–224. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1979Google Scholar
- Hamdorf, K., Rosner, G.: Adaptation und Photoregeneration im Fliegenauge. J. Comp. Physiol.86, 281–292 (1973)Google Scholar
- Hamdorf, K., Schwemer, J.: Photoregeneration and the adaptation process in insect photoreceptors. In: Photoreceptor optics. Snyder, A.W., Menzel, R. (eds.), pp. 263–289. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1975Google Scholar
- Hamdorf, K., Paulsen, R., Schwemer, J.: Photoregeneration and sensitivity control of photoreceptors of invertebrates. In: Biochemistry and physiology of visual pigments. Langer, H. (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1973Google Scholar
- Harris, W.A.: Color vision inDrosophila. Thesis for Ph.D. at California Institute of Technology (1976)Google Scholar
- Harris, W.A., Ready, D.F., Lipson, E.D., Hudspeth, A.J., Stark, W.S.: Vitamin A deprivation andDrosophila photopigments. Nature (London)266, 648–650 (1977)Google Scholar
- Harris, W.A., Stark, W.S.: Hereditary retinal degeneration inDrosophila melanogaster: a mutant defect associated with the phototransduction process. J. Gen. Physiol.69, 261–291 (1977)Google Scholar
- Harris, W.A., Stark, W.S., Walker, J.A.: Genetic dissection of the photoreceptor system in the compound eye ofDrosophila melanogaster. J. Physiol. (London)256, 415–439 (1976)Google Scholar
- Hecht, S., Shlaer, S., Pirenne, M.H.: Energy, quanta, and vision. J. Gen. Physiol.25, 819–840 (1942)Google Scholar
- Hochstein, S., Minke, B., Hillman, P., Knight, B.W.: The kinetics of visual pigment systems I. Mathematical analysis. Biol. Cybern.30, 23–32 (1978)Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, C., Langer, H.: Die spektrale Augenempfindlichkeit der Mutante “chalky” vonCalliphora erythrocephala. Naturwissenschaften48, 105 (1961)Google Scholar
- Horridge, G.A., Mimura, K., Hardie, R.C.: Fly photoreceptors III. Angular sensitivity as a function of wavelength and the limits of resolution. Proc. R. Soc. (London) Ser. B194, 151–177 (1976)Google Scholar
- Kirschfeld, K.: The function of photostable pigments in fly photoreceptors. Biophys. Struct. Mech.5, 177–128 (1979)Google Scholar
- Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N.: Photostable pigments within the membrane of photoreceptors and their possible role. Biophys. Struct. Mech.3, 191–194 (1977)Google Scholar
- Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N., Minke, B.: Evidence for a sensitizing pigment in fly photoreceptors. Nature (London)269, 386–390 (1977)Google Scholar
- Kirschfeld, K., Feiler, R., Minke, B.: The kinetics of formation of metarhodopsin in intact photoreceptors of the fly. Z. Naturforsch., Teil C33, 1009–1010 (1978)Google Scholar
- Lindsley, D.L., Grell, E.H.: Genetic variations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1968Google Scholar
- Lo, M.-V.C.: Darkening of deep pseudopupil inDrosophila: An optical indication of inactivation of the peripheral photoreceptors. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University (1977)Google Scholar
- Lo, M.-V.C., Pak, W.L.: Desensitization of peripheral photoreceptors shown by blue-induced decrease in transmittance ofDrosophila rhabdomeres. Nature (London)273, 772–774 (1978)Google Scholar
- Minke, B., Kirschfeld, K.: The contribution of a sensitizing pigment to the photosensitivity spectra of fly rhodopsin and metarhodopsin. J. Gen. Physiol.73, 517–540 (1979)Google Scholar
- Nickel, E., Menzel, R.: Insect UV- and green-photoreceptor membranes studied by the freeze-fracture technique. Cell Tissue Res.175, 357–368 (1976)Google Scholar
- Ostroy, S.E.: Characteristics ofDrosophila rhodopsin in wild-type andnorpA vision transduction mutants. J. Gen. Physiol.72, 717–732 (1978)Google Scholar
- Ostroy, S.E., Wilson, M., Pak, W.L.:Drosophila rhodopsin: photochemistry extraction and differences in thenorpA p12 phototransduction mutant. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.59, 960–966 (1974)Google Scholar
- Pak, W.L., Lidington, K.J.: Fast electrical potential from a long lived, long wavelength photoproduct of fly visual pigment. J. Gen. Physiol.63, 740–756 (1974)Google Scholar
- Razmjoo, S., Hamdorf, K.: Visual sensitivity and the variation of total photopigment content in the blowfly photoreceptor membrane. J. Comp. Physiol.105, 279–286 (1976)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S.: Sensitivity and adaptation in R7, an ultraviolet photoreceptor, in theDrosophila retina. J. Comp. Physiol.115, 47–49 (1977)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S.: Spectral selectivity of visual response alterations mediated by interconversions of native and intermediate photopigments inDrosophila. J. Comp. Physiol.96, 343–356 (1975)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S., Zitzmann, W.G.: Isolation of adaptation mechanisms and photopigment spectra by vitamin A deprivation inDrosophila. J. Comp. Physiol.105, 15–27 (1976)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S., Ivanyshyn, A., Hu, K.G.: Spectral sensitivities and photopigments in adaptation of fly visual receptors. Naturwissenschaften63, 513–518 (1976)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S., Ivanyshyn, A.M., Greenberg, R.M.: Sensitivity and photopigments of R1–6, a two peaked photoreceptor, inDrosophila, Calliphora, andMusca. J. Comp. Physiol.121, 289–305 (1977)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S., Frayer, K.L., Johnson, M.A.: Photopigment and receptor properties inDrosophila compound eye and ocellar receptors. Biophys. Struct. Mech.5, 197–209 (1979a)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S., Kruizinga, B., Stavenga, D.G.: Rhabdomere fluorescence and UV vision in fly R1–6 receptors. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. (Suppl.) p. 177 (Abstract) (1979b)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S., Stavenga, D.G., Kruizinga, B.: Fly photoreceptor fluorescence is related to UV sensitivity. Nature (London)270, 581–583 (1979c)Google Scholar
- Stark, W.S., Sullivan, G., Hansen, K., Garfinkel, F.: Microspectrophotometry of dark revovery and bleaching ofDrosophila photopigments. In: AAAS 1980 Americal Association for the Advancement of Science (Abstract) (1980)Google Scholar
- Stavenga, D.G.: Derivation of photochrome absorption spectra from absorbance difference measurements. Photochem. Photobiol.21, 105–110 (1975)Google Scholar
- Stavenga, D.G.: Fly visual pigments difference in visual pigments of blowfly and dronefly peripheral retinula cells. J. Comp. Physiol.111, 137–152 (1976)Google Scholar
- Stavenga, D.G.: Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/6A. Autrum, H. (ed.), pp. 358–439. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1979Google Scholar
- Stavenga, D.G., Zantema, A., Kuiper, J.W.: Rhodopsin processes and the function of the pupil mechanism in flies. In: Biochemistry and physiology of visual pigments. Langer, H. (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1973Google Scholar
- Stavenga, D.G., Flokstra, J.H., Kuiper, J.W.: Photopigment conversions expressed in the pupil mechanism of blowfly visual sense cells. Nature (London)253, 740–742 (1975)Google Scholar
- Tan, K.E.W.P.: Vision in the ultraviolet. Ph. D. Thesis, Utrecht (1971)Google Scholar
- Tsukahara, Y., Horridge, G.A.: Visual pigment spectra from sensitivity of single dronefly retinula cells. J. Comp. Physiol.114, 233–251 (1977)Google Scholar
- White, R.H.: Insect visual pigments. Adv. Insect Physiol.13, 35–67 (1978)Google Scholar
- Wijngaard, W., Stavenga, D.G.: On optical crosstalk between fly rhabdomeres. Biol. Cybern.18, 61–67 (1975)Google Scholar
- Wright, R., Cosens, D.: Blue-adaptation and orange-adaptation in white-eyedDrosophila: Evidence that the prolonged after potential is correlated with the amount of M580 in R1–6. J. Comp. Physiol.113, 105–127 (1977)Google Scholar
- Zuidervaart, H., Stavenga, D.G., Stark, W.S., Bernard, G.D.: Pupillary responses revealing receptor characteristics in wild-type and mutantDrosophila. In: Neuroscience abstracts (Society for Neuroscience Ninth Annual Meeting), 2755 (Abstract) (1979)Google Scholar