Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 140, Issue 4, pp 275–286 | Cite as

Microspectrophotometry ofDrosophila visual pigments: Determinations of conversion efficiency in R1–6 receptors

  • William S. Stark
  • Mary A. Johnson
Article

Summary

We used microspectrophotometry, together with some associated electrophysiological measurements, to characterize the photopigments of R1–6 receptors in living, white-eyedDrosophila. Measurements were from the deep pseudopupil, an optical visualization of photopigment-containing rhabdomeres. Transmission changes associated with photointerconversion of rhodopsin (R480) and its stable metarhodopsin (M570) are easily seen (Fig. 1). Such transmission changes were measured to produce a difference specrum (Fig. 2); the isosbestic wavelength is about 502 nm. A photoequilibrium spectrum (Fig. 3), analyzed together with sensitivity data (Fig. 4a), was used to determine the fraction of M570 in photoequilibria established with various monochromatic wavelengths. From this, the quantum efficiency for M570 to R480 conversion relative to R480 to M570 efficiency was determined to be about 0.71. No dark regeneration of M570 to R480 occurred within a period of 60min (Fig. 4a, b).

The extent of conversion related to incident energy was estimated as a function of wavelength (Figs. 5 and 6). These experiments yielded the photosensitivity spectrum of the visual pigment (Fig. 6). Assuming that the absorption spectrum of rhodopsin (R480) is the same as the sensitivity spectrum as determined by electrophysiology, this photosensitivity spectrum was used to derive the spectrum of metarhodopsin (M570) (Fig. 7). The maximal extinction of M570 is about 1.43 times the maximal extinction of R480. The spectra of both states of the photopigment fit the Ebrey-Honig nomogram in the long wavelength band. Both of the photosensitivity spectra, measured in the living eye, associated with R480 and M570 respectively have a major UV maximum.

Keywords

Absorption Spectrum Conversion Efficiency Quantum Efficiency Incident Energy Dark Regeneration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

ERG

electroretinogram

M orM570

metarhodopsin of R1–6

NA

numerical aperture

PDA

prolonged depolarizing afterpotential

R orR480

rhodopsin of R1–6

R1–6

retinula cells with peripheral rhabdomeres

R7 andR8

retinula cells with central rhabdomeres

SE

standard error

UV

ultraviolet

A, a, c, D, e, f, I, l. m, Q, S, t, α, γ, λ., Φ

symbols used in quantitative treatment, see Methods

bw, cn, norpA, sev, w

Drosophila mutants, see Methods

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burkhardt, D.: Spectral sensitivity and other response characteristics of single cells in the arthropod eye. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.16, 86–109 (1962)Google Scholar
  2. Burkhardt, D.: On the vision of insects. J. Comp. Physiol.120, 33–50 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. Dartnall, H.J.A.: The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. Br. Med. Bull.9, 24–30 (1953)Google Scholar
  4. Dartnall, H.J.A.: Photosensitivity. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/I. Dartnall, H.J.A. (ed.), pp. 122–145. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972Google Scholar
  5. Dartnall, H.J.A., Goodeve, C.F., Lythgoe, R.J.: The quantitative analysis of the photochemical bleaching of visual purple solutions in monochromatic light. Proc. R. Soc. (London) Ser. A156, 158–170 (1936)Google Scholar
  6. Doane, W.W.: Drosophila. In: Methods in developmental biology. Wilt, F.H., Wessells, N.K. (eds.). New York: Crowell 1967Google Scholar
  7. Ebrey, T.G., Honig, B.: New wavelength dependent visual pigment nomograms. Vision Res.17, 147–151 (1977)Google Scholar
  8. Eguchi, E., Waterman, T.H.: Freeze-etch and histochemical evidence for cycling in crayfish photoreceptor membranes. Cell Tissue Res.169, 419–434 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. Fernandez, H.R., Nickel, E.E.: Ultrastructural and molecular characteristics of crayfish photoreceptor membranes. J. Cell Biol.69, 721–732 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Franceschini, N.: Sampling of the visual environment by the compound eye of the fly: Fundamentals and applications. In: Photoreceptor optics. Synder, A.W., Menzel, R. (eds.), pp. 98–125. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1975Google Scholar
  11. Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K.: Les phénomènes de pseudopupille dans l'oeil composé deDrosophila. Kybernetik9, 159–182 (1971)Google Scholar
  12. Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K.: Le contrôle automatique du flux lumineaux dans l'oeil composé des Diptères: Propriétés spectrales, statiques et dynamiques du mécanisme. Biol. Cybern.21, 181–203 (1976)Google Scholar
  13. Hagins, W.A.: The visual process: Excitatory processes in primary receptor cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng.1, 131–158 (1972)Google Scholar
  14. Hamdorf, K.: The physiology of invertebrate visual pigments. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/6A. Autrum, H. (ed.), pp. 145–224. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1979Google Scholar
  15. Hamdorf, K., Rosner, G.: Adaptation und Photoregeneration im Fliegenauge. J. Comp. Physiol.86, 281–292 (1973)Google Scholar
  16. Hamdorf, K., Schwemer, J.: Photoregeneration and the adaptation process in insect photoreceptors. In: Photoreceptor optics. Snyder, A.W., Menzel, R. (eds.), pp. 263–289. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1975Google Scholar
  17. Hamdorf, K., Paulsen, R., Schwemer, J.: Photoregeneration and sensitivity control of photoreceptors of invertebrates. In: Biochemistry and physiology of visual pigments. Langer, H. (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1973Google Scholar
  18. Harris, W.A.: Color vision inDrosophila. Thesis for Ph.D. at California Institute of Technology (1976)Google Scholar
  19. Harris, W.A., Ready, D.F., Lipson, E.D., Hudspeth, A.J., Stark, W.S.: Vitamin A deprivation andDrosophila photopigments. Nature (London)266, 648–650 (1977)Google Scholar
  20. Harris, W.A., Stark, W.S.: Hereditary retinal degeneration inDrosophila melanogaster: a mutant defect associated with the phototransduction process. J. Gen. Physiol.69, 261–291 (1977)Google Scholar
  21. Harris, W.A., Stark, W.S., Walker, J.A.: Genetic dissection of the photoreceptor system in the compound eye ofDrosophila melanogaster. J. Physiol. (London)256, 415–439 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Hecht, S., Shlaer, S., Pirenne, M.H.: Energy, quanta, and vision. J. Gen. Physiol.25, 819–840 (1942)Google Scholar
  23. Hochstein, S., Minke, B., Hillman, P., Knight, B.W.: The kinetics of visual pigment systems I. Mathematical analysis. Biol. Cybern.30, 23–32 (1978)Google Scholar
  24. Hoffmann, C., Langer, H.: Die spektrale Augenempfindlichkeit der Mutante “chalky” vonCalliphora erythrocephala. Naturwissenschaften48, 105 (1961)Google Scholar
  25. Horridge, G.A., Mimura, K., Hardie, R.C.: Fly photoreceptors III. Angular sensitivity as a function of wavelength and the limits of resolution. Proc. R. Soc. (London) Ser. B194, 151–177 (1976)Google Scholar
  26. Kirschfeld, K.: The function of photostable pigments in fly photoreceptors. Biophys. Struct. Mech.5, 177–128 (1979)Google Scholar
  27. Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N.: Photostable pigments within the membrane of photoreceptors and their possible role. Biophys. Struct. Mech.3, 191–194 (1977)Google Scholar
  28. Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N., Minke, B.: Evidence for a sensitizing pigment in fly photoreceptors. Nature (London)269, 386–390 (1977)Google Scholar
  29. Kirschfeld, K., Feiler, R., Minke, B.: The kinetics of formation of metarhodopsin in intact photoreceptors of the fly. Z. Naturforsch., Teil C33, 1009–1010 (1978)Google Scholar
  30. Lindsley, D.L., Grell, E.H.: Genetic variations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1968Google Scholar
  31. Lo, M.-V.C.: Darkening of deep pseudopupil inDrosophila: An optical indication of inactivation of the peripheral photoreceptors. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University (1977)Google Scholar
  32. Lo, M.-V.C., Pak, W.L.: Desensitization of peripheral photoreceptors shown by blue-induced decrease in transmittance ofDrosophila rhabdomeres. Nature (London)273, 772–774 (1978)Google Scholar
  33. Minke, B., Kirschfeld, K.: The contribution of a sensitizing pigment to the photosensitivity spectra of fly rhodopsin and metarhodopsin. J. Gen. Physiol.73, 517–540 (1979)Google Scholar
  34. Nickel, E., Menzel, R.: Insect UV- and green-photoreceptor membranes studied by the freeze-fracture technique. Cell Tissue Res.175, 357–368 (1976)Google Scholar
  35. Ostroy, S.E.: Characteristics ofDrosophila rhodopsin in wild-type andnorpA vision transduction mutants. J. Gen. Physiol.72, 717–732 (1978)Google Scholar
  36. Ostroy, S.E., Wilson, M., Pak, W.L.:Drosophila rhodopsin: photochemistry extraction and differences in thenorpA p12 phototransduction mutant. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.59, 960–966 (1974)Google Scholar
  37. Pak, W.L., Lidington, K.J.: Fast electrical potential from a long lived, long wavelength photoproduct of fly visual pigment. J. Gen. Physiol.63, 740–756 (1974)Google Scholar
  38. Razmjoo, S., Hamdorf, K.: Visual sensitivity and the variation of total photopigment content in the blowfly photoreceptor membrane. J. Comp. Physiol.105, 279–286 (1976)Google Scholar
  39. Stark, W.S.: Sensitivity and adaptation in R7, an ultraviolet photoreceptor, in theDrosophila retina. J. Comp. Physiol.115, 47–49 (1977)Google Scholar
  40. Stark, W.S.: Spectral selectivity of visual response alterations mediated by interconversions of native and intermediate photopigments inDrosophila. J. Comp. Physiol.96, 343–356 (1975)Google Scholar
  41. Stark, W.S., Zitzmann, W.G.: Isolation of adaptation mechanisms and photopigment spectra by vitamin A deprivation inDrosophila. J. Comp. Physiol.105, 15–27 (1976)Google Scholar
  42. Stark, W.S., Ivanyshyn, A., Hu, K.G.: Spectral sensitivities and photopigments in adaptation of fly visual receptors. Naturwissenschaften63, 513–518 (1976)Google Scholar
  43. Stark, W.S., Ivanyshyn, A.M., Greenberg, R.M.: Sensitivity and photopigments of R1–6, a two peaked photoreceptor, inDrosophila, Calliphora, andMusca. J. Comp. Physiol.121, 289–305 (1977)Google Scholar
  44. Stark, W.S., Frayer, K.L., Johnson, M.A.: Photopigment and receptor properties inDrosophila compound eye and ocellar receptors. Biophys. Struct. Mech.5, 197–209 (1979a)Google Scholar
  45. Stark, W.S., Kruizinga, B., Stavenga, D.G.: Rhabdomere fluorescence and UV vision in fly R1–6 receptors. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. (Suppl.) p. 177 (Abstract) (1979b)Google Scholar
  46. Stark, W.S., Stavenga, D.G., Kruizinga, B.: Fly photoreceptor fluorescence is related to UV sensitivity. Nature (London)270, 581–583 (1979c)Google Scholar
  47. Stark, W.S., Sullivan, G., Hansen, K., Garfinkel, F.: Microspectrophotometry of dark revovery and bleaching ofDrosophila photopigments. In: AAAS 1980 Americal Association for the Advancement of Science (Abstract) (1980)Google Scholar
  48. Stavenga, D.G.: Derivation of photochrome absorption spectra from absorbance difference measurements. Photochem. Photobiol.21, 105–110 (1975)Google Scholar
  49. Stavenga, D.G.: Fly visual pigments difference in visual pigments of blowfly and dronefly peripheral retinula cells. J. Comp. Physiol.111, 137–152 (1976)Google Scholar
  50. Stavenga, D.G.: Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/6A. Autrum, H. (ed.), pp. 358–439. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1979Google Scholar
  51. Stavenga, D.G., Zantema, A., Kuiper, J.W.: Rhodopsin processes and the function of the pupil mechanism in flies. In: Biochemistry and physiology of visual pigments. Langer, H. (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1973Google Scholar
  52. Stavenga, D.G., Flokstra, J.H., Kuiper, J.W.: Photopigment conversions expressed in the pupil mechanism of blowfly visual sense cells. Nature (London)253, 740–742 (1975)Google Scholar
  53. Tan, K.E.W.P.: Vision in the ultraviolet. Ph. D. Thesis, Utrecht (1971)Google Scholar
  54. Tsukahara, Y., Horridge, G.A.: Visual pigment spectra from sensitivity of single dronefly retinula cells. J. Comp. Physiol.114, 233–251 (1977)Google Scholar
  55. White, R.H.: Insect visual pigments. Adv. Insect Physiol.13, 35–67 (1978)Google Scholar
  56. Wijngaard, W., Stavenga, D.G.: On optical crosstalk between fly rhabdomeres. Biol. Cybern.18, 61–67 (1975)Google Scholar
  57. Wright, R., Cosens, D.: Blue-adaptation and orange-adaptation in white-eyedDrosophila: Evidence that the prolonged after potential is correlated with the amount of M580 in R1–6. J. Comp. Physiol.113, 105–127 (1977)Google Scholar
  58. Zuidervaart, H., Stavenga, D.G., Stark, W.S., Bernard, G.D.: Pupillary responses revealing receptor characteristics in wild-type and mutantDrosophila. In: Neuroscience abstracts (Society for Neuroscience Ninth Annual Meeting), 2755 (Abstract) (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • William S. Stark
    • 1
  • Mary A. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Laboratory of Physiological Optics, Wilmer Ophthalmological InstituteThe Johns Hopkins University, School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations