Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 158, Issue 5, pp 723–728 | Cite as

Elasmobranch eye motor dynamics characterised using pseudorandom stimulus

  • M. G. Paulin
  • J. C. Montgomery
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    A pseudorandom binary sequence electrical pulse rate stimulus was delivered to the abducens nerve of an elasmobranch preparation. Ipsilateral eye movements were recorded using a position-sensitive photodiode to measure the position of a reflective patch attached to the fish's eye.

     
  2. 2.

    Eye position data was cross-correlated with the stimulus pattern, and exponential decay curves were fitted to the cross-correlograms to estimate the time constant of a linear first order low-pass filter model. The cross-correlograms were transformed into the frequency domain using a Digital Fourier Transform, and Bode plots of eye dynamics were plotted.

     
  3. 3.

    Eye motor plant dynamics in the elasmobranchCephaloscyllium isabella can be accurately characterised by a linear first order low-pass filter model with a corner frequency of 0.73±0.10 Hz. Non-minimum phase lag reaches 90‡ at about 4 Hz, indicating a time delay of some 50–60 ms.

     
  4. 4.

    Integration of the canal signal is not required for producing compensatory eye movements above the characteristic frequency of the eye motor plant. However, the canal signal may be integrated to ensure that the vestibulo-ocular reflex is compensatory at lower frequencies. Substantial phase compensation or prediction is required for effective control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

     

Abbreviations

PRBS

pseudorandom lineary sequence

UIR

unit impulse response

VOR

vestibulo-ocular reflex

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caceci MS, Cacheris WP (1984) Fitting curves to data: the simplex algorithm. Byte 9:340–362Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter RHS (1977) Movements of the eyes. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Fujita M (1982a) Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum. Biol Cybern 45:195–206Google Scholar
  4. Fujita M (1982b) Simulation of adaptive modification of vestibulo-ocular reflex with an adaptive filter model of the cerebellum. Biol Cybern 45:207–214Google Scholar
  5. Galiana HL, Outerbridge JS (1984) A bilateral model for central neural pathways in vestibulo-ocular reflex. J Neurophysiol 51:210–241Google Scholar
  6. Gauthier GM, Piron J, Roll J, Marchetti E, Martin B (1984) High frequency vestibulo-ocular reflex activation through forced head rotation in man. Aviat Space Environ Med 55(1):1–7Google Scholar
  7. Harris AJ (1965) Eye movement dynamics of the dogfishSqualus acanthias L. J Exp Biol 43:107–130Google Scholar
  8. Helversen ON von, Elsner N (1977) The stridulatory movements of acridid grasshoppers recorded with an opto-electronic device. J Comp Physiol 122:53–64Google Scholar
  9. Ito M (1984) The cerebellum and neural control. Raven, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones GM, Spells KE (1963) A theoretical and comparative study of the functional dependence of the semicircular canal upon its physical dimensions. Proc R Soc Lond B 157:403–419Google Scholar
  11. Keller EL (1978) Gain of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in monkey at high rotational frequencies. Vision Res 18:311–319Google Scholar
  12. Lowenstein O (1972) Physiology of the vestibular receptors. In: Brodal A, Pompeiano O (eds) Basic aspects of central vestibular mechanisms. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 19–30Google Scholar
  13. Marmarelis PZ, Marmarelis VZ (1978) Analysis of physiological systems: The white noise approach. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Montgomery JC (1980) Dogfish horizontal canal system: Responses of primary afferent, vestibular and cerebellar neurons to rotational stimulation. Neurosci 5(10):1761–1769Google Scholar
  15. Montgomery JC (1983) Eye movement dynamics in the dogfish. J Exp Biol 105:297–303Google Scholar
  16. O'Leary DP (1979) Afferent response differences in anterior versus lateral semicircular canal in the isolated guitarfish labyrinth. Proc Midwinger Meeting Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p 71Google Scholar
  17. O'Leary DP, Honrubia V (1976) Analysis of afferent responses from the isolated semicircular canal of the guitarfish using rotational acceleration white noise input. II: Estimation of linear system parameters and gain and phase spectra. J Neurophysiol 39:645–659Google Scholar
  18. Pellionisz A, Llinás R (1979) Brain modeling by tensor network theory and computer simulation. The cerebellum: Distributed processor for predictive coordination. Neuroscience 4:323–348Google Scholar
  19. Rabiner LR, Schafer RW, Rader CM (1969) The chirp z-transform algorithm. IEEE Trans AU-17:86–92Google Scholar
  20. Robinson DA (1981) The use of control systems analysis in the neurophysiology of eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 4:463–503Google Scholar
  21. Tomko DL, Peterka RJ, Schor RH, O'Leary DP (1981) Response dynamics of horizontal canal afferents in barbiturate anesthetised cats. J Neurophysiol 45:376–396Google Scholar
  22. Winterson BJ, Collewijn H, Steinman RM (1979) Compensatory eye movements in the rabbit. Vision Res 19:1155–1159Google Scholar
  23. Zuber BL (1968) Eye movement dynamics in the cat: The final motor pathway. Exp Neurol 20:255–260Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Paulin
    • 1
  • J. C. Montgomery
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations