Neuroradiology

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 235–240 | Cite as

Radicular avulsion resulting from spinal injury: assessment of diagnostic modalities

  • E. Volle
  • J. Assheuer
  • J. P. Hedde
  • R. Gustorf-Aeckerle
Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Summary

The diagnostic utility of imaging techniques in injuries to the intramedullary and subarachnoid portions of the brachial plexus, with possibly complete avulsion of one or more nerve roots from the spinal cord and extramedullary meningocoele was compared in 18 patients studied by unenhanced computed tomography (CT), cervical myelography, myelographic CT (MCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Emphasis was placed on the lesions of the subarachnoid roots. CM was the only diagnostic modality to show avulsion of 18 nerve roots and their levels in 8 patients (100% = gold standard), and to verify 2 incomplete avulsions. MCT reliably revealed 8 of 18 (45%) and MRI 1 out of 18 (6%) avulsions. Myelography with MCT showed intact subarachnoid nerve roots in 10 additional patients. MRI and MCT (16 out of 16=100%) were superior to myelography (14/16=88%) for demonstrating 16 traumatic meningocoeles in 8 patients; follow-up MRI (6–24 months) showed no increase in their size. We recommend a subsequent CT to role out fracture to the spinal column; MRI should provide significant information concerning oedema or haemorrhage in the spinal cord. Myelography with segmental MCT is performed to differentiate pre- from post-ganglionic lesions. data which are essential for deciding whether exploration of the plexus or a motor substitution operation is indicated.

Key words

Spinal cord, injuries Spinal cord, MR studies Nerve root avulsion Contrast media Cervical myelography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alnot JY (1987) Traumatic paralysis of the brachial plexus: preoperative problems and therapeutic indications. In: Terzis JK (ed) Microreconstruction of nerve injuries. Saunders, Philadelphia; pp 325–345Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birch R (1987) Brachial plexus injuries. Curr Orthop 1:316–323Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millesi H (1987) Brachial plexus injuries: management and results. In: Terzis JK (ed) Microreconstruction of nerve injuries. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 347–360Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor PE (1962) Traumatic intradural avulsion of the nerve roots of the brachial plexus. Brain 85:579–602Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphey F, Hartung W, Kirklin JW (1947) Myelographic demonstration of avulsing injury of the brachial plexus. Am J Roentgenol 58:102–105Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yeoman PM (1968) Cervical myelography in traction injuries of the brachial plexus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 50:253–260Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frot B, Filipe G, Olivier H, Alnot JY, Duparc J (1973) Interêt de la myelographie cervicale à contraste positif dans l'exploration des lésions traumatiques du plexus brachial chez l'adulte. Ann Radiol 16:715–721Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wiedenmann O (1963) Neurologische Störungen als Folge von Ausrißverletzungen des Plexus brachialis im Vergleich zu den Befunden des positiven Myelogramms. Z Orthop 97:67–78Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Piepgras U, Jelasic F, Kammerer V, Traupe H (1975) Radiologische Befunde bei zervikalen Wurzelausrissen. Radiologe 15: 317–322Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neuenschwander S, Brauner M, Gilbert A, Faure C (1980) La myelographie cervicale à la metrizamide dans les paralysies obstétricales du plexus brachial. Ann Radiol 23:93–98Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petras AF, Sobel DF, Mani JR, Lucas PR (1985) CT myelography in cervical root avulsion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:275–279Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marshall RW, De Silva RDD (1986) Computerized axial tomography in traction injuries of the brachial plexus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68:734–738Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cobby MJD, Leslie IJ, Watt I (1988) Cervical myelography of nerve root avulsion injuries using water-soluble contrast media. Br J Radiol 61:673–678Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Armington WG, Harnsberger HR, Osborn AG, Seay AR (1987) Radiographic evaluation of brachial plexopathy. AJNR 8:361–367Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta RK, Mehta VS, Banerji AK, Jain RK (1989) MR evaluation of brachial plexus injuries. Neuroradiology 31:377–381Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Volle E, Hedde JP, Gormanns R (1991) Die direkte zervikale Myelographie mit Iotrolan 300. RÖFO 154:87–91Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sander B, Henkes H, Lutz N, Felix R (1989) Der Einfluß von Röntgenkontrastmitteln bei der Magnetresonanztomographie des Spinalkanals. Röntgen-Bl 42:343–345Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Amundsen P, Skalpe IO (1975) Cervical myelography with a water-soluble contrast medium (metrizamide). Neuroradiology 8:209–212Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leo JS, Bergeron T, Kricheff II, Benjamin MV (1978) Metrizamide myelography for cervical spinal cord injuries. Radiology 129:707–711Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raininko R, Sonningen P (1987) Dorsal CSF space at CI-CII level. Neuroradiology 29:73–75Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dawson P, Howell M (1986) The non-ionic dimers: a new class of contrast agents. Br J Radiol 59:987–991Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harwood-Nash DCF, Petterson H (1982) CT myelography of the spine and cord. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 12–14Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verstraete KLA, Martens F, Smeets P, Vandekerckhove T, Meire D, Parizel PM, Van de Velde E, Calliaux L (1989) Traumatic lumbosacral nerve root meningoceles. Neuroradiology 31:425–429Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stohr M, Riffel B, Buettner US (1981) Somatosensibel evozierte Potentiale in der Diagnostik von Armplexusläsionen. EEG EMG 12:195–197Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hashimoto T, Mitomo M, Hirabuki N, Miura T, Kawai R, Nakamura H, Kawai H, Ono K, Kozuka T (1991) Nerve root avulsion of birth palsy: comparison of myelography with CT myelography and somatosensory evoked potentials. Radiology 178:841–845Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flanders AE, Schaefer DM, Doan AT, Mishkin MM, Gonzalez CF, Northrup BE (1990) Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 177:25–33Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Enzmann DR, De LaPaz R, Rubin JB (1990) Magnetic resonance of the spine, 1st edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 250–259Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Penfield W (1949) Late spinal paralysis after avulsion of the brachial plexus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 31:40–41Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robertson HJ, Smith RD (1990) Cervical myelography: survey of modes of practice and major complications. Radiology 174: 79–83Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Skalpe IO (1990) Cervical myelography (letter to the editor). Radiology 177:590–591Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Volle
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • J. Assheuer
    • 3
  • J. P. Hedde
    • 2
  • R. Gustorf-Aeckerle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neuroradiology, Katharinenhospital StuttgartUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Radiological Clinic Cologne-Merheim HospitalCologne
  3. 3.MRI UnitCologne
  4. 4.Radiologische PraxisKemptenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations