Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 346, Issue 3, pp 251–262 | Cite as

Length-dependent autogenetic inhibition of extensor γ-motoneurones in the decerebrate cat

  • C. Fromm
  • J. Haase
  • J. Noth
Article

Summary

The effects of stretching the triceps surae muscle on the resting discharge of functionally isolated and identified γ-efferents in the medial gastrocnemius nerve were studied in intercollicular decerebrate cats. Extension of the muscle decreases the activity of 9 out of 25 γ-motoneurones. This inhibition becomes apparent at about 8 mm muscle length and increases with increasing extension. Only those γ-efferents exhibiting this length-dependent inhibition are found to be inhibited by repetitive antidromic stimulation of the ventral root or the homonymous muscle nerve. We suggest that inhibition of fusimotor neurones by muscle stretch is at least partly mediated by the recurrent collaterals of the α-motoneurones activated by the stretch. 11 γ-motoneurones were predominantly excited by muscle stretch applied to the detached Achilles tendon as well as by squeezing the tendon. Nociceptors within the tendon or surrounding fascia are probably responsible.

Key words

Extensor γ-Motoneurones Autogenetic Inhibition Recurrent Inhibition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, M. C., Lawrence, D. G., Matthews, P. B. C.: Antidromic inhibition of presumed fusimotor neurones by repetitive stimulation of the ventral root in the decerebrate cat. Experientia (Basel)24, 1210–1211 (1968a)Google Scholar
  2. Brown, M. C., Lawrence, D. G., Matthews, P. B. C.: Reflex inhibition by Ia afferent input of spontaneously discharging motoneurones in the decerebrate cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.)198, 5–7P (1968b)Google Scholar
  3. Diete-Spiff, K., Pascoe, J. E.: The spindle motor nerves to the gastrocnemius muscle of the rabbit. J. Physiol. (Lond.)149, 120–134 (1959)Google Scholar
  4. Eccles, J. C., Eccles, R. M., Iggo, A., Lundberg, A.: Electrophysiological studies on gamma motoneurones. Acta physiol. scand.50, 32–40 (1960)Google Scholar
  5. Eldred, E., Granit, R., Merton, P. A.: Supraspinal control of the muscle spindles and its significance. J. Physiol. (Lond.)122, 498–523 (1953)Google Scholar
  6. Ellaway, P. H.: Antidromic inhibition of fusimotor neurones. J. Physiol. (Lond.)198, 39–40 P (1968)Google Scholar
  7. Ellaway, P. H.: Recurrent inhibition of fusimotor neurones exhibiting background discharges in the decerebrate and the spinal cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.)216, 419–439 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. Fromm, Chr., Haase, J.: Positionsempfindlichkeit und fusimotorische Aktivierung prätibialer Muskelspindelendigungen vor und nach Deafferentierung. Pflügers Arch.321, 242–252 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. Granit, R.: Charles Scott Sherrington. An Appraisal. London: Nelson 1966Google Scholar
  10. Granit, R., Pascoe, J. E., Steg, G.: The behaviour of tonic α and γ motoneurones during stimulation of recurrent collaterales. J. Physiol. (Lond.)138, 381–400 (1957)Google Scholar
  11. Grillner, S.: The influence of Dopa on the static and the dynamic fusimotor activity to the triceps surae of the spinal cat. Acta physiol. scand.77, 490–509 (1969a)Google Scholar
  12. Grillner, S., Supraspinal and segmental control of static and dynamic γ-motoneurones in the cat. Acta physiol. scand., Suppl.327, 1–34 (1969b)Google Scholar
  13. Grillner, S., Hongo, T., Lund, S.: Descending monosynaptic and reflex control of γ-motoneurones. Acta physiol. scand.75, 592–613 (1969)Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, C. C.: The reflex activity of mammalian small-nerve fibres. J. Physiol. (Lond.)115, 456–469 (1951)Google Scholar
  15. Hunt, C. C., Paintal, A. S.: Spinal reflex regulation of fusimotor neurones. J. Physiol. (Lond.)143, 195–212 (1958)Google Scholar
  16. Matthews, P. B. C.: Muscle spindles and their motor control. Physiol. Rev.44, 219–288 (1964)Google Scholar
  17. Noth, J.: Aktivitätsänderungen der Extensor-Fusimotoneurone der Katze infolge Reizung niedrigschwelliger Muskelafferenzen. Pflügers Arch.326, 231–239 (1971a)Google Scholar
  18. Noth, J.: Recurrente Hemmung der Extensor-Fusimotoneurone? Pflügers Arch.329, 23–33 (1971b)Google Scholar
  19. Pompeiano, O.: Alpha types of ‘release’ studied in tension-extension diagrams from cat's forelimb triceps muscle. Arch. ital. Biol.98, 92–117 (1960)Google Scholar
  20. Proske, U., Lewis, D. M.: The effects of muscle stretch and vibration on fusimotor activity in the lightly anaesthetised cat. Brain Res.46, 55–69 (1972)Google Scholar
  21. Voorhoeve, P. E., van Kanten, R. W.: Reflex behaviour of fusimotor neurones of the cat upon electrical stimulation of various afferent fibres. Acta physiol. pharmacol. neerl.10, 391–407 (1962)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Fromm
    • 1
  • J. Haase
    • 1
  • J. Noth
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiologisches Institut (Lehrstuhl II) der Universität DüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations