Histochemistry

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 89–98 | Cite as

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in chick limb bud during morphogenesis

  • H. Schmidt
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

In the chick embryo a cholinesterase activity appears in various organ anlagen which has been correlated with morphogenetic movements (Drews 1975). The cholinesterase activity is present in the mesenchyme of the limb bud during aggregation of the central chondrogenic core. In the present study binding of tritium labelled quinuclidinyl benzilate ((3H)QNB), a muscarinic antagonist, to homogenates of chick limb buds was investigated by a filtration assay. In the homogenate of limb buds at Stage 24 specific binding of (3H)QNB was demonstrated. Determination of binding constants and inhibition of binding by agonists and antagonists was studied at Stage 25/26. Specific binding was defined by the difference in binding in the absence and presence of atropine (1 μM). Specific binding of (3H)QNB reflected a muscarinic receptor. The Kd in two experiments was 0.11 nM and 0.16 nM, the binding capacity was 15.7 fmol (3H)QNB/mg protein and 12.0 fmol (3H)QNB/mg protein, respectively. Data on displacement of specific bound (3H)QNB by various nicotinic and muscarinic ligands confirmed the muscarinic nature of the receptor. Muscarinic ligands inhibited the (3H) QNB binding, whereas nicotinic ligands caused no inhibition at pharmacological concentrations. I conclude that a specific muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is part of the cholinergic system whose presence is indicated by cholinesterase activity in the chondrogenic core of the limb bud during morphogenesis.

Keywords

Tritium Atropine Specific Binding Muscarinic Receptor Chick Embryo 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albanus L (1970) Central and peripheral effects of anticholinergic compounds. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 28:305–326Google Scholar
  2. Birdsall NJM, Hulme EC (1976) Biochemical studies on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurochem 27:7–16Google Scholar
  3. Birdsall NJM, Burgen ASV, Hulme EC (1978) The binding of agonists to brain muscarinic receptors. Mol Pharmacol 14:723–736Google Scholar
  4. Cavey D, Vincent JP, Làzdunski M (1977) The muscarinic receptors of heart cell membranes. FEBS Lett 84:110–114Google Scholar
  5. Chang KJ, Jacobs S, Cuatrecasas P (1975) Quantitative aspects of hormone — receptor interactions of high affinity. Effect of receptor concentration and measurement of dissociation constants of labeled and unlabeled hormones. Biochim Biophys Acta 406:294–303Google Scholar
  6. Cuatrecasas P, Hollenberg MD (1976) Membrane receptors and hormone action. Adv Protein Chem 30:251–451Google Scholar
  7. Drews U (1975) Cholinesterase in embryonic development. Prog Histochem Cytochem Vol. 7/3. Gustav Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  8. Drews U, Drews U (1972) Cholinesterase in der Extremitättenentwicklung des Hühnchens: Die Phasen der Cholinesterase-Aktivität in der jungen Knospe und bei der Abgrenzung von Knorpel-und Muskelanlagen. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 169:70–86Google Scholar
  9. Drews U, Kussäther E, Usadel KH (1967) Histochemischer Nachweis der Cholinesterase in der Frühentwicklung der Hühnerkeimscheibe. Histochemie 8:65–89Google Scholar
  10. Fambrough D, Rash JE (1971) Development of acetylcholine sensitivity during myogenesis. Dev Biol 26:55–68Google Scholar
  11. Fields JZ, Roeske WR, Morkin E, Yamamura HI (1978) Cardiac muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Biochemical identification and characterization. J Biol Chem 253:3251–3258Google Scholar
  12. Fluck RA (1978) Acetylcholine and acetylcholinesterase activity in early embryos of the medakaOryzias latipes, a teleost. Dev Growth Differ 20:17–25Google Scholar
  13. Galper JB, Klein W, Catterall WA (1977) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in developing chick heart. J Biol Chem 252:8692–8699Google Scholar
  14. Gustafson T, Toneby M (1970) On the role of serotonin and acetylcholine in sea urchin embryogenesis. Exp Cell Res 62:102–117Google Scholar
  15. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92Google Scholar
  16. Heidmann T, Changeux J-P (1978) Structural and functional properties of the acetylcholine receptor protein in its purified and membrane — bound states. Annu Rev Biochem 47:317–357Google Scholar
  17. Heilbronn E, Bartfai T (1978) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Prog Neurobiol 11:171–188Google Scholar
  18. Hill AV (1909) The mode of action of nicotine and curarine determined by the form of the concentration curve and the method of temperature coefficients. J Physiol (Lond) 39:361–373Google Scholar
  19. Hulme EC, Birdsall NJM, Burgen ASV, Mehta P (1978) The binding of antagonists to brain muscarinic receptors. Mol Pharmacol 14:737–750Google Scholar
  20. Janssen PAJ, Niemegeers CJE, Schellekens KHL, Demoen P, Lenaerts FM, Van Nueten JM, Van Wijngaarden I, Brugmans J (1971) Benzetimide and its optical isomers. Arzneim-Forsch 21:1365–1373Google Scholar
  21. Kocher-Becker U, Drews U, Drews U (1975) Histochemischer Nachweis der Cholinesterase-Aktivität während der Gastrulation des Seeigels. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 178:157–165Google Scholar
  22. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  23. Meyerhöffer A (1972) Absolute configuration of 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate and the behavioral effect in the dog of the optical isomers. J Med Chem 15:994–995Google Scholar
  24. Ozaki H (1976) Molecular properties and differentiation of acetylcholinesterase in sea urchin embryos. Dev Growth Differ 18:245–257Google Scholar
  25. Penner PL (1977) Acetylcholinesterase and cell movement in the epiblast of the primitive streak chick embryo. Doctoral thesis. New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Sastre A, Gray DB, Lane M-A (1977) Muscarinic cholinergic binding sites in the developing avian heart. Dev Biol 55:201–205Google Scholar
  27. Scatchard G (1949) The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Sci 51:660–672Google Scholar
  28. Schröder CH (1980), Characterization of embryonic cholinesterase in chick limb bud by colorimetry and disk electrophoresis. Histochemistry 69:243–253Google Scholar
  29. Shainberg A, Brik H (1978) The appearance of acetylcholine receptors triggered by fusion of myoblasts in vitro. FEBS Lett 88:327–331Google Scholar
  30. Sugiyama H, Daniels MP, Nirenberg M (1977) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor of the developing retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5524–5528Google Scholar
  31. Wastek GJ, Yamamura HI (1978) Biochemical characterization of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor in human brain: Alterations in Huntington's disease. Mol Pharmacol 14:768–780Google Scholar
  32. Yamamura HI, Snyder SH (1974a) Muscarinic cholinergic binding in rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:1725–1729Google Scholar
  33. Yamamura HI, Snyder SH (1974b) Muscarinic cholinergic binding in the longitudinal muscle of the guinea pig ileum with (3H) quinuclidinyl benzilate. Mol Pharmacol 10:861–867Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Anatomisches InstitutUniversität TübingenTübingenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations