Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Light diffraction patterns and sarcomere length variation in striated muscle fibers ofLimulus

  • 47 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

Summary

Light diffraction patterns produced byLimulus striated muscle fibers were examined. Segments of fibers were glycerinated, fixed or bathed in relaxing solution. Profiles of the intensity of a diffracted order vs. the angle of incidence of the laser beam often exhibited narrow peaks with the fiber at rest length. The incident angles at which the intensity of left and right orders is greatest are used to calculate the sarcomere length, supporting the notion that regions of the fiber are organised into Bragg reflecting planes. These profiles developed subpeaks and broadened upon stretch of the fiber. The broad angle scan profiles are suggested to result from a decrease in the regular packing of myofibrils as the fiber is lengthened. The angular width of the subpeaks is used to estimate the thickness of clusters of myofibrils. The variation in sarcomere length along the fiber, as determined by the 0th to 1st diffraction order spacing, was dependent upon the fiber preparation. Glycerinated fibers and those bathed in relaxing solution showed more variation than fixed fibers. The variation of sarcomere length is compared to the variation in thick filament lengths inLimulus reported by Dewey et al. (1982) lengths inLimulus reported by Dewey et al. (1982). These results are compared to those obtained from frog fiber segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baskin RJ, Lieber RL, Oba T, Yeh Y (1981) Intensity of light diffraction from striated muscle as a function of incident angle. Biophys J 36:759–773

  2. Baskin RJ, Burton K, Yeh Y, Corcoran M (1983) Light diffraction studies ofLimulus muscle fibers. Biophys J 41:32a

  3. Betz W, Sakmann B (1973) Effects of proteolytic enzymes on function and structure of frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol 230:673–688

  4. Cleworth DR, Edman KAP (1972) Changes in sarcomere length during isometric tension development in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 227:1–17

  5. de Villafranca GW, Marschhaus CE (1963) Contraction of the A band. J Ultra Res 9:156–165

  6. Davidheiser S, Levine R, Davies R (1982) Two different fiber types inLimulus telson mucle. Fed Proc 41:1522

  7. Dewey M, Blasie K, Levine R, Colflesh D (1972) Changes in A-band structure during shortening of a paramyosin-containing striated muscle. Biophys J 12:82a

  8. Dewey M, Levine R, Coleflesh D (1973) Structure ofLimulus striated muscle. The contractile apparatus at various sarcomere lengths. J Cell Biol 58:574–593

  9. Dewey M, Colflesh D, Brink P, Fan S-F, Gaylinn B, Gural N (1982) Structural, functional, and chemical changes in the contractile apparatus ofLimulus striated muscle as a function of sarcomere shortening and tension development. In: Twarog B, Levine R, Dewey M (eds) Basic biology of muscles: a comparative approach. Raven Press, New York, pp 53–72

  10. Dewey M, Brink P, Colflesh DE, Gaylinn B, Fan S-F, Anapol F (1984)Limulus striated muscle provides an unusual model for muscle contraction. In: Pollack G, Sugi H (eds) Contractile mechanisms in muscle (Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 170). Plenum Press, New York, p 93

  11. Fourtner C, Sherman R (1972) A light and electron microscopic examination of muscles in the walking legs of the horseshoe crab,Limulus polyphemus (L). Can J Zool 50:1447–1455

  12. Franzini-Armstrong C (1970) Natural variability in the length of thin and thick filaments in single fibres from a crab,Portunas depurator. J Cell Sci 6:559–592

  13. Fujime S (1984) An intensity expression of optical diffraction from striated muscle fibers. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 5:577–587

  14. Huxley AF Peachey LD (1961) The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate striated muscle. J Physiol 156:150–165

  15. Huxley AF (1980) Reflections on muscle. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, pp 60–61

  16. Kawai M, Kuntz I (1973) Optical diffraction studies of muscle fibers. Biophys J 13:857–876

  17. Leung Af (1982) Laser diffraction of single intact cardiac muscle cells at rest. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 3:399–418

  18. Leung AF (1983) Determination of myofibrillar diameter by light diffractometry. Pflügers Arch 396:238–242

  19. Leung AF (1984) Fine structures in the light diffraction pattern of striated muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 5:535–558

  20. Lieber RL, Yeh Y, Baskin RJ (1984) Sarcomere length determination using laser diffraction: the effect of beam and fiber diameter. Biophys J 45:1007–1016

  21. Paolini PJ, Sabbadini R, Roos KP, Baskin RJ (1976) Sarcomere length dispersion in single skeletal muscle fibers and fiber bundles. Biophys J 16:919–930

  22. Rome E (1967) Light and X-ray diffraction studies of the filament lattice of glycerol-extracted rabbit psoas muscle. J Mol Biol 27:591–602

  23. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F (1979a) Do laser diffraction studies on striated muscle indicate stepwise sarcomere shortening? Nature 278:573–575

  24. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F (1979b) Interpretation of light diffraction by cross-striated muscle as Bragg reflexion of light by the lattice of contractile proteins. J Physiol 290:317–330

  25. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F (1980) Efficiency of light diffraction by cross-striated muscle fibers under stretch und during isometric contraction. Biophys J 30:507–516

  26. Sandow A (1936) Diffraction patterns of the frog sartorius and sarcomere behavior under stretch. J Cell Comp Physiol 9:37–54

  27. Sundell CL, Goldman YE, Peachey LD (1985) Microstructure in near-field and far-field laser diffraction patterns of muscle fibers. Biophys J 47:383a

  28. Tameyasu T, Ishide N, Pollack GH (1982) Discrete sarcomere length distribution in skeletal muscle. Biophys J 37:489–492

  29. Walcott B, Dewey M (1980) Length-tension relation inLimulus striated muscle. J Cell Biol 87:204–208

  30. Wray J, Vibert P, Cohen C (1974) Cross-bridge arrangements inLimulus muscle. J Mol Biol 88:343–348

  31. Yeh Y, Baskin RJ, Lieber RL, Roos KP (1980) Theory of light diffraction by single skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys J 29:509–522

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ronald J. Baskin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burton, K., Baskin, R.J. Light diffraction patterns and sarcomere length variation in striated muscle fibers ofLimulus . Pflugers Arch. 406, 409–418 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00590945

Download citation

Key words

  • Muscle
  • Laser diffraction
  • Limulus