Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 62, Issue 1–2, pp 95–108 | Cite as

The pheromone signal pathway inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

  • James B. Konopka
  • Stanley Fields
Article

Abstract

Haploid cells of the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae normally undergo a budding life cycle, but after binding the appropriate mating pheromone they undergo a different developmental pathway that leads to conjugation. This intercellular communication between the two mating types activates a signal transduction pathway that stimulates the diverse physiological changes required for conjugation, such as induction of cell surface agglutinins, cell division arrest in G1, morphogenesis to form a conjugation tube, and cell fusion. The components of this pathway include a G protein-coupled receptor, several protein kinases, and a pheromone-responsive transcription factor. The molecular mechanisms that transduce the pheromone signal are remarkably similar to the mechanisms of hormone signaling used in multicellular organisms. Thus, the analysis of the pheromone signal pathway in yeast directly contributes to the study of cell growth and development in other eukaryotic organisms.

Key words

cell cycle control G protein hormone signaling mating transcription yeast 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achstetter T & Wolf DH (1985) Hormone processing and membranebound proteinases in yeast. EMBO J. 4: 173–177Google Scholar
  2. Ammerer G (1990) Identification, purification, and cloning of a polypeptide (PRTF/GRM) that binds to mating-specific promoter elements in yeast. Genes Dev. 4: 299–312Google Scholar
  3. Anderegg RJ, Betz R, Carr SA, Crabb JW & Duntze W (1988) Structure ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae mating hormone a-factor. J. Biol. Chem. 263: 18236–18240Google Scholar
  4. Baba M, Baba N, Ohsumi Y, Kanaya K & Ohsumi M (1989) Three dimensional analysis of morphogenesis induced by mating pheromone α-factor inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Science 94: 207–216Google Scholar
  5. de Barros Lopes M, Ho J-Y & Reed SI (1990) Mutations in cell division cycle genesCDC36 andCDC39 activate theSaccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromone response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 2966–2972Google Scholar
  6. Bender A & Sprague GF (1986) Yeast peptide pheromones, a-factor and α-factor, activate a common response mechanism in their target cells. Cell 47: 929–937Google Scholar
  7. (1987) MATα1 protein, a yeast transcription activator, binds synergistically with a second protein to a set of cell-type-specific genes. Cell 50: 681–691Google Scholar
  8. (1989) Pheromones and pheromone receptors are the primary determinants of mating specificity in the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 121: 463–476Google Scholar
  9. Blinder D & Jenness D (1989) Regulation of post-receptor signaling in the pheromone response pathway ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 3720–3726Google Scholar
  10. Blinder D, Bouvier S & Jenness DD (1989) Constitutive mutants in the yeast pheromone response: ordered function of the gene products. Cell 56: 479–486Google Scholar
  11. Blumer KJ & Thorner J (1990) β and γ subunits of a yeast guanine nucleotide-binding protein are not essential for membrane association of the α subunit but are required for receptor coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87: 4363–4367Google Scholar
  12. Boulton TG, Nye SH, Robbins DJ, Ip NY, Radziejewska E, Morgenbesser SD, DePinho RA, Panayotatos N, Cobb MH & Yancopoulos GD (1991) ERKs: a family of protein-serine/threonine kinases that are activated and tyrosine phosphorylated in response to insulin and NGF. Cell 65: 663–675Google Scholar
  13. Brake AJ, Brenner C, Najarian R, Laybourn P & Merryweather J (1985) Structure of genes encoding precursors of yeast peptide mating pheromone a-factor. In: Gething MJ (Ed) Current Communications in Molecular Biology (pp. 103–108). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Burkholder AC & Hartwell LH (1985) The yeast α-factor receptor: structural properties deduced from the seqeunce of theSTE2 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 13: 8463–8475Google Scholar
  15. Byers B (1981) Cytology of the yeast life cycle. In: Strathern JN, Jones EW & Broach JR (Eds) The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. I. Life Cycle and Inheritance (pp. 59–96). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Cartwright CP & Tipper DJ (1991)In vivo analysis of Ste2, a yeast plasma membrane protein, by using β-lactamase gene fusions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 2620–2628Google Scholar
  17. Chang F & Herskowitz I (1990) Identification of a gene necessary for cell cycle arrest by a negative growth factor of yeast: FAR1 is an inhibitor of a G1 cyclin, CLN2. Cell 63: 999–1011Google Scholar
  18. Chant J & Herskowitz I (1991) Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65: 1203–1212Google Scholar
  19. Chant J, Corrado K, Pringle JR & Herskowitz I (1991) YeastBUD5, encoding a putative GDP-GTP exchange factor, is necessary for bud site selection and interacts with bud formation geneBEM1. Cell 65: 1213–1224Google Scholar
  20. Chvatchko Y, Howald I & Reizman H (1986) Two yeast mutants defective in endocytosis are defective in pheromone response. Cell 46: 355–364Google Scholar
  21. Clark KL & SpragueJr GF (1989) Yeast pheromone response pathway: characterization of a suppressor that restores mating to receptorless mutants. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 2682–2694Google Scholar
  22. Cole GM & Reed SI (1991) Pheromone induced phosphorylation of a G protein β subunit inS. cerevisiae is associated with an adaptive response to mating pheromone. Cell 64: 703–716Google Scholar
  23. Cole GM, Stone DE & Reed SI (1990) Stoichiometry of G protein subunits affects theSaccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromone signal transduction pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 510–517Google Scholar
  24. Courchesne WE, Kunisawa R & Thorner J (1989) A putative protein kinase overcomes pheromone-induced arrest of cell cycling inS. cerevisiae. Cell 58: 1107–1119Google Scholar
  25. Cross F (1988)DAF1, a mutant gene affecting size control, pheromone arrest, and cell cycle kinetics ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 4675–4684Google Scholar
  26. Dietzel C & Kurjan J (1987a) The yeastSCG1 gene: a Gα-like protein implicated in thea- and α-factor response pathway. Cell 50: 1001–1010Google Scholar
  27. (1987b) Pheromonal regulation and sequence of theSaccharomyces cerevisiae SST2 gene: a model for desensitization to pheromone. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 4169–4177Google Scholar
  28. Dmochowska A, Dignard D, Henning D, Thomas DY & Bussey H (1987) YeastKEX1 gene encodes a putative protease with a carboxypeptidase B-like function involved in killer toxin and α-factor precursor processing. Cell 50: 573–584Google Scholar
  29. Dohlman HG, Thorner J, Caron MG & Lefkowitz RJ (1991) Model systems for the study of 7-transmembrane-segment receptors. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 60: 653–688.Google Scholar
  30. Dolan JW & Fields S (1991) Cell-type-specific transcription in yeast. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 1088: 155–169Google Scholar
  31. Dolan JW, Kirkman C & Fields S (1989) The yeast STE12 protein binds to the DNA sequence mediating pheromone induction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86: 5703–5707Google Scholar
  32. Drubin DG (1991) Development of cell polarity in budding yeast. Cell 65: 1093–1096Google Scholar
  33. Egel R, Nielson O & Weilguny D (1990) Sexual differentiation in fission yeast. Trends in Genet. 6: 369–373Google Scholar
  34. Elion EA, Grisafi PL & Fink GR (1990)FUS3 encodes a cdc2+/ CDC28-related kinase required for the transition from mitosis into conjugation. Cell 60: 649–664Google Scholar
  35. Elion EA, Brill JA & Fink GR (1991) FUS3 represses CLN1 and CLN2 and in concert with KSS1 promotes signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88: 9392–9396Google Scholar
  36. Errede B & Ammerer G (1989) STE12, a protein involved in cell-type-specific transcription and signal transduction in yeast, is part of protein-DNA complexes. Genes Dev. 3: 1349–1361Google Scholar
  37. Fields S, Chaleff DT & Sprague GFJr (1988) YeastSTE7, STE11 andSTE12 genes are required for expression of cell-type-specific genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 551–556Google Scholar
  38. Hagen DC, McCaffrey G & Sprague GF (1986) Evidence the yeastSTE3 gene encodes a receptor for the peptide pheromone a factor: gene sequence and implications for the structure of the presumed receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83: 1418–1422Google Scholar
  39. Hartig A, Holly J, Saari G & MacKay VL (1986) Multiple regulation ofSTE2, a mating-type-specific gene ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6: 2106–2114Google Scholar
  40. Hartwell L (1980) Mutants ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae unresponsive to cell division control by polypeptide mating hormone. J. Cell Biol. 85: 811–822Google Scholar
  41. Herskowitz I (1989) A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast. Nature 342: 749–757Google Scholar
  42. Hirsch JP, Dietzel C & Kurjan J (1991) The carboxyl-terminus of Scg1, the Gα subunit involved in yeast mating, is implicated in interactions with the pheromone receptors. Genes Dev. 5: 467–474Google Scholar
  43. Hyrcina CA & Clarke S (1990) Farnesyl cysteine C-terminal methyltransferase activity is dependent upon theSTE14 gene product inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 5071–5076Google Scholar
  44. Irie K, Nomoto S, Miyajima I & Matsumoto K (1991)SGV1 encodes aCDC28/cdc2-related kinase required for a Gα subunit-mediated adaptive response to pheromone inS. cerevisiae. Cell 65: 785–795Google Scholar
  45. Jackson CL & Hartwell LH (1990a) Courtship inSaccharomyces cerevisiae: an early cell-cell interaction during mating. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5: 2202–2213Google Scholar
  46. Jackson CL & Hartwell LH (1990b) Courtship inSaccharomyces cerevisiae: both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal. Cell 63: 1039–1051Google Scholar
  47. Jackson CL, Konopka JB & Hartwell LH (1991)S. cerevisiae α-pheromone receptors activate a novel signal transduction pathway for mating partner discrimination. Cell 67: 389–402Google Scholar
  48. Jahng K-Y, Ferguson J & Reed SI (1988) Mutations in a gene encoding the α subunit of aSaccharomyces cerevisiae G protein indicate a role in mating pheromone signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 2484–2493Google Scholar
  49. Jenness DD & Spatrick P (1986) Down regulation of the α-factor pheromone receptor inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 46: 345–353Google Scholar
  50. Jenness DD, Burkholder AC & Hartwell LH (1983) Binding of α-factor pheromone to yeasta cells: chemical and genetic evidence for an α-factor receptor. Cell 35: 521–529Google Scholar
  51. Julius D, Blair L, Brake A, Sprague G & Thorner J (1983) Yeast α-factor is processed from a larger precursor polypeptide: the essential role of a membrane-bound dipeptidyl aminopeptidase. Cell 32: 839–852Google Scholar
  52. Julius D, Brake A, Blair L, Kunisawa R & Thorner J (1984) Isolation of the putative structural gene for the lysine-arginine-cleaving endopeptidase required for the processing of yeast pre-pro-alpha-factor. Cell 37: 1075–1089Google Scholar
  53. Kang Y-S, Kane J, Kurjan J, Stadel JM & Tipper DJ (1990) Effects of expression of mammalian Gα and hybrid mammalian-yeast Gα proteins on the yeast pheromone response signal transduction pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 2582–2590Google Scholar
  54. Kaziro Y, Itoh H, Kozasa T, Nakafuku M & Satoh T (1991) Structure and function of signal-transducing GTP-binding proteins. Ann Rev. Biochem. 60: 349–400Google Scholar
  55. Keleher CA, Goutte C & Johnson AD (1988) The yeast cell-type-specific repressor α2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein. Cell 53: 927–936Google Scholar
  56. King K, Dohlman HC, Thorner J, Caron MG & Lefkowitz RJ. Control of yeast mating signal transduction by a mammalian β2-adrenergic receptor and the Gs α-subunit. Science 250: 121–123Google Scholar
  57. Konopka JB, Jenness DD & Hartwell LH (1988) The C-terminus of theSaccharomyces cerevisiae α-pheromone receptor mediates an adaptive response to pheromone. Cell 54: 609–620Google Scholar
  58. Kuchler K, Sterne RE & Thorner J (1989)Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE6 gene product: a novel pathway for protein export in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J 8: 3973–3984Google Scholar
  59. Kurjan J & Herskowitz I (1982) Structure of a yeast pheromone gene (MFα): a putative α-factor precursor contains four tandem copies of mature α-factor. Cell 30: 933–943Google Scholar
  60. Kurjan J, Hirsch JP & Dietzel C (1991) Mutations in the guanine nucleotide-binding domains of a yeast Gα protein confer a constitutive or uninducible state to the pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev. 5: 475–483Google Scholar
  61. Lipke PN, Wojciechowicz D & Kurjan J (1989)AGα1 is the structural gene for theSaccharomyces cerevisiae α-agglutinin, a cell-surface glycoprotein involved in cell-cell interactions during mating. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 3155–3165Google Scholar
  62. MacKay VL & Manney TR (1974) Mutations affecting sexual conjugation and related processes inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Genetic analysis of nonmating mutants. Genetics 76: 272–282Google Scholar
  63. MacKay VL, Welch SK, Insley MY, Manney TR, Holly J, Saari GC & Parker ML (1988) TheSaccharomyces cerevisiae BAR1 gene encodes an exported protein with homology to pepsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 55–59Google Scholar
  64. Marsh L & Herskowitz I (1988) STE2 protein ofSaccharomyces kluyveri is a member of the rhodopsin/β-adrenergic receptor family and is responsible for recognition of the peptide ligand α-factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 3855–3859Google Scholar
  65. Marx J (1991) How peptide hormones get ready for work. Science 252: 779–780Google Scholar
  66. McCaffrey G, Clay FJ, Kelsay K & Sprague GFJr (1987) Identification and regulation of a gene required for cell fusion during mating of the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 2680–2690Google Scholar
  67. McGrath JP & Varshavsky A (1989) The yeastSTE6 gene encodes a homologue of the mammalian multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein. Nature 340: 400–404Google Scholar
  68. Meluh P & Rose MD (1990)KAR3, a kinesin-related gene required for yeast nuclear fusion. Cell 60: 1029–1041Google Scholar
  69. Miyajima I, Nakafuku M, Nakayama N, Brenner C, Miyajima A, Kaibuchi K, Arai K, Kaziro Y & Matsumoto K (1987)GPA1, a haploid-specific essential gene, encodes a yeast homolog of mammalian G protein which may be involved in mating factor signal transduction. Cell 50: 1011–1019Google Scholar
  70. Miyajima I, Arai K & Matsumoto K (1989) GPA1val50 mutation in the mating-factor signaling pathway inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 2289–2297Google Scholar
  71. Moore SA (1983) Comparison of dose-response curves for α factor-induced cell division arrest, agglutination, and projection formation of yeast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 258: 13849–13856Google Scholar
  72. (1984) Yeast cells recover from α-factor-induced division arrest in the absence of α-factor destruction. J. Biol. Chem. 259: 1004–1010Google Scholar
  73. Nakayama N, Miyajima A & Arai K (1985) Nucleotide sequences ofSTE2 andSTE3, cell type specific sterile genes fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 4: 2643–2648Google Scholar
  74. Nakayama N, Miyajima A & Arai K (1987) Common signal transduction system shared bySTE2 andSTE3 in haploid cells ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae: autocrine cell-cycle arrest results from forced expression ofSTE2. EMBO J. 6: 249–254Google Scholar
  75. Nakayama N, Kaziro Y, Arai K-I & Matsumoto K (1988) Role ofSTE genes in the mating factor signaling pathway mediated byGPA1 inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 3777–3783Google Scholar
  76. Nash R, Tokiwa G, Anand S, Erickson K & Futcher AB (1988) TheWH11 + gene ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae tethers cell division to cell size and is a cyclin homolog. EMBO J. 7: 4335–4346Google Scholar
  77. Nasmyth K & Shore D (1987) Transcriptional regulation in the yeast life cycle. Science 237: 1162–1170Google Scholar
  78. Neiman AM, Chang F, Komachi K & Herskowitz I (1990) CDC36 and CDC39 are negative elements in the signal transduction pathway of yeast. Cell. Reg. 1: 391–401Google Scholar
  79. Nomoto S, Nakayama N, Arai K & Matsumoto K (1990) Regulation of the yeast pheromone response pathway by G protein subunits. EMBO J. 9: 691–696Google Scholar
  80. Passmore S, Maine GT, Elble R, Christ C & Tye B (1988)Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein involved in plasmid maintenance is necessary for mating ofMATα cells. J. Mol. Biol. 204: 593–606Google Scholar
  81. Powers S, Michaelis S, Broek D, Santa Anna-A S, Field J, Herskowitz I & Wigler M (1986)RAM, a gene of yeast required for a functional modification of RAS proteins and for production of mating pheromonea-factor. Cell 47: 413–422Google Scholar
  82. Reed SI (1991) G1-specific cyclins: in search of an S-phase-promoting factor. Trends in Genetics 7: 95–99Google Scholar
  83. Reneke JE, Blumer KJ, Courchesne WE & Thorner J (1988) The carboxyl-terminal segment of the yeast α-factor receptor is a regulatory domain. Cell 55: 221–234Google Scholar
  84. Rhodes N, Connell L & Errede B (1990) STE11 is a protein kinase required for cell-type-specific transcription and signal transduction in yeast. Genes Dev. 4: 1862–1874Google Scholar
  85. Richardson HE, Wittenberg C, Cross F & Reed SI (1989) An essential G1 function for cyclin-like proteins in yeast. Cell 59: 1127–1133Google Scholar
  86. Rose MD, Price BR & Fink GR (1986)Saccharomyces cerevisiae nuclear fusion requires prior activation by alpha-factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6: 3490–3497Google Scholar
  87. Ryan WAJr, Franza BRJr & Gilman MZ (1989) Two distinct cellular phosphoproteins bind to thec-fos serum response element. EMBO J. 6: 1785–1792Google Scholar
  88. Shaw PE, Schroter H & Nordheim A (1989) The ability of a ternary complex to form over the serum response element correlates with serum inducibility of the humanc-fos promoter. Cell 56: 563–572Google Scholar
  89. Song O, Dolan JW, Yuan YO & Fields S (1991) Pheromone-dependent phosphorylation of the yeast STE12 protein correlates with transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 5: 741–750Google Scholar
  90. Sprague GFJr (1990) Combinatorial associations of regulatory proteins and the control of cell type in yeast. Adv. Genet. 27: 33–67Google Scholar
  91. Steden M, Betz R & Duntze W (1989) Isolation and characterization ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to G1 arrest by the mating hormonea-factor. Mol. Gen. Genet. 219: 439–444Google Scholar
  92. Stone DE & Reed SI (1990) G protein mutations that alter the pheromone response inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 4439–4446Google Scholar
  93. Teague MA, Chaleff DT & Errede B (1986) Nucleotide sequence of the yeast regulatory geneSTE7 predicts a protein homologous to protein kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 7371–7375Google Scholar
  94. Trueheart & Fink GR (1989) The yeast cell fusion protein FUS1 is O-glycosylated and spans the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86: 9916–9920Google Scholar
  95. Trueheart J, Boeke JD & Fink GR (1987) Two genes required for cell fusion during yeast conjugation: evidence for a pheromone-induced surface protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 2316–2328Google Scholar
  96. Whiteway M, Hougan L, Dignard D, Thomas DY, Bell L, Saari GC, Grant FJ, O'Hara P & MacKay VL (1989) TheSTE4 andSTE18 genes of yeast encode potential β and γ subunits of the mating factor receptor-coupled G protein. Cell 56: 467–477Google Scholar
  97. Whiteway M, Hougan L & Thomas DY (1990) Overexpression of theSTE4 gene leads to mating response in haploidSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 217–222Google Scholar
  98. Wittenberg C, Sugimoto K & Reed SI (1990) G1-specific cyclins ofS. cerevisiae: cell cycle periodicity, regulation by mating pheromones and association with the p34CDC28 protein kinase. Cell 62: 225–237Google Scholar
  99. Yu L, Blumer KJ, Davidson N, Lester HA & Thorner J (1989) Functional expression of the yeast α-factor receptor inXenopus oocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 2087–20850Google Scholar
  100. Yuan YO & Fields S (1991) Properties of the DNA-binding domain of theSaccharomyces cerevisiae STE12 protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 5910–5918Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • James B. Konopka
    • 1
  • Stanley Fields
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations