Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 397, Issue 3, pp 237–242 | Cite as

Excitatory postsynaptic channels operated by quisqualate in crayfish muscle

  • H. Stettmeier
  • W. Finger
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Small crayfish muscle fibers were voltage clamped and membrane current noise elicited by bath application of quisqualate, a compound structurally related to the excitatory transmitter glutamate, was measured. It was found that quisqualate activates the same excitatory postsynaptic receptors as glutamate but its affinity for these receptors is about one hundred times larger. Noise analysis revealed that the high potency of quisqualate was attributable in part to an increased apparent mean channel open time, τnoise (quisqualate), which was about ten times larger than on activation by glutamate. The channel conductance γ(quisqualate), however, was about three times smaller than γ(glutamate). AtT=8°C andE=−60 mV, τnoise (quisqualate)=9.3±1.8 ms and γ(quisqualate)=9.7±1.1 pS resulted. τnoise (quisqualate) decreased with hyperpolarization but it was much less voltage dependent than τnoise (glutamate): τnoise (quisqualate) =6.0 ms·exp (E/362 mV). Both γ(quisqualate) and α = τ noise -1 (quisqualate) increased with temperature (Q10∼1.6). This temperature dependence was characterized by the temperature independent activation energiesEγ=29.1±1.7 kJ/mol andEα=33.9±1.3 kJ/mol. Concanavalin A which blocks desensitization of the quisqualate/glutamate receptors did not influence τnoise (quisqualate) significantly.

Key words

Excitatory synaptic transmission Excitatory postsynaptic channels Glutamate analogues Quisqualate Noise analysis 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson CR, Stevens CF (1973) Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 235:655–691Google Scholar
  2. Anderson CR, Cull-Candy SG, Miledi R (1978) Glutamate current noise: post-synaptic channel kinetics investigated under voltage clamp. J Physiol (Lond) 282:219–242Google Scholar
  3. Colquhoun D, Sakmann B (1981) Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels. Nature 294:464–466Google Scholar
  4. Colquhoun D, Dionne VE, Steinbach JH, Stevens CF (1975) Conductance of channels opened by acetylcholine-like drugs in muscle end-plate. Nature 253:204–206Google Scholar
  5. Cull-Candy SG, Parker I (1982) Rapid kinetics of single glutamatereceptor channels. Nature 295:410–412Google Scholar
  6. Cull-Candy SG, Parker I (1982) Burst kinetics of single glutamate receptor channels in locust muscle activated by different agonists. J Physiol (Lond) 327:73PGoogle Scholar
  7. Cull-Candy SG, Miledi R, Parker I (1981) Single glutamate-activated channels recorded from locust muscle fibres with perfused patchclamp electrodes. J Physiol (Lond) 321:195–210Google Scholar
  8. Dudel J (1974) Noninear voltage dependence of excitatory synaptic current in crayfish muscle. Pflügers Arch 352:227–241Google Scholar
  9. Dudel J (1977) Aspartate and other inhibitors of excitatory synaptic transmission in crayfish muscle. Pflügers Arch 369:7–16Google Scholar
  10. Dudel J (1979) The voltage dependence of the decay of the excitatory postsynaptic current and the effect of concanavalin A at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Paris) 75:601–604Google Scholar
  11. Finger W, Stettmeier H (1980) Efficacy of the two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique in crayfish muscle. Pflügers Arch 387:133–141Google Scholar
  12. Finger W, Stettmeier H (1981) Excitatory synaptic channels in crayfish muscle activated by quisqualate. Pflügers Arch 389 (Suppl):R45/177Google Scholar
  13. Glasstone S, Laidler KJ, Eyring H (1941) The theory of rate processes. Mc Graw Hill, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz B, Miledi R (1972) The statistical nature of the acetylcholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol (Lond) 224:665–699Google Scholar
  15. Kawagoe R, Onodera K, Takeuchi A (1981) Release of glutamate from the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 312:225–236Google Scholar
  16. Kawagoe R, Onodera K, Takeuchi A (1982) On the quantal release of endogenous glutamate from the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 322:529–539Google Scholar
  17. Mathers DA (1981) The influence of concanavalin A on glutamate induced current fluctuations in locust muscle fibres. J Physiol (Lond) 312:1–8Google Scholar
  18. Mathers DA, Usherwood PNR (1976) Concanavalin A blocks desensitization of glutamate receptors in insect muscle fibres. Nature 259:409–411Google Scholar
  19. Mathers DA, Usherwood PNR (1978) Effects of concanavalin A on junctional and extrajunctionall-glutamate receptors on locust skeletal muscle fibres. Comp Biochem Physiol 59C:151–155Google Scholar
  20. Onodera K, Takeuchi A (1980) Distribution and pharmacological properties of synaptic and extrasynaptic glutamate receptors on crayfish muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 306:233–250Google Scholar
  21. Sakmann B, Patlak J, Neher E (1980) Single acetylcholine-activated channels show burst-kinetics in presence of desensitizing concentrations of agonist. Nature 286:71–73Google Scholar
  22. Shinozaki H (1980) The pharmacology of the excitatory neuromuscular junction in the crayfish. Progres in Neurobiology 14:121–155Google Scholar
  23. Shinozaki H, Shibuya I (1974) A new potent excitant, quisqualic acid: effects on crayfish neuromuscular junction. Neuropharmacology 13:665–672Google Scholar
  24. Shinozaki H, Ishida M (1978b) Prevention of desensitization of the glutamate receptor on the crayfish opener muscle by concanavalin A. J Pharmacol Dyn 1:246–250Google Scholar
  25. Shinozaki H, Ishida M (1979) Pharmacological distinction between the excitatory junctional potential and the glutamate potential revealed by concanavalin A at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. Brain Res 161:493–501Google Scholar
  26. Stettmeier H (1982) Aktivierung erregender postsynaptischer Ionenkanäle des Krebsmuskels durch Glutamat und Quisqualat. Eine Untersuchung mit der Methode der Fluktuationsanalyse. Dissertation, Technische Universität München, FRGGoogle Scholar
  27. Stettmeier H, Finger W, Dudel J (1978) Synaptic current noise induced by glutamate in crayfish muscle. Pflügers Arch 377:R44/174Google Scholar
  28. Stettmeier H, Finger W, Dudel J (1983a) Glutamate activated postsynaptic channels in crayfish muscle investigated by noise analysis. Pflügers Arch 397:13–19Google Scholar
  29. Stettmeier H, Finger W, Dudel J (1983b) Effects of concanavalin A on glutamate operated postsynaptic channels in crayfish muscle. Pflügers Arch 397:20–24Google Scholar
  30. Takeuchi A, Onodera K, Kawagoe R (1980) Release of endogenous glutamate from the neuromuscular junction of the crayfish. Proc Jpn Acad 56:246–249Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Stettmeier
    • 1
  • W. Finger
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiologisches Institut der Technischen Universität MünchenMünchen 40Germany

Personalised recommendations