Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 403, Issue 2, pp 156–163 | Cite as

Streaming potentials and diffusion potentials across rabbit proximal convoluted tubule

  • Bruno Corman
Transport Processes, Metabolism and Endocrinology; Kidney, Gastrointestinal Tract, and Exocrine Glands

Abstract

The streaming potential, defined as the transepithelial potential appearing in the presence of an osmotic water flow, was measured in rabbit kidney proximal convoluted tubules perfused in vitro. The S2 segments studied were dissected from mid-cortical and juxtamedullary portions of the kidney and the streaming potential induced by the addition of raffinose in bath was compared for each tubule with the diffusion potential corresponding to an imposed NaCl gradient in the absence of osmotic gradient. The amplitude of the measured streaming potential was found to vary from positive to negative values (+0.9 to −1.8 mV) according to the location of the dissected tubule: the more juxtamedullary the nephron, the more lumen negative was the streaming potential. This correlated well with the diffusion potentials recorded on the same tubules and the amplitude of the streaming potentials was a close function of the PNa/PCl ratios calculated from these diffusion potentials. This is in agreement with the hypothesis of solute polarization in an unstirred layer as the origin of the streaming potential; a calculation of hydraulic permeability (Pf) of the proximal tubule, taking the role of such an unstirred layer into consideration is proposed.

Key words

Streaming potential Diffusion potential Kidney proximal tubule Unstirred layer Nephron heterogeneity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreoli TE, Schaffer JA (1978) Volume absorption in the pars recta. III. Luminal hypotonicity as a driving force for isotonic volume absorption. Am J Physiol 234 (4):F349-F355Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreoli TE, Schaffer JA, Troutman SL (1978) Perfusion rate-dependence of transepithelial osmosis in isolated proximal convoluted tubules: estimation of the hydraulic conductance. Kidney Int 14:263–269Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andreoli TE, Schaffer JA (1979) Effective luminal hypotonicity: the driving force for isotonic proximal fluid absorption. Am J Physiol 236 (2):F89-F96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berry CA (1982) Heterogeneity of tubular transport process in the nephron. Ann Rev Physiol 44:181–201Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berry CA, Rector FC (1978) Relative sodium-to-chloride permeability in the proximal convoluted tubule. Am J Physiol 235 (6):F592-F604Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berry CA (1983) Water permeability and pathways in the proximal tubule. Am J Physiol 245:F279-F294Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boulpaep EL, Seely JF (1971) Electrophysiology of proximal and distal tubules in the auto perfused dog kidney. Am J Physiol 221 (4):1084–1096Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burg MB, Grantham JJ, Abramow M, Orloff J (1966) Preparation and study of fragments of single rabbit nephrons. Am J Physiol 210:1293–1298Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpi-Medina P, Gonzalez E, Whittembury G (1983) Cell osmotic water permeability of isolated rabbit proximal convoluted tubules. Am J Physiol 244:F554-F563Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cereijido M, Robbins ES, Dolan WJ, Rotunno CA, Sabatini DD (1978) Polarized monolayer formed by epithelial cells on a permeable and translucent support. J Cell Biol 77:853–880Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corman B, Di Stefano A (1983) Does water drag solutes through kidney proximal tubule? Pflügers Arch 397:35–41Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dainty J (1963) Water relations of plant cells. Adv Botan Res 1:279–326Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diamond JM (1966) Non-linear osmosis. J Physiol 183:58–82Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diamond JM (1966) The effect of membrane fixed charges on diffusion potentials and streaming potentials. J Physiol 183:37–57Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diamond JM (1979) Osmotic water flow in leaky epithelia. J Membrane Biol 51:195–216Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Du Bois R, Vamory A, Abramow M (1976) Computation of the osmotic water permeability of perfused tubule segments. Kidney Int 10:478–479Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frömter E, Gebner K (1974) Active transport potentials, membrane diffusion potentials and streaming potentials across rat kidney proximal tubule. Pflügers Arch 351:85–98Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frömter E, Müller CW, Wick T (1973) Permeability of the proximal tubular epithelium of the rat kidney studied with electrophysiological methods. In: G. Giebisch (ed) Electrophysiology of epithelial cells. Schattauer: Stuttgart New York pp 119–146Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobson HR, Kokko JP (1976) Intrinsic differences in various segments of the proximal convoluted tubule. J Clin Invest 57:818–825Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacobson HR, Kokko JP Seldin DW, Holmberg C (1982) Lack of solvent drag of NaCl and Na HCO3 in rabbit proximal tubules. Am J Physiol 243:F342-F348Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laprade R, Cardinal J (1983) Liquid junctions and isolated proximal tubule transepithelial potentials. Am J Physiol 244:F304-F319Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lim JL, Liebovitch LS, Fischbarg J (1983) Ionic selectivity of the paracellular shunt path across rabbit corneal endothelium. J Membrane Biol 73:95–102Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Misfeldt DS, Hamamoto ST, Pitelka DR (1976) Transepithelial transport in cell culture. Proc Nat Acad Sci 73 (4):1212–1216Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smyth DH, Wright EM (1966) Streaming potentials in the rat small intestine. J Physiol 182:591–602Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Os CH, Wiedner GW, Wright EM (1978) Volume flows accross gallbladder epithelium induced by small hydrostatic and osmotic gradients. J Membrane Biol 49:1–20Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vargas FF (1968) Water flux and electrokinetic phenomena in the squid axon. J Gen Physiol 51 (2):123–130SGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Welling DJ, Welling LW, Hill JJ (1978) Phenomenological model relating cell shape to water reabsorption in proximal nephron. Am J Physiol 234 (4):F308-F317Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Welling LW, Welling DJ, Ochs TJ (1983) Video measurement of basolateral membrane hydraulic conductivity in the proximal tubule. Am J Physiol 245 (14):F123-F129Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wright EM, Smulders AP, Torney JM (1972) The role of the lateral intercellular spaces and solute polarization effects in the passive flow of water across rabbit gallbladder. J Membrane Biol 7:198–219Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Corman
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de BiologieCEN SaclayGif-sur-Yvette, CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations