Advertisement

Social psychiatry

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 1–4 | Cite as

Geriatric euthanasia: attitudes and experiences of health professionals

  • H. B. Bosmann
  • J. Kay
  • E. A. Conter
Article

Summary

Increasingly, decisions to withhold treatment for the terminally ill have received considerable attention in medical, ethical, legal and lay publications. Few studies, however, have examined in detail the beliefs of health professionals about euthanasia, and more importantly, the frequency with which euthanasia occurs. A questionnaire was administered to 190 health care professionals (three-fourths of whom were affiliated with long term health care facilities) to examine these two questions. With regard to passive euthanasia, 83% of the respondents had heard of such cases, 56% had participated, 37% had given the permission for it to occur, and 17% had withheld life support system. With respect to active euthanasia, results were as follows: hearsay, 44%; participation, 21%; permission, 37%; and direct action, 20%. This study supports the need for health care professionals to become more active in the development of broad professional and individual institutional ethical guidelines in the care of the terminally ill.

Keywords

Public Health Health Care Health Professional Health Care Facility Support System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barnard C (1980) Good life good death: A doctor's case for euthanasia and suicide. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Creighton H (1983) Termination of life-sustaining treatment. Nurs Manag 14: 14–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United States President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983) Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: A Report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. US Government Printing Office, Washington (DC)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The citation (1981) Current medicolegal issues. Conn Med 45: 45–46Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lo P, Jonsen AR (1980) Clinical decisions to limit treatment. Ann Intern Med 93: 765–768Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis AJ (1981) Dilemmas in practice: To make live or let die. Am J Nurs 81: 582Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanderpool HY (1978) The ethics of terminal care. J Am Med Assoc 239: 850–852Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winter A (ed) (1980) Life and death decisions. Charles C.Thomas, Springfield (IL), pp 31–55Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curran WJ, Hyg SM (1981) Court involvement in right-to-die cases: Judicial inquiry in New York. N Engl J Med 305: 75–76Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baron CH (1981) Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: Legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly. J Geriatr Psychiatry 14: 45–70Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Annas GJ (1981) Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Legal issues: The cases of brother fox and earle spring. J Geriatr Psychiatry 14: 31–43Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kluge EW (1981) The ethics of deliberate death. National University Publications, Kennikat Press, Port Washington (NY)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curtin L (1976) The Mask of euthanasia. Cincinnati: N(urses) C(oncerned) F(or) L(ife) (2nd edn)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lo B, Jonsen AR (1980) Ethical decisions in the care of a patient terminally ill with metastatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 92: 107–111Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meier DE, Cassel CK (1983) Euthanasia in old age: A case study and ethical analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 31: 294–298Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lasagna L (1984) A duty to die? Sciences 24: 7–8Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lipsitt DR (1981) Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Introduction: “To be or not to be”: Decision-making dilemmas in modern medicine. J Geriatr Psychiatry 14: 7–12Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pearlman RA, Inui TS, Carter WB (1982) Variability in physican bioethical decision-making. Ann Intern Med 97: 420–425Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wagner A (1984) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the aged: A prospective survey. N Engl J Med 310: 1129–1130Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winget C, Kapp FT, Yearworth R (1977) Attitudes towards euthanasia. J Med Ethics 3: 18–25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heifetz MD, Mangel C (1975) The right to die: A neurosurgeon speaks of death with candor. G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York (NY)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson D, Fitch SD, Alston JP, et al (1980) Acceptance of conditional suicide and euthanasia among adult Americans. Suicide Life Threat Behav 10: 157–166Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stead EA, Jr (1982) Unsolved issues in medicine: Geriatrics as a case in point. J Am Geriatr Soc 30: 231–234Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levinson AJR (1981) Termination of life support systems in the elderly: Ethical issues. J Geriatr Psychiatry 14: 71–85Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    George JE, Quattrone MS (1983) Prolongation of life: When should we stop? J Med Soc (NJ) 80: 997–1001Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Childress JF (1981) To live or let die. In: Priorities in biomedical ethics. Westminster Press, Philadelphia (PA), pp 507–523Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCormick RA (1974) To save or let die. J Am Med Assoc 229: 172–176Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. B. Bosmann
    • 1
  • J. Kay
    • 1
  • E. A. Conter
    • 1
  1. 1.College of MedicineUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations