Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 393, Issue 2, pp 179–189 | Cite as

Electrophysiological analysis of rat renal sugar and amino acid transport

I. Basic phenomena
  • E. Frömter
Transport Processes, Metabolism and Endocrinology; Kidney, Gastrointestinal Tract, and Exocrine Glands


The electrical events associated with the absorption ofd-glucose orl-amino acids in renal proximal tubules were studied in microperfusion experiments on rat kidneys in vivo. Intratubular application of these substrates led concomittantly to: 1) a shift of the transepithelial potential into lumen negative direction, 2) a partial depolarization of the tubular cell membranes and 3) a reduction of the electrical resistance of the brushborder membrane. By means of rapid perfusion experiments it was possible to discern two phases in the potential response to substrate perfusion, a fast initial response which reflects a substrate-induced Na+ ion current from lumen to cell, and a slower secondary response which reflects the relaxation of the intracellular ion and substrate concentrations towards new steady states. A quantitative analysis of the data yielded estimates of 1) the apical (Ra) and basal (Rb) cell membrane resistances and of the shunt resistance,Rs, of rat proximal tubule of approximatelyRa=255 Ω cm2,Rb=92 Ω cm2 andRs=5 Ω cm2 (all referred to the quasi macroscopic surface area of the tubular lumen), 2) the conductance of the Na+ and glucose cotransport pathway and 3) the driving forces acting on the cotransport mechanism in the brushborder membrane. The latter were found to be a) the electrical cell membrane potential of −74mV, b) the Na+ ion concentration gradient between the tubular lumen (c Na lum =145 mmol/l) and the cytoplasm (c Na cell ≈22mmol/l) which corresponds to an additional equivalent potential of 51 mV and c) the substrate concentration gradient, which varies according to the experimental conditions. Moreover the analysis provided a quantitative estimate of the relationship between the substrate-induced changes in transepithelial potential or short circuit current and the actual cotransport current in the brushborder membrane. Based on this analysis it is concluded that the stoichiometry of Na+ and glucose flux coupling in the brushborder membrane of rat proximal tubule is close to 1.0.

Key words

Rat renal proximal tubule Electrophysiology Cell membrane resistance Shunt resistance Na+ glucose cotransport Non-steady state analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barry RJC, Dikstein S, Matthews J, Smyth DH (1960) Electrical potentials in the isolated intestine. J Physiol 155: 17P-18PGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burg M, Patlak C, Green N, Villey D (1976) Organic solutes in fluid absorption by renal proximal convoluted tubules. Am J Physiol 231: 627–637Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crane RK, (1962) Hypothesis for mechanism of intestinal active transport of sugars. Fed Proc 21: 891–895Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frömter E (1972) The route of passive ion movement through the epithelium of Necturus gallbladden. J Membr Biol 8: 259–301Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frömter E (1977) Magnitude and significance of the paracellular shunt path in rat kidney proximal tubule. In: Kramer M, Lauterbach F (eds) Intestinal permeation. Excerpta Medica. Amsterdam, pp 166–178Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frömter E (1979) Solute transport across epithelia: What can we learn from micropuncture studies on kidney tubules. J Physiol 288: 1–31Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frömter E, Diamond JM (1972) Route of passive ion permeation in epithelia. Nature New Biol 235: 9–13Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frömter E, Gebler B (1977) Electrical properties of amphibian urinary epithelia. III. The cell membrane resistances and the effect of amiloride. Pflügers Arch 371: 99–108Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frömter E, Geßner K (1974) Active transport potentials, membrane diffusion potentials and streaming potentials across rat kidney proximal tubular epithelium. Pflügers Arch 351: 85–98Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frömter E, Lüer K (1973) Electrical studies on sugar transport kinetics of rat proximal tubule. Pflügers Arch (Suppl) 343: R47Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frömter E, Müller CW, Wick T (1971) Permeability properties of the proximal tubular epithelium of the rat kidney studied with electrophysiological methods. In: Giebisch G (ed) Electrophysiology of epithelial cells. F. K. Schattauer. Stuttgart New York, pp 119–146Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hansen UP, Slayman CL (1978) Current-voltage relationships for a clearly electrogenic cotransport system. In: Hoffman JF (ed) Membrane transport processes, Vol 1. Raven Press, New York, pp 141–154Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoshi T (1976) Electrophysiological studies on amino acid transport across the luminal membrane of the proximal tubular cells of Triturus kidney. In: Silbernagl S, Lang F, Greger R (eds) Amino acid transport and uric acid transport. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 96–104Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoshi T, Kawahara K, Yokoyama R, Suenaga K (1981) Changes in membrane resistances of renal proximal tubule induced by cotransport of sodium and organic solutes. In: Takács L (ed) Adv Physiol Sci Vol 11, Kidney and body fluids. Pergamon Press and Akademiai Akido, Budapest, pp 403–407Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoshi T, Kikuta Y (1977) Effects of organic solute-sodium cotransport on the transmembrane potentials and resistance parameters of the proximal tubule of Triturus kidney. In: Anagnostopoulos T (ed) Electrophysiology of the nephron. Vol 67. Edition INSERM, Paris, pp 135–160Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iwatsuki N, Petersen OH (1980) Amino acid-evoked membrane potential and resistance changes in pancreatic acinar cells. Pflügers Arch 386: 153–159Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khuri RN (1979) Electrochemistry of the nephron. In: Giebisch G, Tosteson DC, Ussing HH (eds) Membrane transport in biology. Vol IVA, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 47–95Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kinne R (1976) Properties of the glucose transport system in the renal brush border membrane. In: Bronner F, Kleinzeller A (eds) Current topics in membranes and transport. Vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 209–267Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohn PG, Smyth DH, Wright EM (1968) Effects of amino acids, dipeptides and disaccharides on the electric potential across rat small intestine. J Physiol 196: 723–746Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kokko JP (1973) Proximal tubule potential difference. Dependence on glucose, HCO3 and amino acids. J Clin Invest 52: 1362–1367Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loeschke K, Baumann K, Renschler R, Ullrich KJ (1969) Differenzierung zwischen aktiver und passiver Komponente desd-Glukosetransports am proximalen Konvolut der Rattenniere. Pflügers Arch 305: 118–138Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maruyama T, Hoshi T (1972) The effect ofd-glucose on the electrical potential profile across the proximal tubule of Newt kidney. Biochim Biophys Acta 282: 214–225Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maunsbach AB (1973) Ultrastructure of the proximal tubule. In: Orloff J, Berliner RW (eds) Handbook of physiology. Vol 8, Renal physiology. American Physiological Society. Washington, pp 31–79Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Okada Y (1979) Solute transport process in intestinal epithelial cells. Membr Biochem 2: 339–365Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reuss L, Finn AL (1975) Electrical properties of the cellular transepithelial pathway in Necturus gallbladder. I. Circuit analysis and steady state effects of mucosal solution ionic substitutions. J Membr Biol 25: 115–139Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rose RC, Schultz SG (1971) Studies on the electrical potential profile across rabbit ileum. Effects of sugars and amino acids on transmural and transmucosal electrical potential differences. J Gen Physiol 57: 639–663Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sacktor B (1977) Transport in membrane vesicles isolated from the mammalian kidney and intestine. In: Sanadi DR (ed) Current topics in bioenergetics. Vol 6. Academic Press, New York San Francisco London, pp 39–81Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Samaržija I, Frömter E (1982) Electrophysiological analysis of rat renal sugar and amino acid transport. III. Neutral amino acids. Pflügers Arch 393: 199–209Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Samaržija I, Frömter E (1982) Electrophysiological analysis of rat renal sugar and amino acid transport. IV. Basic amino aicds. Pflügers Arch (in press)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Samaržija I, Frömter E (1982) Electrophysiological analysis of rat renal sugar and amino acid transport. V. Acidic amino acids. Pflügers Arch (in press)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Samaržija I, Hinton BT, Frömter E (1982) Electrophysiological analysis of rat renal sugar and amino acid transport. II. Dependence on various transport parameters and inhibitors. Pflügers Arch 393: 190–197Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Samaržija I, Molnar E, Frömter E (1982) Mechanism of Na+-coupled anion absorption across the brush border membrane of rat renal proximal tubule. In: Takács L (ed) Advances in physiological sciences. Vol 1, Kidney and body fluids. Pergamon Press and Akadémiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 419–423Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schultz SG, Zalusky R (1964) Ion transport in isolated rabbit ileum. II. The interaction between active sodium and active sugar transport. J Gen Physiol 47: 1043–1059Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thurau K, Dörge A, Mason J, Beck F, Rick R (1979) Intracellular elemental concentrations in renal tubular cells. An electron microprobe analysis. Klin Wochenschr 57: 993–1000Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ullrich KJ (1976) Renal tubular mechanisms of organic solute transport. Kidney Int 9: 134–148Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ullrich KJ, Frömter E, Baumann K (1969) Micropuncture and microanalysis in kidney physiology. In: Passow H, Stämpfli R (eds) Laboratory techniques in membrane biophysics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 106–129Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    White JF, Armstrong WMcD (1971) Effect of transported solutes on membrane potentials in bullfrog small intestine. Am J Physiol 221: 194–201Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Welling LW, Welling DJ (1976) Shape of epithelial cells and intercellular channels in the rabbit proximal nephron. Kidney Int 9: 385–394Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Frömter
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für BiophysikFrankfurt 70Germany

Personalised recommendations