Oecologia

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 151–156 | Cite as

Plant-herbivore interactions

The indigestibility of C4 bundle sheath cells by grasshoppers
  • Hal Caswell
  • Frank C. Reed
Article

Summary

Plants with the C4 dicarboxylic acid pathway of photosynthetic CO2 fixation are generally nutritionally inferior to C3 (Calvin cycle) plants as foodstuff for herbivores. A possible contributing factor to this nutritional inferiority is the concentration, in C4 plants, of large quantities of nutritional material in very tough, thick-walled vascular bundle sheath cells which herbivores may not be able to break down. Experiments with 10 species of grass-hoppers from different areas in the United States revealed large numbers of unbroken bundle sheath cells, contents intact, in fecal pellets produced when the grasshoppers were fed C4 vegetation. We conclude that the material stored in C4 bundle sheath cells is at least partially unavailable to herbivores, and that this may contribute to the observed nutritional inferiority of C4 vegetation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berry, J.A., Downton, W.J.S., Tregunna, E.B.: The photosynthetic carbon metabolism ofZea mays andGomphrena globosa: the location of CO2 fixation and the carboxyl transfer reactions. Canad. J. Bot.48, 777–786 (1970)Google Scholar
  2. Black, C.C.: Ecological implications of dividing plants into groups with distinct photosynthetic production capacities. Adv. Ecol. Res.7, 87–114 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. Black, C.C.: Photosynthetic carbon fixation in relation to net CO2 uptake. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol.24, 253–286 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Black, C.C., Mollenhauer, H.H.: Structure and distribution of chloroplasts and other organelles in leaves with varying rates of photosynthesis. Plant Physiol.47, 15–23 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Caswell, H., Reed, F.C.: Indigestibility of C4 bundle sheath cells by the grasshopperMelanoplus confuses. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer.68, 686–688 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. Caswell, H., Reed, F., Stephenson, S.N., Werner, P.A.: Photosynthetic pathways and selective herbivory: a hypothesis. Amer. Natur.107, 465–480 (1973)Google Scholar
  7. Hatch, M.D., Osmond, C.B., Slatyer, R.O. (eds.): Photosynthesis and photorespiration. New York: Wiley 1971Google Scholar
  8. Kroh, G., Beaver, D.L.: Insect responses to mixture and monoculture patches of C3 and C4 plants. Submitted for publication (1976)Google Scholar
  9. Laetsch, W.M.: Chloroplast structural relationships in leaves of C4 plants. pp. 322–353. In: Photosynthesis and photorespiration (M.D. Hatch, C.B. Osmond, R.O. Slatyer, eds.). New York: Wiley 1971Google Scholar
  10. Lavigne, R.J., Kumar, R., Leetham, J., Keith, V.: Population densities and biomass of aboveground arthropods under various grazing and environmental stress treatments on the Pawnee Site, 1971. Tech. Rep. 204, U.S.I.B.P. Grassland Biome (1972)Google Scholar
  11. Milthorpe, F.L., Moorby, J.: Crop physiology. Cambridge Cambridge Univ. Press 1974Google Scholar
  12. Moss, D.N., Rasmussen, H.P.: Cellular localizatiof CO2 fixation and translocation of metabolites. Plant Physiol.44, 1063–1068 (1969)Google Scholar
  13. Osmond, C.B.: Metabolite transfer in C4 photosynthesis. Austral. J. biol. Sci.24, 159–163 (1971)Google Scholar
  14. Welkie, G.W., Caldwell, M.: Leaf anatomy of species in some dicotyledon families as related to the C3 and C4 pathways of carbon fixation. Canad. J. Bot.48, 2135–2146 (1970)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hal Caswell
    • 1
  • Frank C. Reed
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyMichigan State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of BotanyMichigan State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations