Theoretica chimica acta

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 159–163 | Cite as

A misconception concerning the electronic density distribution of an atom

  • Harel Weinstein
  • Peter Politzer
  • Shalom Srebrenik
Relationes

Abstract

It is shown that the electronic charge density of a ground-state atom decreases monotonically as a function of radial distance from the nucleus, contrary to the widespread belief that the shell structure is reflected by relative maxima in the density. Any proposed relationship between chemical bonding and the maxima in the radial density functions of atoms should therefore be regarded with caution. It is proven that the electrostatic potential of an atom must be monotonically decreasing. The changes in charge distribution upon molecule formation are also discussed.

Key words

Electron density distribution in atoms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eyring,H., Walter,J., Kimball,G.E.: Quantum chemistry, pp. 166–167. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1944; Moeller,T.: Inorganic chemistry, p. 129. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1952; Atkins,P.W.: Molecular quantum mechanics, p. 261. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1970; Levine,I.N.: Quantum chemistry, Vol. I, p. 287. Boston: Allyn and Bacon 1970Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodisman,J.: Theoret. Chim. Acta (Berl.)31, 101 (1973)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dementi,E.: Tables of atomic wave functions. San Jose, Calif.: International Business Machines Corp. 1965Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen,M., Dalgarno,A.: Proc. Phys. Soc.77, 748 (1961); Kern,C.W., Karplus,M.: J. Chem. Phys.40, 1374 (1964)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sperber,G.: Intern. J. Quantum Chem.5, 189 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weeks,J.D., Hazi,A., Rice,S.A.: Advan. Chem. Phys.16, 283 (1969); Simons,G.: J. Chem. Phys.55, 756 (1971)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slater,J.C.: Phys. Rev.36, 57 (1930); Slater,J.C.: J. Chem. Phys.41, 3199 (1964)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clementi,E., Raimondi,D.L., Reinhardt,W.P.: J. Chem. Phys.47, 1300 (1967)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mulliken,R.S.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.72, 4493 (1950)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    See, for example: Bader,R.F.W., Henneker,W.H., Cade,P.E.: J. Chem. Phys.46, 3341 (1967); Ransil,B.J., Sinai,J.J.: J. Chem. Phys.46, 4050 (1967); Hazelrigg,Jr.,M.J., Politzer,P.: J. Phys. Chem.73, 1008 (1969)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Politzer,P.: Theoret. Chim. Acta (Berl.)16, 120 (1970)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See, for instance: Boyd,D.B.: J. Chem. Phys.52, 4846 (1970); Absar, I., Van Wazer, J. R.: J. Chem. Phys.56, 1284 (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harel Weinstein
    • 1
  • Peter Politzer
    • 1
    • 3
  • Shalom Srebrenik
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryTechnion, Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifa
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations