Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 5157–5162 | Cite as

A comparison of mechanical properties of some foams and honeycombs

  • Balakrishna T. Bhat
  • T. G. Wang
Papers

Abstract

The mechanical properties of foams and honeycombs are compared using a normalizing procedure and it is suggested that ideal closed cell foams may be comparable or superior to honeycombs.

Keywords

Polymer Mechanical Property Foam Cell Foam Close Cell Foam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. J. Gibson andM. F. Ashby, “Structure and Properties of Cellular Solids” (Pergamon, Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mechanical Properties of Hexcel Honeycomb Materials TSB 120 (1982) 15.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Good Fellow Metals, Materials for Research and Development, Catalog 8 (1987-88) p. 58.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. H. Thornton andC. L. Magee,Met. Trans. 6A (1955) 1253.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CYRO Industries Data Sheet on Rohacell (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Good Fellow Metals, Materials for Research and Development, Catalog 8 (1987-88) p. 70.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Good Fellow Metals, Materials for Research and Development, Catalog 8 (1987-88) p. 75.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Good Fellow Metals, Materials for Research and Development, Catalog 8 (1987-88) p. 53.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Good Fellow Metals, Materials for Research and Development, Catalog 8 (1987-88) p. 56.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    “Metals Handbook”, Vol. 1, 8th edn (ASM, Ohio, 1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Balakrishna T. Bhat
    • 1
  • T. G. Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations