Earth, Moon, and Planets

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 285–336

Global stratigraphy of Venus: analysis of a random

  • Alexander T. Basilevsky
  • James W. HeadIII
Article

Abstract

The age relations between 36 impact craters with dark paraboloids and other geologic units and structures at these localities have been studied through photogeologic analysis of Magellan SAR images of the surface of Venus. Geologic settings in all 36 sites, about 1000 × 1000 km each, could be characterized using only 10 different terrain units and six types of structures. These units and structures form a major stratigraphic and geologic sequence (from oldest to youngest): 1) tessera terrain; 2) densely fractured terrains associated with coronae and in the form of remnants among plains; 3) fractured and ridged plains and ridge belts; 4) plains with wrinkle ridges; 5) ridges associated with coronae annulae and ridges of arachnoid annulae which are contemporary with wrinkle ridges of the ridged plains; 6) smooth and lobate plains; 7) fractures of coronae annulae, and fractures not related to coronae annulae, which disrupt ridged and smooth plains; 8) rift-associated fractures; 9) craters with associated dark paraboloids, which represent the youngest 10% of the Venus impact crater population (Campbellet al., 1992), and are on top of all volcanic and tectonic units except the youngest episodes of rift-associated fracturing and volcanism; surficial streaks and patches are approximately contemporary with dark-paraboloid craters.

Mapping of such units and structures in 36 randomly distributed large regions (each ∼ 106 km2) shows evidence for a distinctive regional and global stratigraphic and geologic sequence. On the basis of this sequence we have developed a model that illustrates several major themes in the history of Venus. Most of the history of Venus (that of its first 80% or so) is not preserved in the surface geomorphological record. The major deformation associated with tessera formation in the period sometime between 0.5–1.0 b.y. ago (Ivanov and Basilevsky, 1993) is the earliest event detected. In the terminal stages of tessera formation, extensive parallel linear graben swarms representing a change in the style of deformation from shortening to extension were formed on the tessera and on some volcanic plains that were emplaced just after (and perhaps also during the latter stages of the major compressional phase of tessera emplacement. Our stratigraphic analyses suggest that following tessera formation, extensive volcanic flooding resurfaced at least 85% of the planet in the form of the presently-ridged and fractured plains. Several lines of evidence favor a high flux in the post-tessera period but we have no independent evidence for the absolute duration of ridged plains emplacement. During this time, the net state of stress in the lithosphere apparently changed from extensional to compressional, first in the form of extensive ridge belt development, followed by the formation of extensive wrinkle ridges on the flow units. Subsequently, there occurred local emplacement of smooth and lobate plains units which are presently essentially undeformed. The major events in the latest 10% of the presently preserved history of Venus (less than 50 m.y. ago) are continued rifting and some associated volcanism, and the redistribution of eolian material largely derived from impact crater deposits.

Detailed geologic mapping and stratigraphic synthesis are necessary to test this sequence and to address many of the outstanding problems raised by this analysis. For example, we are uncertain whether this stratigraphic sequence corresponds to geologic events which were generally synchronous in all the sites and all around the planet, or whether the sequence is simply a typical sequence of events which occurred in different places at different times. In addition, it is currently unknown whether the present state represents a normal consequence of the general thermal evolution of Venus (and is thus representative of the level of geological activity predicted for the future), or if Venus, has been characterized by a sequence of periodic global changes in the composition and thermal state of its crust and upper mantle (in which case, Venus could in the future return to levels of deformation and resurfacing typical of the period of tessera formation).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACSN, 1961, American Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature,Am. Assn. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 45, 645–660.Google Scholar
  2. Barsukov, V. L.,et al.: 1986, ‘The Geology and Geomorphology of the Venus Surface as Revealed by the Radar Images Obtained by Venera 15 and 16’,J. Geophys. Res. 91, D399–411.Google Scholar
  3. Basilevsky, A. T.: 1993, ‘Age of Rifting and Associated Volcanism in Atla, Regio, Venus’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 883–886.Google Scholar
  4. Basilevsky, A. T. and Head, J. W.: 1994, ‘Characteristics of the Geology of Thirty-Six Sites on Venus’, Brown University Library, Providence RI, 72 p.Google Scholar
  5. Basilevsky, A. T., Pronin, A. A., Ronca, L. B., Kryuchkov, V. P., Sukhanov, A. L., and Markov, M. S.: 1986, ‘Styles of Tectonic Deformations on Venus: Analysis of Venera 15 and 16 Data’,J. Geophys. Res. 91, suppl., D399-D411.Google Scholar
  6. Bilotti, F.: 1992, ‘Global Organization of Tectonic Deformation on Venus’,Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 24, 107–108.Google Scholar
  7. Bindschadler, D. L. and Head, J. W.: 1991, ‘Tessera Terrain, Venus: Characterization and Models for Origin and Evolution’,J. Geophys. Res. 96(B4), 5889–5907.Google Scholar
  8. Bindschadler, D. L., Schubert, G., and Kaula, W. M.: 1992, ‘Coldspots and Hotspots: Global Tectonic and Mantle Dynamics of Venus’,J. Geophys. Res. 97(E8), 13563–13578.Google Scholar
  9. Bullock, M. A., Grinspoon, D. H., and Head, J. W.: 1993, ‘Venus Resurfacing Rates: Constraints Provided by 3-D Monte Carlo Simulations’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2147–2150.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, D. B., Stacy, N. J. S., Newman, W. I., Arvidson, R. E., Jones, E. M., Musser, G. S., Roper, A. Y., and Schaller, C.: 1992, ‘Magellan Observations of Extended Impact Crater Related Features on the Surface of Venus’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 16249–16277.Google Scholar
  11. Crumpler, L. S., Head, J. W., and Aubele, J. C.: 1993, ‘Relation of Major Volcanic Center Concentration on Venus to Global Tectonic Patterns’,Science 261, 591–595.Google Scholar
  12. Diggle, P. J., Fisher, N. L, and Lee, A. J.: 1985, ‘A Comparison of Tests of Uniformity for Spherical Data’,Austral. J. Statistics 27, 53–59.Google Scholar
  13. Greeley, R., Arvidson, R. E., Elachi, C., Geringer, M. A., Plaut, J. J., Saunders, R. S., Schubert, G., Stofan, E. R., Thouvenot, E. J. P., Wall, S. D., and Weitz, C. M.: 1992, ‘Aeolian Features on Venus: Preliminary Magellan Results’,J. Geophys. Res. 97(E8), 13319–13345.Google Scholar
  14. Greeley, R. and Guest, J. E.: 1987,Geological Map of the Eastern Equatorial Region of Mars, U.S. Geological Survey Map I-1802-B.Google Scholar
  15. Head, J. W., Crumpler, L. S., Aubele, J. C., Guest, J. E., and Saunders, R. S.: 1992, ‘Venus Volcanism: Classification of Volcanic Features and Structures, Associations, and Global Distribution from Magellan Data’,J. Geophys. Res. 97(E8), 13153–13197.Google Scholar
  16. Head, J. W., Parmentier, E. M., and Hess, P. C.: 1994, ‘Venus: Vertical Accretion of Crust and Depleted Mantle and Implications for Geological History and Processes’,Planetary and Space Science, in press.Google Scholar
  17. Head, J. W., Pieters, C. M., McCord, T. B., Adams, J. A., and Zisk, S.: 1978, ‘Definition and Detailed Characterization of Lunar Surface Units Using Remote Observations’,Icarus 33, 145–172.Google Scholar
  18. Ivanov, M. A. and Basilevsky, A. T.: 1993, ‘Density and Morphology of Impact Craters on Tessera Terrain, Venus’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2579–2582.Google Scholar
  19. Ivanov, M. A. and Head, J. W.: 1994, ‘Tessera Terrain on Venus: A Survey of the Global Distribution, Characteristics, and Relation to Surrounding Units from Magellan Data’,Earth, Moon and Planets, submitted.Google Scholar
  20. McGill, G. E.: 1993, ‘Wrinkle Ridges, Stress Domains, and Kinematics of Venusian Plains’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2407–2410.Google Scholar
  21. Nikishin, A. M., Pronin, A. A., and Basilevsky, A. T.: 1992, in V. L. Barsukovet al. (eds.),Hot-Spot Structures, in Venus Geology, Geochemistry, and Geophysics, Research Results from the USSR, University of Arizona Press, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar
  22. Parmentier, E. M. and Hess, P. C.: 1992, ‘Chemical Differentiation of a Convecting Planetary Interior: Consequences for a One Plate Planet Such as Venus’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 2015–2018.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, R., Raubertas, R. F., Arvidson, R. E., Sarkar, I. C., Herrick, R. R., Izenberg, N., and Grimm, R. E.: 1992, ‘Impact Craters and Venus Resurfacing History’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 15923–15948.Google Scholar
  24. Plaut, J.J.: 1993, in J. P. Fordet al. (eds.),Stereo Imaging, in Guide to Magellan Image Interpretation, Chapter 4, JPL Pub., 93–24, 33–44.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, K. M., Guest, J. E., Head, J. W., and Lancaster, M. G.: 1992, ‘Mylitta Fluctus, Venus: Rift-Related, Centralized Volcanism and the Emplacement of Large-Volume Flow Units’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 15991–16015.Google Scholar
  26. Schaber, G. G., Strom, R. G., Moore, H. J., Soderblom, L. A., Kirk, R. L., Chadwick, D. J., Dawson, D. D., Gaddis, L. R., Boyce, J. M., and Russell, J.: 1992, ‘Geology and Distribution of Impact Craters on Venus: What are They Telling Us?’,J. Geophys. Res. 97(E8), 13256–13302.Google Scholar
  27. Scott, D. H. and Tanaka, K. L.: 1986, ‘Geological Map of the Western Equatorial Region of Mars’, U.S. Geological Survey Map I-1802-A.Google Scholar
  28. Senske, D. A., Schaber, G. G., and Stofan, E. R.: 1992, ‘Regional Topographic Rises on Venus: Geology of Western Eistla Regio and Comparison to Beta Regio and Atla Regio’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 13395–13420.Google Scholar
  29. Squyres, S. W., Jankowski, D. G., Simons, M., Solomon, S. C., Hager, B. H., and McGill, G. E.: 1992, ‘Plains Tectonism on Venus: The Deformation Belts of Lavinia Planitia’,J. Geophys. Res. 97(E8), 13579–13599.Google Scholar
  30. Solomon, S. C.: 1978, ‘On Volcanism and Thermal Tectonics on One-Plate Planets’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 461–464.Google Scholar
  31. Solomon, S. C.: 1993, ‘A Tectonic Resurfacing Model for Venus’,Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 24, 1331–1332.Google Scholar
  32. Solomon, S. C. and Head, J. W.: 1980, ‘Lunar Mascon Basins: Lava Filling, Tectonics and Evolution of the Lithosphere’,Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 18, 107–141.Google Scholar
  33. Solomon, S. C., Smrekar, S. C., Bindschadler, D. L., Grimm, R. E., Kaula, W. K., McGill, G. E., Phillips, R. J., Saunders, R. S., Schaber, G., Squyres, S. W., and Stofan, E. R.: 1992, ‘Venus Tectonics: An Overview of Magellan Observations’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 13199–13255.Google Scholar
  34. Stofan, E. R., Sharpton, V. L., Schubert, G., Baer, G., Bindschadler, D. L., Janes, D. M., and Squyres, S. W.: 1992, ‘Global Distribution and Characteristics of Coronae and Related Features on Venus: Implications for Origin and Relation to Mantle Processes’,J. Geophys. Res. 97(E8), 13347–13378.Google Scholar
  35. Strom, R. G.: 1993, ‘Parabolic Features and the Erosion Rate on Venus’,Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 24, 1371–1372.Google Scholar
  36. Strom, R. G., Schaber, G. G., and Dawson, D. D.: 1994, ‘The Global Resurfacing of Venus’,J. Geophys. Res. 99, 10899–10926.Google Scholar
  37. Sukhanov, A. L.: 1992, in V. L. Barsukovet al. (eds.),Tesserae, in Venus Geology, Geochemistry, and Geophysics, Research Results from the USSR, University of Arizona Press, pp. 82–95.Google Scholar
  38. Tanaka, K. L., (compiler): 1994,Venus Geologic Mappers' Handbook, Second Edition, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 94-438, 50 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Tanaka, K. L. and Scott, D. H.: 1987,Geological Map of the Polar Regions of Mars, U.S. Geological Survey Map I-1802-C.Google Scholar
  40. Weitz, C. M., Elachi, C., Moore, H. J., Basilevsky, A. T., Ivanov, B. A., and Schaber, G. G.: 1992, ‘Low Emissivity Impact Craters on Venus’,Int. Coll. on Venus, LPI Pub. 789, 129–131.Google Scholar
  41. Wilhelms, D. E.: 1972,Geologic Mapping of the Second Planet, USGS Interagency Report 55, 36 PP.Google Scholar
  42. Wilhelms, D. E.: 1990, in R. Greeley and R. M. Batson (eds.),Geologic Mapping, in Planetary Mapping, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 208–260.Google Scholar
  43. Zuber, M. T. and Parmentier, E. M.: 1990, ‘On the Relationship between Isostatic Elevation and the Wavelengths of Tectonic Surface Features on Venus’,Icarus 85, 290–308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander T. Basilevsky
    • 1
    • 2
  • James W. HeadIII
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesBrown University
  2. 2.Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical ChemistryRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations