Chemistry of Natural Compounds

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 417–421 | Cite as

Structure of a new chalcone ammothamnidin fromAmmothamnus lehmanni

  • A. Sattikulov
  • Sh. V. Abdullaev
  • É. Kh. Batirov
  • Yu. V. Kurbatov
  • V. M. Malikov
  • A. D. Vdovin
  • M. R. Yagudaev
Article
First Online:
Received:

Abstract

A new chalcone ammothamnidin with the composition C25H28O4, mp 112–114°C [α] D 20 + 4.5° (methanol) has been isolated from the epigeal part and roots ofAmmothamnus lehmanni Bge. On the basis of chemical transformations and IR, UV,1H and13C NMR, and mass spectra it has been shown that ammothamnidin has the structure of 2,2′,4′-trihydroxy-3′-(2″-isopropenyl-5″-methylhex-4″-enyl)chalcone.

Keywords

Chalcone Anhydrous Sodium Sulfate Epigeal Part Enyl Quinolizidine 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    The Flora of Uzbekistan [in Russian], Tashkent (1955), p. 402.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Erezhepov, The Flora of Karakalpakia, Its Economic Characterization, Utilization, and Protection [in Russian], Tashkent (1978), p. 18.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Yu. Yunusov, Alkaloids [in Russian], Tashkent (1980), p. 202.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. V. Lazur'evskii and A. S. Sadykov, Zh. Obshch. Khim.,13, Nos. 4–5, 309 (1943).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. K. Klyshev, V. A. Bandyukova, and L. S. Alyukina, Plant Flavonoids [in Russian], Alma-Ata (1978), p. 16.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Jurd, in: The Chemistry of Flavonoid Compounds (ed. T. A. Geissman), Pergamon, Oxford (1962), p. 141.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. J. Mabry, K. R. Markham, and M. B. Thomas, The Systematic Identification of Flavonoids, Springer-Verlag, New York (1970), pp. 227, 267.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Hatayama and M. Komatsu, Chem. Pharm. Bull,,19, 2126 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Kuogoku, K. Hatayama, and M. Komatsu, Chem. Pharm. Bull.,21, 2733 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Cardillo, L. Merlini, and R. Mondelli, Tetrahedron,24, 497 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Kuogoku, K. Hatayama, S. Yokomori, M. Shio, and M. Komatsu, Chem. Pharm. Bull.,21, 1192 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. R. Markham and B. Ternai, Tetrahedron,32, 2607 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Pelter, R. S. Ward, and T. I. Gray, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin. Trans.1, 2475 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Solaniova, S. Toma, and S. Gronowitz, Org. Magn. Reson.,8, 439 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Breitmaier, and W. Voelter,13C NMR Spectroscopy, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim (1978), p. 138.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. W. Wehrli, Z. Switzerland, and T. Nishida, Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturstoffe,36, 1 (1979).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. B. Smith and T. W. Poulx, Org. Magn. Reson.,8, 205 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Itagaki, T. Kurokawa, and S. Sasaki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.,39, 538 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. P. Johnson, A. Pelter, and P. Stainton, J. Chem. Soc., 192 (1966).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. C. Nascimento and W. B. Mors, Phytochemistry,11, 3203 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Sattikulov
  • Sh. V. Abdullaev
  • É. Kh. Batirov
  • Yu. V. Kurbatov
  • V. M. Malikov
  • A. D. Vdovin
  • M. R. Yagudaev

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations