, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 185–191 | Cite as

Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (order testudines)

  • James F. Berry
  • Richard Shine


This paper combines published and original data on sexual size dimorphism, reproductive behavior, and habitat types in turtles. Our major finding is that observed patterns of sexual size dimorphism correlate with habitat type and male mating strategy. (1) In most terrestrial species, males engage in combat with each other. Males typically grow larger than females. (2) In semiaquatic and “bottom-walking” aquatic species, male combat is less common, but males often forcibly inseminate females. As in terrestrial species, males are usually larger than females. (3) In truly aquatic species, male combat and forcible insemination are rare. Instead, males utilize elaborate precoital displays, and female choice is highly important. Males are usually smaller than females.

We interpret these correlations between sexual behavior and size dimorphism in terms of sexual selection theory: males are larger than females when large male size evolves as an adaptation to increase success in male combat, or to enable forcible insemination of females. In contrast, males are usually smaller than females where small size in males evolves to increase mobility (and hence, ability to locate females), or because selection for increased fecundity may result in increased female size. In turtle species with male combat or forcible insemination, the degree of male size superiority increases with mean species body size.


Habitat Type Sexual Selection Aquatic Species Female Choice Sexual Size Dimorphism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, E.R., Neill, W.T.: The alligator snapping turtle,Macrochelys temmincki, in Florida. Spl. Publ. Ross Allen's Rept. Inst.4, 1–15 (1950)Google Scholar
  2. Auffenberg, W.: Notes on the courtship of the land tortoiseGeochelone travancorica (Boulenger). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.61(2), 1–7 (1964)Google Scholar
  3. Auffenberg, W.: Sex and species discrimination in two sympatric South American tortoises. Copeia1965, 335–342 (1965)Google Scholar
  4. Auffenberg, W.: Display behavior in tortoises. Amer. Zool.17, 241–250 (1977)Google Scholar
  5. Auffenberg, W.: Courtship and breeding behavior inGeochelone radiata (Testudines: Testudinidae). J. Herp.34, 277–287 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. Booth, J., Peters, J.A.: Behavioural studies on the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) in the sea. Anim. Behav.20, 808–812 (1972)Google Scholar
  7. Brown, W.S.: Ecology of the aquatic box turtle,Terrapene coahuila (Chelonia, Emydidae) in northern Mexico. Bull. Frorid State Mus., Biol. Sci.19(1), 1–67 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Burbidge, A.A.: The biology of south-western Australian tortoises. Ph. D. sissertation, Univ. Western Australia (1967)Google Scholar
  9. Carpenter, C.C.: Notes on the behavior and ecology of the Galapagos tortoise on Santa Cruz Island. Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci., Biol. Sci.1965, 28–32 (1965)Google Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Harvey, P.H., Rudder, B.: Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature269, 197–200 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. Darwin, C.: The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. 2nd Ed. New York: Hurst 1874Google Scholar
  12. Davis, J.D., Jackson, C.G., Jr.: Notes on the courtship of a captive maleChrysemys scripta taylori. Herpetologica29, 62–64 (1973)Google Scholar
  13. Eglis, A.: Tortoise behavior: A taxonomic adjunct. Herpetologica18, 1–8 (1962)Google Scholar
  14. Ernst, C.H.: Observations on the courtship of maleGraptemys pseudogeographica. J. Herp.8, 377–378 (1974)Google Scholar
  15. Ernst, C.H.: Ecology of the spotted turtle,Clemmys guttata (Reptilia, Testudines, Testudinidae), in southeastern Pennsylvania. J. Herp.10, 25–33 (1976)Google Scholar
  16. Ernst, C.H.: Biological notes on the bog turtle,Clemmys muhlenbergii. Herpetologica33, 241–246 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. Ernst, C.H., Barbour, R.W.: Turtles of the United States. Lexington: Univ. Press of Kentucky 1972Google Scholar
  18. Frazier, J.: Observations on the sea turtles at Aldabra Atoll. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond.260 373–410 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Ghiselin, M.T.: The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. Berkeley: Univ. California Press 1974Google Scholar
  20. Gibbons, J.W.: Ecology and population dynamics of the chicken turtle,Deirochelys reticularia. Copeia1969, 669–676 (1969)Google Scholar
  21. Gibbons, J.W., Coker, J.W.: Ecological and life history aspects of the cooter,Chrysemys floridana (LeConte). Herpetologica33, 29–33 (1977)Google Scholar
  22. Graham, T.E., Doyle, T.S.: Dimorphism, courtship, eggs, and hatchlings of Blanding's turtle,Emydoidea blandingii (Reptilia, Testudines, Emydidae), in Massachusetts. J. Herp.13, 125–127 (1979)Google Scholar
  23. Grubb, P.: The growth, ecology, and population structure of giant tortoises on Aldabra. Trans. Roy. Soc. London260, 327–372 (1971a)Google Scholar
  24. Grubb, P.: Comparative notes on the behavior ofGeochelone sulcata. Herpetologica27, 328–333 (1971b)Google Scholar
  25. Hirth, H., Carr, A.: The green turtle in the Gulf of Aden and the Seychelles Islands. Verh. Kon. Nederl Ak. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurkunde58(5), 1–44 (1970)Google Scholar
  26. Howard, R.D.: The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs,Rana catesbeiana. Evolution32, 850–871 (1978)Google Scholar
  27. Hulse, A.C.: An autecological study ofKinosternon sonoriense LeConte (Chelonia: Kinosternidae). Ph. D. dissertation, Arizona State Univ. (1974)Google Scholar
  28. Hulse, A.C.: Growth and morphometrics ofKinosternon sonoriense (Reptilia, Testudines, Kinosternidae). J. Herp.10, 341–348 (1976)Google Scholar
  29. Iverson, J.B.: Notes on courtship inRhinoclemys funerea. J. Herp.9, 249–250 (1975)Google Scholar
  30. Jackson, C.G., Jr.: A biometrical study of growth inPseudemys concinna suwanniensis. I. Copeia1970, 528–534 (1970)Google Scholar
  31. Jackson, C.G., Jr.: Courtship observations onChrysemys nelsoni (Reptilia, Testudines, Testudinidae). J. Herp.11, 221–222 (1977)Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, C.G., Jr., Davis, J.D.: A quantitative study of the courtship display of the red-eared turtle,Chrysemys scripta elegans (Wied.). Herpetologica28, 58–64 (1972a)Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, C.G., Jr., Davis, J.D.: Courtship display behavior ofChrysemys concinna suwanniensis. Copeia1972, 385–387 (1972b)Google Scholar
  34. Jenkins, J.D.: Notes on the courtship of the map turtleGraptemys pseudogeographica (Gray) (Reptilia, Testudines, Emydidae). J. Herp.13, 129–131 (1979)Google Scholar
  35. Kolata, G.B.: Sexual dimorphism and mating systems: How did they evolve? Science125, 382–383 (1977)Google Scholar
  36. Lardie, R.L.: Courtship and mating behavior in the yellow mud turtle,Kinosternon flavescens flavescens. J. Herp.9, 223–227 (1975)Google Scholar
  37. Legler, J.M.: Observations on the sexual behavior of captive turtles. Lloydia18, 95–99 (1955)Google Scholar
  38. Legler, J.M.: Natural history of the ornate box turtle,Terrapene Ornata ornarta Agassiz. Univ. Kansas Publ., Mus. Nat. Hist.11, 527–669 (1960)Google Scholar
  39. Legler, J.M., Webb, R.G.: Remarks on a collection of bolson tortoises,Gopherus flavomarginatus. Herpetologica17, 26–37 (1961)Google Scholar
  40. Loveridge, A., Williams, E.E.: Revision of the African tortoises and turtles of the suborder Cryptodira. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.115, 163–557 (1957)Google Scholar
  41. Mahmound, I.Y.: Courtship behavior and sexual maturity in four species of kinosternid turtles. Copeia1967, 314–319 (1967)Google Scholar
  42. Moll, E.O.: Latitudinal and intersubspecific variation in reproduction of the painted turtle,Chrysemys picta. Herpetologica29, 307–318 (1973)Google Scholar
  43. Moll, E.O.: Natural history of the river terrapin,Batagur baska (Gray) in Malaysia (Testudines: Emydidae). MSaGoogle Scholar
  44. Moll, E.O.: Ecology and reproduction of the painted batagur,Callagur borneoensis, including comparisons withBatagur baska. MSbGoogle Scholar
  45. Moll, E.O., Legler, J.M.: The life history of a neotropical slider turtle,Pseudemys scripta (Schoepff), in Panama. Bull. Los Angeles Co. Mus. Nat. Hist., Science11, 1–102 (1971)Google Scholar
  46. Murphy, J.B., Lamoreaux, W.E.: Mating behavior in three Australian chelid turtles (Testudines: Pleurodira: Chelidae). Herpetologica34, 398–405 (1978)Google Scholar
  47. Myers, D.: Sexual dimorphism in size in vespertilionid bats. Am. Nat.112, 701–711 (1978)Google Scholar
  48. Parmenter, C.J.: The natural history of the Australian freshwater turtleChelodina longicollis Shaw (Testudinata, Chelidae). Ph. D. dissertation, Univ. of New England (1976)Google Scholar
  49. Plummer, M.V.: Notes on the courtship and mating behavior of the softshell turtle,Trionys muticus (Reptilia, Testudines, Trionychidae). J. Herp.11, 90–92 (1977a)Google Scholar
  50. Plummer, M.V.: Reproduction and growth in the turtleTrionyx muticus. Copeia1977, 440–447 (1977b)Google Scholar
  51. Ralls, K.: Mammals in which females are larger than males. Quart. Rev. Biol.51, 245–276 (1976)Google Scholar
  52. Ralls, K.: Sexual dimorphism in mammals: avian models and unanswered questions. Am. Nat.111, 917–938 (1977)Google Scholar
  53. Rose, W.: The reptiles and amphibians of southern Africa. Capetown: Standard Press Ltd. 1962Google Scholar
  54. Sachsse, W., Schmidt, A.A.: Nachzucht in der zweiten Generation vonStaurotypus salvinii mit weiteren Beobachtungen zum Fortpflanzungsverhalten. Salamandra12, 5–16 (1976)Google Scholar
  55. Sanderson, R.A.: Sexual dimorphism in the Barbour's map turtle,Malaclemys barbouri (Carr and Marchand). M.A. thesis, Univ. of South Florida (1974)Google Scholar
  56. Selander, R.K.: Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds.In: Sexual selection and the descent of man. (Campbell, B. ed.), pp. 180–230. Chicago: Aldine 1972Google Scholar
  57. Sexton, O.J.: Notas sobre la reproducción de una tortuga venezolana, laKinosternon scorpioides. Memoria de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle20(57), 189–197 (1960)Google Scholar
  58. Shealy, R.M.: The natural history of the Alabama map turtle,Graptemys pulchra Baur, in Alabama. Bull. Florida State Mus., Biol. Sci.21, 47–111 (1976)Google Scholar
  59. Shine, R.: Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia (Berl.)33, 261–268 (1978)Google Scholar
  60. Shine, R.: Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the amphibia. Copeia1979, 297–306 (1979)Google Scholar
  61. Tinkle, D.W.: The systematics and ecology of theSternothaerus carinatus complex (Testudinata, Chelydridae). Tulane Stud. Zool.6, 3–56 (1958)Google Scholar
  62. Tinkle, D.W.: Geographic variation in reproduction, size sex ratio and maturity ofSternothaerus odoratus (Testudinata: Chelydridae). Ecology42, 68–76 (1961)Google Scholar
  63. Trivers, R.L.: Parental investment and sexual selection.In: Sexual selection and the descent of man. Campbell, B. (ed.), pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine 1972Google Scholar
  64. Trivers, R.L.: Sexual selection and resource-accruing ability inAnolis garmani. Evolution30, 253–269 (1976)Google Scholar
  65. Watson, G.E.: Notes on copulation and distribution of Aegean land tortoises. Copeia1962, 317–321 (1962)Google Scholar
  66. Weaver, W.G., Jr.: Courtship and combat behavior inGopherus berlandieri. Bull. Florida State Mus., Biol. Sci.15, 1–43 (1970)Google Scholar
  67. Wilbur, H.M.: A growth model for the turtleChrysemys picta. Copeia1975, 337–343 (1975)Google Scholar
  68. Wiley, R.H.: Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse. Quart. Rev. Biol.49, 201–227 (1974)Google Scholar
  69. Zovickian, W.H.: Captive reproduction of the radiated tortoise. HISS New-J.1, 115–118 (1973)Google Scholar
  70. Zug, G.R.: Buoyancy, locomotion, morphology of the pelvic girdle and hindlimb, and systemtics of cryptodiran turtles. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan no.142, 1–98 (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Berry
    • 1
  • Richard Shine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations