Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 111, Issue 4, pp 224–227 | Cite as

Non-invasive treatment of long-bone pseudarthrosis by shock waves (ESWLR)

  • R. Schleberger
  • T. Seng
Original Articles

Summary

Non-invasive treatment of non-union of diaphyses by application of the shock waves known from lithotripsy has proved successful in three out of four cases. Two thousand shock waves with a single-wave energy of 18 kV were applied by the MFL 5000 and HM3 Lithotripters of the Dornier Medizintechnik Company with manual detection of the lesion. The shock waves induced a kind of callus formation in the non-union soft tissue within about 6 weeks, which was succesfully maintained and transformed into bony union in all cases but one by dynamic fixation less rigid than a plaster cast. Four cases are documented and the effects of the shock waves and principles of bony union discussed.

Keywords

Public Health Soft Tissue Shock Wave Callus Formation Plaster Cast 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackart KSJW, Schröder FH (1989) Effects of extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on renal tissue. Urol Res 17:3Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blauth W, Falliner A (1989) Probleme der Behandlung angeborener Unterschenkelpseudarthrosen. Z Orthop 127:3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brendel W, Chaussy CH, Forssmann B, Schmiedt E (1979) A new method of non-invasive destruction of renal calculi by shock waves. Br J Surg 66:213Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brendel W, Enders G (1983) Shock waves for gallstones: animal studies. Lancet I:1054Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaussy W, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Schüller J, Brandl H, Liedl D (1984) Extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of urolithiasis. Urology [Suppl 5] 23:59Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delius M, Enders G, Heine G, Stark J, Remberger K, Brendel W (1987) Biological effects of shock waves: lung hemorrhage by shock waves in dogs — pressure dependence. Ultrasound Med Biol 13:61–67Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forssman B, Hepp W, Chaussy Ch, Eisenberger F, Wanner K (1977) Eine Methode zur berührungsfreien Zertrümmerung von Nierensteinen durch Stosswellen. Biomed Tech 22:164Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graff J (1989) Die Wirkung hochenergetischer Stosswellen auf Knochen und Weichteilgewebe. Thesis, Ruhr University BochumGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Kempson FA, Evon AP (1989) Bioeffects of extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy. Endurology 1:89Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mast JW, Spiegel PG, Harvey JP, Harrison C (1975) Fractures of the humeral shaft. Clin Orthop 112:254Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stewart MJ, Hundley JM (1955) Fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 37:681Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Schleberger
    • 1
  • T. Seng
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of the Ruhr University BochumSt. Josef-HospitalBochumGermany
  2. 2.Department of UrologyRuhr UniversityBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations