Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 429–456 | Cite as

Particulate dispersion into and within a forest

  • Gilbert S. Raynor
  • Janet V. Hayes
  • Eugene C. Ogden
Article

Abstract

Particulate dispersion into and within a 10- to 13-m tall pine forest was studied experimentally at Brookhaven National Laboratory using stained ragweed pollen and other tracers ranging from 14 to 54 Μm in diam. Seventy-two continuous point source releases lasting 20 to 40 min were made at various distances from within the forest edge to 60 m upwind and at heights of 1.75 to 14.0 m. In most experiments, differently colored ragweed pollen was released simultaneously from three locations. Thirty-six longer tests were made using pollen from area sources of ragweed and three with pollen from distant sources. All tests were made during the day with steady winds and unstable lapse rates outside the forest. The sampling network consisted of 119 rotoslide samplers mounted at heights from 0.5 to 21.0 m at 57 positions extending 100 m into the forest. Deposition was sampled by greased microscope slides at each sampling position. Meteorological measurements were taken in and near the forest.

Data were classified by particle characteristics; by source type, distance and height; and by meteorological parameters. Isopleths were drawn on scale diagrams of the sampling grid to illustrate concentration patterns. Changes in centerline concentration, crosswind integrated concentration, mass flux, plume width, plume height, deposition, and deposition velocity were related to distance within the forest and other variables. Results were compared to those of similar releases over open terrain and those of previous forest dispersion studies elsewhere.

The plume approaching the forest is broadened both vertically and horizontally by increased turbulence at the forest edge and flows mainly into the trunk space and above the forest. Lateral spread is slow within the forest, but vertical spreading beyond the entrance region is greater than in the open. Particles become mixed uniformly below the canopy while appreciable interchange takes place through this layer. Concentration within the forest decreases at a faster rate than in the open, but change in total mass flux within and above the forest is not significantly different. Loss of material takes place by impaction near the forest edge and in the tree tops and by deposition within the forest. Most loss takes place to the foliage rather than the ground, and larger particles are lost faster than smaller ones.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batchelor, G. K.: 1949, ‘Diffusion in a Field of Homogeneous Turbulence. I. Eulerian analysis’Australian J. Sci. Res. 2, 437–450.Google Scholar
  2. Batchelor, G. K.: 1952, ‘Diffusion in a Field of Homogeneous Turbulence. II. The Relative Motion of Particles’Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 48, 345–362.Google Scholar
  3. Bowne, N. E., Entrekin, H. D., Smith, K. W., and Hilst, G. R.: 1969, ‘Aerosol Diffusion over Woodlot Complexes’, Vol. 1, Summary and Results, Report TRC 343, Travelers Research Corp., Hartford, Conn. 295 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Burnett, G. F. and Thompson, B. W.: 1956, ‘An Investigation of the Behaviour of Coarse Aerosol Clouds in Woodland,Bull. Ent. Res. 47, 495–524.Google Scholar
  5. Calder, K. L.: 1961, A Simple Mathematical Model for the Penetration of Forest Canopy by Aerosols, BL Tech. Study 37, U.S. Army Chem. Corps, Fort Detrick, Md. AD262228, Armed Services Tech. Inf. Agency, Arlington, Va. 30 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Clayton, W. H., Sanford, T. E., and Ackerman, B.: 1970, Evaluation of Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion, Third Semiannual Report. Res. and Dev. Tech. Rept. ECOM-0381-3, U.S. Army Electronics Command, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 68 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Ford, E. F. and Lomen, D. O.: 1969, ‘Diffusion Under a Jungle Canopy’, Final Report, Volume III - Mathematical Model. Melpar, Inc., Falls Church, Va. 124 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Fritschen, L. J., Driver, C. H., Avery, C., Buffo, J., Edmonds, R., Kinerson, R., and Schiess, P.: 1970, Dispersion of Air Tracers into and Within a Forested Area: 3, Res. and Devel. Tech. Rept. ECOM-68-G8-3, U.S. Army Electronics Command, Fort Huachuca, Ariz. 53 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton, H. L., Jr.: 1963, ‘Jungle Canopy Penetration’, Final Report. Volume 1, Diffusion Measurements. Report BSC 36174, The Bendix Corp., Bendix Systems Division. 125 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Melpar, Inc.: 1968, ‘Diffusion Under a Jungle Canopy’, Vol. 1, Main report. Melpar, Inc., Falls Church, Va. 176 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Meroney, R. N.: 1968, ‘‘Characteristics of Wind and Turbulence in and Above Model Forests’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 7, 780–788.Google Scholar
  12. Meroney, R. N. and Yang, B. T.: 1969, Wind Tunnel Studies of the Air Flow and Gaseous Plume Diffusion in the Leading Edge and Downstream Regions of a Model Forest, Tech. Rept. ECOM C-0423-6, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, Colo. 63 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Neuberger, H., Hosler, C. L., and Kocmond, W. C.: 1967, ‘Vegetation as Aerosol Filter’Biometeorol. 2, 693–702.Google Scholar
  14. Ogden, E. C. and Raynor, G. S.: 1967, ‘A New Sampler for Air-Borne Pollen: The Rotoslide’J. Allergy 40, 1–11.Google Scholar
  15. Raynor, G. S.: 1967, Effects of a Forest on Particulate Dispersion, In Proc. USAEC Meteorol. Information, Chalk River, Ontario, Sept. 1967. Report AECL-2787, C. A. Mawson (ed.), Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River, Ontario, p. 581–588.Google Scholar
  16. Raynor, G. S.: 1971, ‘Wind and Temperature Structure in a Coniferous Forest and a Contiguous Field’Forest Sci. 17, 351–363.Google Scholar
  17. Raynor, G. S. and Smith, M. E.: 1964, A Diffusion-Deposition Tracer System, Report BNL 859 (T-343), Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y. 17 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Raynor, G. S., Cohen, L. A., Hayes, J. V., and Ogden, E. C.: 1966, ‘Dyed Pollen Grains and Spores as Tracers in Dispersion and Deposition Studies’J. Appl. Meteorol. 5, 728–729.Google Scholar
  19. Raynor, G. S., Hayes, J. V., and Ogden, E. C.: 1972a, Experimental Data on Particulate Dispersion into and Within a Forest. Part I. Dispersion from Upwind Point Sources, Informal report BNL 17750, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y., 95 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Raynor, G. S., Ogden, E. C., and Hayes, J. V.: 1972b, ‘Dispersion and Deposition of Timothy Pollen from Experimental Sources’Agric. Meteorol. 9, 347–366.Google Scholar
  21. Raynor, G. S., Hayes, J. V., and Ogden, E. C.: 1973, Experimental Data on Particulate Dispersion into and Within a Forest. Part II. Dispersion from Upwind Area Sources, Informal report BNL 18064, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y. 39 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Raynor, G. S., Ogden, E. C., and Hayes, J. V.: 1970, ‘Dispersion and Deposition of Ragweed Pollen from Experimental Sources’J. Appl. Meteorol. 6, 885–895.Google Scholar
  23. Singer, I. A. and Smith, M. E.: 1953, ‘Relation of Gustiness to Other Meteorological Parameters’J. Meteorol. 10, 121–126.Google Scholar
  24. Tauber, H.: 1967, ‘Investigations of the Mode of Pollen Transfer in Forested Areas’Rev. Palaeobotan. Palynol. 3, 277–286.Google Scholar
  25. Tourin, M. H. and Shen, W. C.: 1969, Deciduous Forest Diffusion Study. Final Report, Volume 1, Diffusion Studies in a Deciduous Forest, Report No. 3004, Litton Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn. 325 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert S. Raynor
    • 1
  • Janet V. Hayes
    • 2
  • Eugene C. Ogden
    • 2
  1. 1.Brookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA
  2. 2.New York State Museum and Science ServiceAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations