The moon

, Volume 9, Issue 1–2, pp 167–182 | Cite as

The internal evolution of planetary-sized objects

  • D. C. Tozer


The importance of ‘creep’ in controlling the internal thermal state of large objects with physical properties corresponding to a roughly homogeneous meteoritic composition is reviewed. Some results of this study are used to justify a picture of evolution as a quasistatic process. An attempt is made to show that the viscous dissipation of the motions that occur in the lifetime of such bodies formed about 4.5 × 109 yr ago gives them an innate capacity to chemically differentiate if their external radius exceeds a few hundred kilometres. The capacity to differentiate increases rapidly with external radius and for objects of lunar size and greater, the process is not yet complete. During the ‘active’ stage of evolution the convective cores of these objects tend to grow smaller and hotter with time, giving a secular change in the composition of the differentiating phases. It is suggested that by a curious coincidence of dehydration curves and the horizontally averaged temperature distribution, water of dehydration can still be present at depth in the planets and is the cause of the observed seismic attenuation at the Moon's centre and in the Earth's upper mantle. It is also noted that if water is present at tenths of a percent level the temperature within objects with radii < 3000 km is kept below the Curie point of pure iron for long periods - a situation that could have significant bearing on the present magnetisation of the planetary objects in this size range.


Dehydration Thermal State Internal Evolution Percent Level Viscous Dissipation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Elsasser, W. M.: 1963, in J. Geiss and E. D. Goldberg (eds.),Earth Science and Meteoritics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. Gast, P. W.: 1972,The Moon 5, 121–148.Google Scholar
  3. Green, D. H.: 1972,Tectonophys. 13, 47–71.Google Scholar
  4. MacDonald, G. J. F.: 1959,J. Geophys. Res. 64, No. 11, 1967–2000.Google Scholar
  5. Pandit, B. I., Tozer, D. C.: 1970,Nature 226, 335.Google Scholar
  6. Tozer, D. C.: 1967, in T. Gaskell (ed.),The Earth's Mantle, Academic Press, p. 350.Google Scholar
  7. Tozer, D. C.: 1972a,The Moon 5, 90–105.Google Scholar
  8. Tozer, D. C.: 1972b,Phys. Earth Planetary Int. 6, 182–197.Google Scholar
  9. Wyllie, P.: 1971,The Dynamic Earth, Wiley, p. 211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. C. Tozer
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle upon TyneEngland

Personalised recommendations