Abstract
Long, reverberating trains of seismic waves produced by impacts and moonquakes may be interpreted in terms of scattering in a surface layer overlying a non-scattering elastic medium. Model seismic experiments are used to qualitatively demonstrate the correctness of the interpretation. Three types of seismograms are found, near impact, far impact and moonquake. Only near impact and moonquake seismograms contain independent information. Details are given in the paper of the modelling of the scattering processes by the theory of diffusion.
Interpretation of moonquake and artificial impact seismograms in two frequency bands from the Apollo 12 site indicates that the scattering layer is 25 km thick, with a Q of 5000. The mean distance between scatterers is approximately 5 km at 25 km depth and approximately 2 km at 14 km depth; the density of scatterers appears to be high near the surface, decreasing with depth. This may indicate that the scatterers are associated with cratering, or are cracks that anneal with depth. Most of the scattered energy is in the form of scattered surface waves.
Keywords
Surface Layer Frequency Band Surface Wave Seismic Wave Elastic MediumPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A.: 1965,Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Aki, K.: 1969,J. Geophys. Res. 74, 615–631.Google Scholar
- Berckhemer, H.: 1970,Z. Geophys. 36, 523–529.Google Scholar
- Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C.: 1959,Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chernov, L. A.: 1960,Wave Propagation in a Random Medium, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Costes, N. C., Cohron, G. T., and Moss, D. C.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 1973–1987.Google Scholar
- Gold, T. and Soter, S.: 1970,Science 169, 1071–1075.Google Scholar
- Grant, F. S. and West, G. F.: 1965,Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kanamori, H., Mizutani, H., and Hamano, Y.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2323–2326.Google Scholar
- Kovach, R. L. and Watkins, J. S.: 1972,Rev. Abs. 3rd Lunar Sci. Conf., 461-462.Google Scholar
- Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksöz, N., Wiggins, R., Derr, J., and Duennebier, F.: 1970a,Science 167, 455–457.Google Scholar
- Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksőz, N., Wiggins, R., Derr, J., and Duennebier, F.: 1970b,Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2309–2320.Google Scholar
- Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksőz, N., Wiggins, R., and Kovach, R.: 1970c,Apollo 12 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP-235, 39–53.Google Scholar
- Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Press, F., Toksőz, N., Sutton, G., Meissner, R., Duennebier, F., Nakamura, Y., Kovach, R., and Yates, M.: 1970d,Science 170, 620–626.Google Scholar
- Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksöz, N., Duennebier, F., and Lammlein, D.: 1971a,Apollo 14 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP-272, 133–161.Google Scholar
- Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Press, F., Toksöz, N., Sutton, G., Duennebier, F., and Nakamura, Y.: 1971b,Science 174, 687–692.Google Scholar
- Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksőz, N., Lammlein, D., and Duennebier, F.: 1971c,Apollo 15 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP-289, 8-1-8-25.Google Scholar
- Latham, G., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksöz, N., Lammlein, D., and Duennebier, F.: 1973,Apollo 16 Preliminary Science Report, NASA Special Publication, in press.Google Scholar
- Morse, P. M. and Feshbach, H.: 1953,Methods of Theoretical Physics, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Nakamura, Y., Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., and Dorman, J.: 1970,EOS 51, 776 (Abs.).Google Scholar
- Nakamura, Y., Lammlein, D., Latham, G., Ewing, M., and Dorman, J.: 1973,The Moon, this issue.Google Scholar
- Sommerfeld, A.: 1964,Partial Differential Equations in Physics, Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Steg, R. G. and Klemens, P. G.: 1970,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 381–383.Google Scholar
- Strobach, K.: 1970,Z. Geophys. 36, 643–645.Google Scholar
- Toksöz, M. N., Press, F., Anderson, K., Dainty, A., Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Nakamura, Y., Sutton, G., and Duennebier, F.: 1972a,The Moon 4, 490–504.Google Scholar
- Toksöz, M. N., Press, F., Anderson, K., Dainty, A., Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Sutton, G., Duennebier, F., and Nakamura, Y.: 1972b,Science 176, 1012–1016.Google Scholar
- Toksöz, M. N., Press, F., Dainty, A., Anderson, K., Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Sutton, G., and Duennebier, F.: 1972c,Proc. 3rd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2527–2544.Google Scholar
- Wang, H., Todd, T., Weidner, D., and Simmons, G.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2327–2336.Google Scholar
- Warren, N.: 1972,The Moon 4, 430–441.Google Scholar
- Warren, N., Schreiber, E., Scholz, C., Morrison, J. A., Norton, P. R., Kumazawa, M., and Anderson, O. L.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2345–2360.Google Scholar
- Wesley, J. P.: 1965,J. Geophys. Res. 70, 5099–5106.Google Scholar