The moon

, Volume 9, Issue 1–2, pp 11–29 | Cite as

Seismic scattering and shallow structure of the moon in oceanus procellarum

  • Anton M. Dainty
  • M. Nafi Toksöz
  • Kenneth R. Anderson
  • P. Jacques Pines
  • Y. Nakamura
  • G. Latham
Article

Abstract

Long, reverberating trains of seismic waves produced by impacts and moonquakes may be interpreted in terms of scattering in a surface layer overlying a non-scattering elastic medium. Model seismic experiments are used to qualitatively demonstrate the correctness of the interpretation. Three types of seismograms are found, near impact, far impact and moonquake. Only near impact and moonquake seismograms contain independent information. Details are given in the paper of the modelling of the scattering processes by the theory of diffusion.

Interpretation of moonquake and artificial impact seismograms in two frequency bands from the Apollo 12 site indicates that the scattering layer is 25 km thick, with a Q of 5000. The mean distance between scatterers is approximately 5 km at 25 km depth and approximately 2 km at 14 km depth; the density of scatterers appears to be high near the surface, decreasing with depth. This may indicate that the scatterers are associated with cratering, or are cracks that anneal with depth. Most of the scattered energy is in the form of scattered surface waves.

Keywords

Surface Layer Frequency Band Surface Wave Seismic Wave Elastic Medium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A.: 1965,Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Aki, K.: 1969,J. Geophys. Res. 74, 615–631.Google Scholar
  3. Berckhemer, H.: 1970,Z. Geophys. 36, 523–529.Google Scholar
  4. Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C.: 1959,Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chernov, L. A.: 1960,Wave Propagation in a Random Medium, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Costes, N. C., Cohron, G. T., and Moss, D. C.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 1973–1987.Google Scholar
  7. Gold, T. and Soter, S.: 1970,Science 169, 1071–1075.Google Scholar
  8. Grant, F. S. and West, G. F.: 1965,Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Kanamori, H., Mizutani, H., and Hamano, Y.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2323–2326.Google Scholar
  10. Kovach, R. L. and Watkins, J. S.: 1972,Rev. Abs. 3rd Lunar Sci. Conf., 461-462.Google Scholar
  11. Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksöz, N., Wiggins, R., Derr, J., and Duennebier, F.: 1970a,Science 167, 455–457.Google Scholar
  12. Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksőz, N., Wiggins, R., Derr, J., and Duennebier, F.: 1970b,Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2309–2320.Google Scholar
  13. Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksőz, N., Wiggins, R., and Kovach, R.: 1970c,Apollo 12 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP-235, 39–53.Google Scholar
  14. Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Press, F., Toksőz, N., Sutton, G., Meissner, R., Duennebier, F., Nakamura, Y., Kovach, R., and Yates, M.: 1970d,Science 170, 620–626.Google Scholar
  15. Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksöz, N., Duennebier, F., and Lammlein, D.: 1971a,Apollo 14 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP-272, 133–161.Google Scholar
  16. Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Press, F., Toksöz, N., Sutton, G., Duennebier, F., and Nakamura, Y.: 1971b,Science 174, 687–692.Google Scholar
  17. Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksőz, N., Lammlein, D., and Duennebier, F.: 1971c,Apollo 15 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP-289, 8-1-8-25.Google Scholar
  18. Latham, G., Ewing, M., Press, F., Sutton, G., Dorman, J., Nakamura, Y., Toksöz, N., Lammlein, D., and Duennebier, F.: 1973,Apollo 16 Preliminary Science Report, NASA Special Publication, in press.Google Scholar
  19. Morse, P. M. and Feshbach, H.: 1953,Methods of Theoretical Physics, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Nakamura, Y., Latham, G. V., Ewing, M., and Dorman, J.: 1970,EOS 51, 776 (Abs.).Google Scholar
  21. Nakamura, Y., Lammlein, D., Latham, G., Ewing, M., and Dorman, J.: 1973,The Moon, this issue.Google Scholar
  22. Sommerfeld, A.: 1964,Partial Differential Equations in Physics, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Steg, R. G. and Klemens, P. G.: 1970,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 381–383.Google Scholar
  24. Strobach, K.: 1970,Z. Geophys. 36, 643–645.Google Scholar
  25. Toksöz, M. N., Press, F., Anderson, K., Dainty, A., Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Nakamura, Y., Sutton, G., and Duennebier, F.: 1972a,The Moon 4, 490–504.Google Scholar
  26. Toksöz, M. N., Press, F., Anderson, K., Dainty, A., Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Sutton, G., Duennebier, F., and Nakamura, Y.: 1972b,Science 176, 1012–1016.Google Scholar
  27. Toksöz, M. N., Press, F., Dainty, A., Anderson, K., Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Sutton, G., and Duennebier, F.: 1972c,Proc. 3rd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2527–2544.Google Scholar
  28. Wang, H., Todd, T., Weidner, D., and Simmons, G.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2327–2336.Google Scholar
  29. Warren, N.: 1972,The Moon 4, 430–441.Google Scholar
  30. Warren, N., Schreiber, E., Scholz, C., Morrison, J. A., Norton, P. R., Kumazawa, M., and Anderson, O. L.: 1971,Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2345–2360.Google Scholar
  31. Wesley, J. P.: 1965,J. Geophys. Res. 70, 5099–5106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton M. Dainty
    • 1
  • M. Nafi Toksöz
    • 1
  • Kenneth R. Anderson
    • 1
  • P. Jacques Pines
    • 1
  • Y. Nakamura
    • 2
  • G. Latham
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Earth and Planetary SciencesMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Marine Biomedical InstituteUniversity of Texas at GalvestonGalvestonUSA

Personalised recommendations