Stress corrosion cracking of Al-Zn-Mg alloy AA-7039 by slow strain-rate method
- 107 Downloads
- 12 Citations
Abstract
The stress corrosion behaviour of Al-Zn-Mg alloy AA-7039 in an aqueous 3.5 wt % Nad solution (pH=1) was studied with the specimens under constant strain rate as function of ageing state and cold working. The tests were carried out at temperatures of 30 and 45°C and strain rates between 7.6×10−7 and 7.6×10−6 sec−1 and the apparent activation energy for mechanical deformation in oil and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) process in NaCl solution were determined. The fracture energy in NaCl solution under constant strain rate, as compared with experiments in oil, was lowered in the overaged specimens and markedly lowered in sequence of the peak-aged and the underaged specimens. The values of fracture energy for peak-aged and overaged specimens were nearly similar to those in oil at the higher strain rate of 7.6×10−6 sec−1. The relative fracture energy was comparatively lowered in the fine-grained specimens, as compared to coarsegrained specimens. The apparent activation energy for mechanical processes in oil was found to be 103 kJ mol−1 in the peak-aged and 96.5 kJ mol−1 in the overaged specimens. Those for SCC processes in NaCl solution were 47.5 kJ mol−1 in the peak-aged and 51.5 kJ mol−1 in the overaged specimens. The results suggest that stress corrosion (SC) cracks are initiated by electrochemical dissolution of grain boundaries (gbs) and propagated by mechanical processes such as creep.
Keywords
Cold Working Fracture Energy High Strain Rate Apparent Activation Energy Corrosion BehaviourPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.K. G. Kent,J. Inst. Met. 97 (1969) 127.Google Scholar
- 2.Idem, J. Aust. Inst. Met. 15 (1970) 171.Google Scholar
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.Idem, Corrosion-NACE 31 (1975) 347.Google Scholar
- 8.
- 9.W. Gruhl, B. Grzemba andL. Ratke, 7th International Leichtmetall-Tagung (Montanuniversität, Leoben, 1981) p. 124.Google Scholar
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.Idem, ibid. 62 (1969) 815.Google Scholar
- 13.
- 14.W. Gruhl,Aluminium 38 (1962) 775.Google Scholar
- 15.
- 16.Idem, Aluminium 44 (1968) 403.Google Scholar
- 17.W. Gruhl andF. Ostermann, Berichte zum Symposium der Deutsche Gesellschaft Metallkunde, “Festigkeit metallischer Werkstoffe” (DGM, Bad Nauheim, 1974) pp. 387–410.Google Scholar
- 18.H. A. Holl,Corrosion-NACE 23 (1967) 173.Google Scholar
- 19.M. O. Speidel,Phys. Status Solidus 22 (1967) K71.Google Scholar
- 20.Idem, Proceedings of the Conference on Fundamental Aspects of SCC, The Ohio State University, September 1967 (NACE, Houston, Texas, 1969) pp. 561–79.Google Scholar
- 21.
- 22.W. Gruhl,Z. Metallkde. 53 (1962) 670.Google Scholar
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.R. N. Parkins, F. Mazza, J. J. Royuela andJ. Scully,Werkst. Korros. 23 (1972) 1020; 1124 [Br. Corros. J. 7 (1972) 154].Google Scholar
- 26.M. Takano,Corrosion-NACE 30 (1974) 441.Google Scholar
- 27.H. Buhl,ASTMSTP 665 (1979) 333.Google Scholar
- 28.S. I. Pyun,Metall. 38(3) (1984) in press.Google Scholar
- 29.
- 30.H. Conrad,J. Iron Steel Inst. 198 (1961) 364.Google Scholar
- 31.